UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTIONProxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) OF THE SECURITIESof the Securities

EXCHANGE ACT OFExchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.             )

Filed by the Registrantþ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þDefinitive Proxy Statement
¨Definitive Additional Materials
¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12.

ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

  

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

þNo fee required.

 

¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

 (1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 (2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

  

 

 (3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

  

 (4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

  

 (5)Total fee paid:

  

 

 

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 (1)Amount Previously Paid:

 

  

 

 (2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

  

 

 (3)Filing Party:

  

 

 

 (4)Date Filed:

 

  


ALLEGHANY CORPORATIONLOGO

7 Times Square Tower

New York, New York 10036

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

April 27, 2012 at 10:00 a.m., Local Time

Harvard Club of New York City

March 17, 2015

35 West 44thStreet

New York, New York

Alleghany Corporation (“Alleghany”) hereby gives notice that its 20122015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2015 Annual Meeting”) will be held at the Harvard Cluboffices of New York City, 35 West 44its subsidiary Transatlantic Reinsurance Holdings, Inc., One Liberty Plaza, 17th Street, Floor, New York, New York, on Friday, April 27, 201224, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes:purposes:

 1.To elect four directors for terms expiring in 2015.2018.

 

 2.To consider and take action upon a proposal to approve Alleghany’s 2012 Long-Term Incentive2015 Directors’ Stock Plan.

 

 3.To consider and take action upon a proposal to approve Alleghany’s 2015 Management Incentive Plan.

4.To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2012.fiscal 2015.

 

 4.5.To hold an advisory, non-binding vote on executive compensation.

 

 5.6.To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or any adjournment or adjournmentspostponement thereof.

Holders of Alleghany common stock at the close of business on March 14, 20122, 2015 are entitled to receive this Notice and vote for the election of directors and on each of the other matters set forth above at the 20122015 Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements of this meeting.

You are cordially invited to be present. Ifattend the 2015 Annual Meeting. Representation of your shares at the meeting is very important. Whether or not you do not expectplan to attend in person, we encourage you mayto vote your shares promptly by telephone, byusing the Internet, telephone or by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. Representation of your shares is very important. We ask that you submit your proxy promptly. You may revoke your proxy at any time prior to its beingbefore it is voted at the 2015 Annual Meeting by written notice to the Secretary of Alleghany, by submitting a new proxy with a later date, or by voting in person at the 20122015 Annual Meeting.

By order of the Board of Directors

CHRISTOPHER K. DALRYMPLE

By order of the Board of Directors,
CHRISTOPHER K. DALRYMPLE

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

March 16, 2012

Counsel and Secretary

Alleghany Corporation

7 Times Square Tower

New York, New York 10036

Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Alleghany Corporation 20122015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on April 27, 2012: Our proxy24, 2015: Proxy materials relating to our 2012the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (notice of meeting, proxy statement, proxy and 20112014 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K) are also available on the Internet. Please go to www.edocumentview.com/YAL to view and obtain the proxy materials online.


ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

7 Times Square Tower

New York, New York 10036

PROXY STATEMENT

2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 27, 2012

Alleghany Corporation, referred to in this proxy statement as “Alleghany,” “we,” “our,” or “us” is providing these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Alleghany, or the “Board,” from holders of Alleghany’s outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or the “2012 Annual Meeting,” and at any and all adjournments or postponements, for the purposes referred to below and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. These proxy materials are being mailed to stockholders on or about March 16, 2012.

References to “common stock” in this proxy statement refer to the common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of Alleghany unless the context otherwise requires.

On March 6, 2012, we completed the acquisition of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. (“Transatlantic”) pursuant to the merger agreement entered into between Alleghany and Transatlantic on November 21, 2011. As part of the consideration for the merger, we issued 8,360,959 shares of our common stock to the former stockholders of Transatlantic. In addition, in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, three former directors of Transatlantic became directors of Alleghany effective upon the closing of the acquisition. One of the three former Transatlantic directors, John G. Foos, was appointed to the class of 2012 and will stand for election to the class of 2015 at the 2012 Annual Meeting.


Information About Voting

Alleghany’s Board has fixed the close of business on March 14, 2012 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 2012 Annual Meeting. Stockholders are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on the record date with respect to each matter to be acted on at the 2012 Annual Meeting. As of the close of business on March 14, 2012, there were 16,926,274 shares of Alleghany common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Alleghany’s common stock is required to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the 2012 Annual Meeting. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” (shares held by a broker or nominee that does not have discretionary authority to vote on a particular matter and has not received voting instructions from its client) are counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business at the 2012 Annual Meeting. Under applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers may not use discretionary authority to vote shares of Alleghany’s common stock held for clients on any of the matters to be considered at the 2012 Annual Meeting other than the ratification of our selection of Ernst & Young LLP, as Alleghany’s independent accounting firm. Accordingly, it is important that, if your shares are held by a broker, you provide instructions to your broker so that your votes with respect to the election of directors, approval of Alleghany’s 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, and the advisory vote on executive compensation are counted.

There are three ways to vote by proxy: by calling the toll free telephone number on the enclosed proxy card, by using the Internet as described on the enclosed proxy card or by returning the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. You may be able to vote by telephone or the Internet if your shares are held by a broker; follow their instructions.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERSQUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT ALLEGHANY’S 2015 ANNUAL MEETING

   1  

ALLEGHANY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

   25  

Board of Directors

   25  

Director Independence

   35  

Board Leadership

   45  

Board Role in Risk Oversight

   45  

Committees of the Board of Directors

   46

Director Nominations and Qualifications

8  

Communications with Directors

   8  

Director Retirement Policy

8

Related Party Transactions

   8  

Codes of Ethics

   9  

Majority Election of Directors

   109  

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

   9

Hedging and Pledging Policies

9

Related Party Transactions

9

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

11

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

�� 12  

SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

   1213  

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

   15  

PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTEEQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

   16

16PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

17  

Proposal 1.Nominees for Election of

18

Other Alleghany Directors

   1619  

Compensation of Directors

   2322  

ProposalPROPOSAL 2. Approval of 2012 Long-Term Incentive PlanAPPROVAL OF THE 2015 DIRECTORS’ STOCK PLAN

   2624  

Equity Compensation Plan InformationPROPOSAL 3. APPROVAL OF THE 2015 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

   3427  

Proposal 3 Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the year 2012PROPOSAL 4. RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL 2015

   3630  

Audit Committee Report

   40

Proposal 4. Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

42

All Other Matters That May Come Before the 2012 Annual Meeting

4531  

PROPOSAL 5. ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE OFFICERSCOMPENSATION

   4632  

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

   4833  

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AND COMPENSATION MATTERS

   4934  

Compensation Philosophy and General DescriptionObjectives

   4934

2014 Compensation Program Component Summary

35

Alleghany Performance in 2014

37

Alleghany Long-Term Performance

37

Compensation Committee Process

40  

Components of 2014 Compensation

��   5242  

Financial Statement Restatements

   5949

Hedging and Pledging Policies

50  

Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines

   6050  

Tax Considerations

   6050  

PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENTCompensation Policies and Practices Relating to Risk Management

   6151  


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

   6652  

Summary Compensation Table

   6652  

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20112014

   6855  

Narrative Discussion Relating to the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

   6956  

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20112014 Fiscal Year-End

   7360  

20112014 Stock Vested

   75

Pension Benefits

7661  

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

   7961


Pension Benefits

63

Payments upon Termination of Employment

65  

STOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS AND PROPOSALS

   82

SHARED ADDRESS STOCKHOLDERS

8267  

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

   68

83EXHIBIT A – 2015 DIRECTORS’ STOCK PLAN

A-1

EXHIBIT B – 2015 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

B-1  


PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERSPROXY STATEMENT

The following table sets forthAlleghany Corporation, referred to in this proxy statement as “Alleghany,” the beneficial ownership“Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us,” is providing these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation of each person who, based upon information provided toproxies by the Board of Directors of Alleghany, or filings made by such person with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,“Board,” from holders of Alleghany’s outstanding shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, or the “SEC,“common stock,wasentitled to vote at our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or the beneficial owner“2015 Annual Meeting,” and at any and all adjournments or postponements thereof, for the purposes referred to herein and in the accompanying Notice of more than five percent our outstanding common stock.Annual Meeting of Stockholders. These proxy materials are being mailed to stockholders on or about March 17, 2015.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT ALLEGHANY’S 2015 ANNUAL MEETING

  Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1) 

Name and Address

of Beneficial Owner

 Sole Voting
Power and/or  Sole
Investment Power
  Shared Voting Power
and/or Shared
Investment Power
  Total  Percent
of Class
 

Davis Selected Advisers, LP

  2,707,923        2,707,923(2)   16.0  

2949 East Elvira Road,

Suite 101, Tuscon,

AZ 85706

    

Artisan Partners Limited Partnership

      859,584    859,584(3)   5.1  

875 E. Wisconsin Avenue,

Suite 800, Milwaukee, WI 53202

    

 

(1)Q:The stock ownership information inWho is entitled to vote at the table is as of March 12, 2012.2015 Annual Meeting?

 

(2)A:Davis Selected Advisors, LP, an investment adviser (“Davis Advisors”)Alleghany has advised Alleghany,one class of voting stock outstanding: its common stock. If you were a holder of common stock at the close of business on behalfMarch 2, 2015, the record date for the 2015 Annual Meeting, you are entitled to vote at the meeting. At the close of itself and its affiliate Davis New York Venture Fund, a registered investment company, that Davis Advisors has sole voting power over 2,482,457business on March 2, 2015, there were 16,006,914 shares of common stock no voting power over 225,466 sharesoutstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of common stock and sole dispositive power over 2,707,923has one vote.

Q:How can I vote my shares?

A:You can vote your shares in two ways: either by proxy or in person at the 2015 Annual Meeting by written ballot. If you choose to vote by proxy, you may do so using the Internet, telephone or, if you received a printed copy of common stock. Davis Advisors has advised Alleghanyyour proxy materials, mail. Each of these procedures is more fully explained below. Even if you plan to attend the 2015 Annual Meeting in person, the Board recommends that you vote promptly by proxy to ensure that your shares are represented at the 2015 Annual Meeting.

Q:How can I vote my shares by proxy?

A:Because many stockholders cannot attend the 2015 Annual Meeting in person, it is necessary that a large number of stockholders be represented by proxy. You may vote your proxy using the Internet, telephone or, if you received a printed copy of your proxy materials, mail, each as more fully explained below. In the case of voting your proxy using the Internet or telephone, the deadline for voting is 1:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on Friday, April 24, 2015. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, please see the voting instructions provided by such party.

Vote by InternetTo vote your shares via the Internet, go to the voting website, www.envisionreports.com/YAL. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You will have the opportunity to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. Our Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders through individual control numbers. If you vote via the internet, you may incur costs such as Internet access fees for investment purposes on behalf of client accounts over which Davis Advisors has either soleyou will be responsible.If you received a proxy card in the mail and choose to vote via the Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card.
Vote by TelephoneIf you reside in the United States, Canada or shared discretionary dispositive or voting power, that beneficial ownershipPuerto Rico, you can vote your shares by telephone by calling the toll-free number provided on the part of Davis Advisorsvoting website www.envisionreports.com/YAL and on the proxy card. Telephone voting is expressly disclaimed, as permitted by Rule 13d-4 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that all purchases of shares were made for investment purposes only andyour instructions have been properly recorded. Our telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders through individual control numbers.If you received a proxy card in the ordinary course of business of Davis Advisors as a registered investment advisor. To satisfy the requirements of certain insurance regulatory authorities, on February 27, 2012, Davis Advisors entered into a binding agreement with Alleghany whereby Davis Advisors agreedmail and choose to vote by telephone, you do not need to return your proxy card.
Vote by MailIf you received a printed copy of your proxy materials, you can vote your shares by completing and mailing the number of shares of Alleghany over which Davis Advisors holds voting power in excess of 9.9% of Alleghany’s outstanding shares in a manner proportionateenclosed proxy card to us so that we receive it by the vote of the owners of Alleghany shares (excluding Davis Advisors, stockholders beneficially owning more than 10% of outstanding Alleghany shares, and directors and officers of Alleghany) voting on such matters.deadline.

-1-


If you properly sign and return your proxy card or submit your proxy using the Internet or telephone, your shares will be voted as you direct. If you sign and return your proxy card but do not specify how to vote, we will vote your shares in accordance with the Board’s recommendations: “FOR” each of the Board’s nominees for director; “FOR” the adoption of the 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan; “FOR” the adoption of the 2015 Management Incentive Plan; “FOR” the ratification of the selection of the independent registered public accounting; and “FOR” the advisory resolution on executive compensation.

(3)Q:AccordingHow can I vote my shares in person?

A:If you wish to an amendment dated February 6, 2012vote at the 2015 Annual Meeting, written ballots will be available at the meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from that holder of record to be able to vote at the meeting. Voting by proxy, whether by Internet, telephone or mail, will not limit your right to vote at the 2015 Annual Meeting if you decide to attend in person. However, if you vote by proxy and also attend the meeting, there is no need to vote in person at the meeting unless you wish to change your vote.

Q:Are there any rules regarding admission to the 2015 Annual Meeting?

A:Each stockholder and guest will need to present valid government-issued identification, such as a Schedule 13G statement filed jointlydriver’s license or passport, to building security at One Liberty Plaza, the location of the 2015 Annual Meeting, before being admitted to the building. The meeting will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) and you should leave yourself time for building security procedures.

Q:Can I change my vote?

A:Yes. You can change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised at the 2015 Annual Meeting by Artisan Partners Limited Partnership, an investment adviser (“Artisan Partners”), Artisan Investment Corporation,taking any one of the general partnerfollowing actions: (1) follow the instructions given for changing your vote via the Internet or by telephone or deliver a valid written proxy with a later date than the previous proxy; (2) notify the Secretary of Artisan Partners (“Artisan Corp.”), ZFIC, Inc.,Alleghany in writing that you have revoked your proxy (using the sole stockholderaddress in the Notice of Artisan Corp. (“ZFIC”), and Andrew A. Ziegler and Carlene M. Ziegler,Annual Meeting of Stockholders above); or (3) vote in person by written ballot at the principal stockholders2015 Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in the name of ZFIC (who, together with Artisan Partners, Artisan Corp. and ZFIC, are referreda bank, broker or other holder of record, you must contact that holder of record to herein as “Artisan Parties”),revoke a previously authorized proxy.

Q:How many shares must be present to conduct the Artisan Parties share voting and dispositive power over 838,6482015 Annual Meeting?

A:A quorum comprising the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Alleghany’s common stock on the record date must be present in person or represented by proxy for the transaction of business at the 2015 Annual Meeting. Abstentions and share dispositive power over“broker non-votes” (which are explained below) are counted as present to determine whether there is a quorum for the 2015 Annual Meeting.

Q:What if I am a beneficial owner and do not give instructions to my broker?

A:If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares, but not the record holder. As a beneficial owner, in order to ensure your shares are voted in the way you would like, you must provide voting instructions to your broker by the deadline provided in the proxy materials you receive from your broker. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, or the “NYSE,” unless you provide specific voting instructions, your broker is not permitted to vote your shares on your behalf, except with respect to the ratification of the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 4). For your vote on any other matter to be counted, you will need to provide voting instructions to your broker before the date of the 2015 Annual Meeting using the instructions provided by your broker.

-2-


A “broker non-vote” occurs when your broker submits a proxy for your shares but does not indicate a vote for a particular proposal because the broker does not have authority to vote on that proposal and has not received voting instructions from you. “Broker non-votes” are counted as present to determine whether there is a quorum for the 2015 Annual Meeting, but are not counted as votes for or against the proposal in question or as abstentions, nor are they counted to determine the number of votes present for the particular proposal.

Q:What vote is required to pass each of the proposals at the 2015 Annual Meeting?

A:Proposal 1: Election of Directors. Each of the four nominees for director who receives at least a majority of the votes cast with respect to the election of such nominee will be elected. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote. In accordance with the majority voting standard in Alleghany’s By-Laws and the Corporate Governance Guidelines of Alleghany, or the “Corporate Governance Guidelines,” as a condition of his or her nomination, each nominee is required to tender to the Board at the time of nomination an additional 21,206 shares of common stock. The statement indicatedirrevocable resignation, effective if such nominee does not receive the majority vote required by the By-Laws and the Board determines to accept such resignation. In the event that such shares had been acquired on behalf of discretionary clients of Artisan Partners, persons other than Artisan Partners are entitleda director nominee fails to receive all dividends fromthe requisite majority vote, the Nominating and proceeds from the sale ofGovernance Committee will evaluate such shares,resignation and make a recommendation to the knowledge ofBoard as to whether it should accept the Artisan Parties none of such persons has an economic interest in more than 5% of the class.resignation.

Proposal 2: Adoption of the 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal is required to adopt the 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan. Abstentions will have the effect of votes against this proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote.

Proposal 3: Adoption of the 2015 Management Incentive Plan. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal is required to adopt the 2015 Management Incentive Plan. Abstentions will have the effect of votes against this proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote.

Proposal 4: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal is required to ratify the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote.

Proposal 5: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal is required to approve the advisory resolution on executive compensation. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote. Although this proposal is non-binding on the Board, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions about Alleghany’s executive compensation program.

Q:How does the Board recommend I vote?

A:The Board recommends that you vote as follows on each proposal:

  Voting MatterBoard’s Recommendation

  Proposal 1: Election of Directors

FOR each director nominee    

  Proposal 2: Adoption of the 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan

FOR

  Proposal 3: Adoption of the 2015 Management Incentive Plan

FOR

  Proposal 4: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered

                          Public Accounting Firm

FOR

  Proposal 5: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

FOR

Q:What happens if a nominee for director does not stand for election?

A:If for any reason any nominee does not stand for election, any proxies we receive will be voted in favor of the remaining nominees and may be voted for a substitute nominee in place of the nominee who does not stand. We have no reason to expect that any of the nominees will not stand for election.

-3-


Q:What happens if additional matters are presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting?

A:If any matters other than the five items of business described in this proxy statement are properly presented for consideration at the 2015 Annual Meeting, persons named on the voting website and your proxy card will have discretion to vote for you on those matters. At the time this proxy statement was printed, we knew of no other matters to be raised at the 2015 Annual Meeting.

Q:Who nominates the directors?

A:John G. Foos, William K. Lavin, Phillip M. Martineau and Raymond L.M. Wong have been nominated by the Board for election as directors at the 2015 Annual Meeting. Each of the nominees is a current member of the Board and was recommended to the Board for nomination by the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee will receive at any time and will consider from time to time suggestions from stockholders as to proposed director candidates, as described under “Director Nominations and Qualifications” on page 8. Additionally, stockholders may nominate individuals for election as directors in accordance with the requirements set forth in Alleghany’s By-Laws and described under “Stockholder Nominations and Proposals” on page 67.

Q:How are proxies solicited and what is the cost?

A:We pay the cost of soliciting proxies for the meeting. Proxies may be solicited in person by our employees, or by mail, courier, telephone, facsimile or e-mail. In addition, we have retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies by mail, courier, telephone, facsimile and e-mail. We expect to pay a fee of approximately $9,000 to Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. plus expenses for these services.

Q:What is householding? Does Alleghany use it?

A:In accordance with a notice sent to eligible stockholders who share a single address, we are sending only one annual report to stockholders and one proxy statement to that address unless we received instructions to the contrary from any stockholder at that address. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs.

If, in the future, you wish to receive a separate annual report to stockholders and proxy statement, a separate copy may be obtained, without charge, upon written or oral request to the office of the Secretary, Alleghany Corporation, 7 Times Square Tower, New York, New York 10036, telephone number (212) 752-1356. Eligible stockholders of record who receive multiple copies of our annual report to stockholders and proxy statement can request householding by contacting us in the same manner. Stockholders who own shares through a bank, broker or other nominee can request householding by contacting the nominee. We hereby undertake to deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the annual report to stockholders and proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered.

Q:Where can I find more information about Alleghany?

A:Alleghany’s website address is www.alleghany.com. Alleghany makes available, free of charge on its website, the documents it files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the “SEC.” Also available on Alleghany’s website are its Financial Personnel Code of Ethics, Employee Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the charters for the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees. The information contained on Alleghany’s website is not included as a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement.

-4-


ALLEGHANY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board of Directors

Pursuant to Alleghany’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws, Alleghany’sthe Board is divided into three separate classes of directors which are required to be as nearly equal in number as practicable. At each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, one class of directors is elected to a term of three years. Currently, there are three standing committees of the Board, consisting of an Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee. Additional information regarding these committees is set out below.on pages 6 through 8.

Alleghany’sThe Board currently consists of fourteeneleven directors. Upon the closing of the acquisition of Transatlantic on March 6, 2012, in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, three former members of the board of directors of Transatlantic, Stephen P. Bradley, Ian H. Chippendale and John G. Foos, were appointedMr. Rex D. Adams, who has served as directors of Alleghany, with one of such new directors being appointed to each of the Board’s three classes (Mr. Foos to the class of 2012, Mr. Bradley to the class of 2013, and Mr. Chippendale to the class of 2014). Consequently, there are currently five members of the Board whose terms will expire at the 2012 Annual Meeting: John J. Burns, Jr., Dan R. Carmichael, Mr. Foos, William K. Lavin and Raymond L.M. Wong. Mr. Burns, a director of Alleghany (or its predecessor, Alleghany Corporation, a Maryland corporation, which we refer to as “Old Alleghany”) since 1968, has not been nominated for re-election as a director of Alleghany. In addition, Dan R. Carmichael, a director of Alleghany since 1993, notified Alleghany on February 23, 2012 of his intention to retire as a director of Alleghany1999, is retiring from the Board effective as ofat the 20122015 Annual Meeting and, thus, he also has not been nominated for re-electionin accordance with Alleghany’s director retirement policy as a director of Alleghany.

Because two directors whose terms expire at the 2012 Annual Meeting have not been nominated for re-election, in order to make the classes of the Board as nearly equal in size as practicable, the Board has determined to nominate Phillip M. Martineau, who was last elected to the Board at the 2010 Annual Meeting, to stand for re-election at the 2012 Annual Meeting.described on page 8. As a result, the directors that have been nominated by the Board for election at the 2012 Annual Meeting to the class of 2015 are Messrs. Foos, Lavin, Martineau, and Wong. Since Messrs. Burns and Carmichael have not been nominated for re-election at the 2012 Annual Meeting, if all of Messrs. Foos, Lavin, Martineau and Wongthe nominees for director are elected, the size of the Board will be reduced effective at the 20122015 Annual Meeting from fourteeneleven to twelveten directors.

The Board held 10eight meetings in 2011.2014. Each director who served as a director of Alleghany any time during 20112014 attended more than 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees of the Board on which he or she served that were held in 2011. There are two regularly scheduled executive2014. Executive sessions for non-management directors of Alleghany and one regularly scheduled executive session for independent directors are held at each year.regularly scheduled Board meeting. The Chairman of the Board, or the “Chairman,” who is currently an independent director, presides at these executive sessions. Alleghany does not have a policy with regard to attendance by directors at Annual Meetings of Stockholders. ThreeTwo directors attended the 20112014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Director Independence

Pursuant to the New York Stock Exchange’sNYSE’s listing standards, Alleghany is required to have a majority of independent directors, and no director qualifies as independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with Alleghany. The Board has determined that Rex D. Adams, Stephen P. Bradley, Karen Brenner, Dan R. Carmichael, Ian H. Chippendale, John G. Foos, Jefferson W. Kirby, William K. Lavin, Thomas S. Johnson, Phillip M. Martineau, James F. Will (who retired from the Board effective at the 2014 Annual Meeting held on April 25, 2014) and Raymond L.M. Wong have no material relationship with Alleghany (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with Alleghany) other than in their capacities as members of the Board and committees thereof, and thus are independent directors of Alleghany, based upon the fact that none of such directors has any material relationship with Alleghany either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with Alleghany. As a result, twelveten of Alleghany’s current fourteeneleven directors are independent directors. All of the director nominees, Messrs. Foos, Lavin, Martineau and Wong, are independent. Assuming that all of Messrs. Foos, Lavin, Martineau and Wong are elected at the 20122015 Annual Meeting, the size of the Board will be reduced effective at the 2012 Annual Meetingsuch meeting as a result of Mr. Adams’ retirement from fourteeneleven to twelveten directors, and elevennine of Alleghany’s twelveten directors will be independent directors.

Board Leadership

Currently, the positionsposition of Chairman and the position of President and chief executive officer are separate. It is the policy of the Board that the Chairman should not be an Alleghany officer. The current Chairman is an independent director. Pursuant to the Corporate Governance Guidelines, of Alleghany, or the “Corporate Governance Guidelines,” the duties of the Chairman include providing leadership to the Board in managing the business of the Board and ensuring that there is an effective structure for the operation of the Board and its committees. The Board believes that its leadership structure is appropriate given the historical development of the composition of the Board and management, the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the significant tenure of a majority of the Board members.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

The Board oversees risk management directly and through its Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Governance Committee.committees. In addition, Alleghany management has several committees that it uses group-wide to monitor and manage risk at Alleghany and its subsidiaries, including aan Enterprise Risk Management Committee, Reinsurance Security Committee Investment Committeeand Ethics and Legal

-5-


Compliance Committee. Alleghany management regularly reports to the Board and, as appropriate, to the committees of the Board on management’s activities and risk tolerances. Each year, at the Board’s December or January meeting, the Board receives a formal report on enterprise risk management from Alleghany’s chief risk officer and, at the same meeting, considers Alleghany’s five-year strategic planthree-year financial estimates and the evaluation of the President and chief executive officer, allowing the Board to consider risk and risk management in the context of theAlleghany’s strategic plan and management’s performance. AtEach year, at the Audit Committee’s June meeting, it receives a formal report on enterprise risk management from Alleghany’s chief risk officer and a formal report on legal compliance from Alleghany’s chief compliance officer, which isare also copied to the Board, and the Audit Committeechief risk officer and chief compliance officer subsequently reportsreport thereon to the Board. The Board receives updates on material developments with respect to risk management and legal compliance matters at its other regularly scheduled meetings. The Compensation Committee regularly monitors compensation policies, practices and outstanding awards to determine whether Alleghany’s risk management and incentive objectives are being met with respect to group-wide employee incentives. The Board believes that risk oversight is a responsibility of the entire Board, and it does not look to any individual director or committee to lead it in discharging this responsibility.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Audit Committee Membership

The current members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Lavin (Chairman), Adams, Carmichael and Wong and Ms. Brenner.

Audit Committee

Compensation Committee

Nominating and Governance
Committee

Rex D. Adams

Ian H. Chippendale*Rex D. Adams*

Stephen P. Bradley

Thomas S. JohnsonStephen P. Bradley

Karen Brenner

William K. LavinKaren Brenner

John G. Foos

Phillip M. MartineauJohn G. Foos

William K. Lavin*

Raymond L.M. Wong

Thomas S. Johnson

Raymond L.M. Wong

Phillip M. Martineau

*Committee Chair

The Board has determined that each committee member is independent as defined in the NYSE’s listing standards with respect to membership on each committee on which he or she serves. The Board also has determined that each member of these members

the Audit Committee has the qualifications set forth in the New York Stock Exchange’sNYSE’s listing standards regarding financial literacy and accounting or related financial management expertise, and is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC. The Board has also determined that each

Committee Responsibilities and 2014 Meetings

Each of the members of the Audit Committee is independent as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards. The Audit Committeecommittee’s listed below operates pursuant to a Charter, a copy of which is available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com or may be obtained, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Pursuant to its Charter,The number of meetings held by each Committee during 2014 and the Auditprimary functions of each Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the independent registered public accounting firm, including approving in advance all audit services and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee is also directly responsible for the evaluation of such firm’s qualifications, performance and independence. The Audit Committee also reviews and makes reports and recommendations to the Board with respect to the following matters:are as follows:

 

the audited consolidated annual financial statements of Alleghany and its subsidiaries, including Alleghany’s specific disclosures under management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operation and critical accounting estimates, to be included in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K to the SEC and whether to recommend this inclusion;

the unaudited consolidated quarterly financial statements of Alleghany and its subsidiaries, including management’s discussion and analysis thereof, to be included in Alleghany’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q to the SEC;

Alleghany’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management;

the adequacy and effectiveness of Alleghany’s internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures;

the compensation, activities and performance of Alleghany’s internal auditors; and

the quality and acceptability of Alleghany’s accounting policies, including critical accounting estimates and practices and the estimates and assumptions used by management in the preparation of Alleghany’s financial statements.

The Audit Committee held nine meetings in 2011.

Compensation Committee

The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Carmichael (Chairman), Johnson, Lavin, Martineau, Will and Wong, each of whom the Board has determined is

independent as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards. The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to a Charter, a copy of which is available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com or may be obtained, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Alleghany’s executive compensation program is administered by the Compensation Committee. Pursuant to its Charter, the Compensation Committee is, among other things, charged with:

Board Committee/

Number of Meetings Held in 2014

Responsibilities

Audit Committee

Seven meetings held in 2014

•  Directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the independent registered public accounting firm, including approving in advance all audit services and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.

•  Directly responsible for the evaluation of such firm’s qualifications, performance and independence.

 

reviewing and approving the financial goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the chief executive officer;-6-

evaluating the chief executive officer’s performance in light of such goals and objectives; and

determining the chief executive officer’s compensation based on such evaluation.

In addition, the Compensation Committee also is responsible for reviewing


Board Committee/

Number of Meetings Held in 2014

Responsibilities

•  Reviews and makes reports and recommendations to the Board with respect to the following matters:

•  the audited consolidated annual financial statements of Alleghany and its subsidiaries, including Alleghany’s specific disclosures under management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operation, or “MD&A,” and critical accounting estimates, to be included in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC and whether to recommend this inclusion;

•  the unaudited consolidated quarterly financial statements of Alleghany and its subsidiaries, including MD&A, to be included in Alleghany’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC;

•  Alleghany’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management;

•  the adequacy and effectiveness of Alleghany’s internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures;

•  the compensation, activities and performance of Alleghany’s internal auditor; and

•  the quality and acceptability of Alleghany’s accounting policies, including critical accounting estimates and practices and the estimates and assumptions used by management in the preparation of Alleghany’s financial statements.

Compensation Committee

Six meetings held in 2014

•  Administers Alleghany’s executive compensation program, including Alleghany’s 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the “2007 LTIP,” 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the “2012 LTIP,” and 2010 Management Incentive Plan, or the “2010 MIP.”

•  Reviews and approves the financial goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the chief executive officer; evaluates the chief executive officer’s performance in light of such goals and objectives; and determines the chief executive officer’s compensation based on such evaluation.

•  Reviews the annual recommendations of the chief executive officer concerning:

•  the compensation of the other Alleghany officers and proposed adjustments to such officers’ compensation; and

•  the adjustments proposed to be made to the compensation of the three most highly paid officers of each Alleghany operating subsidiary as recommended by the compensation committee or board of directors (as applicable) for each such operating subsidiary.

•  Reports on the actions described above to the Board and makes recommendations with respect to such actions to the Board as the Compensation Committee may deem appropriate.

•  Reviews the compensation of the directors on an annual basis, including compensation for service on committees of the Board, and proposing changes, as appropriate, to the Board.

 

the compensation of the other Alleghany officers-7-


Board Committee/

Number of Meetings Held in 2014

Responsibilities

Nominating and Governance Committee

Five meetings held in 2014

•  Identifies and screens director candidates, consistent with criteria approved by the Board.

•  Makes recommendations to the Board as to persons to be (i) nominated by the Board for election to the Board by stockholders or (ii) chosen by the Board to fill newly created directorships or vacancies on the Board.

•  Develops and recommends to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to Alleghany.

•  Oversees the evaluation of the Board, individual directors and Alleghany’s management.

Directors Nominations and proposed adjustments to such officers’ compensation; and

the adjustments proposed to be made to the compensation of the three most highly paid officers of each Alleghany operating subsidiary as recommended by the compensation committee for each such operating subsidiary.

The Compensation Committee provides a report on the actions described above to the Board and makes recommendations with respect to such actions to the Board as the Compensation Committee may deem appropriate. Compensation adjustments and awards are generally made annually by the Compensation Committee at a meeting in December or January.Qualifications

In addition, the Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing the compensation of the directors on an annual basis, including compensation for service on committees of the Board, and proposing changes, as appropriate, to the Board. The Compensation Committee also administers Alleghany’s 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the “2002 LTIP,” the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the “2007 LTIP,” the 2010 Management Incentive Plan, or the “2010 MIP,” and, if the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2012 LTIP”) is approved by stockholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting, the Compensation Committee will also administer the 2012 LTIP.

Alleghany’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Christopher K. Dalrymple, supports the Compensation Committee in its work. In addition, during 2011, the

Compensation Committee engaged Grahall Partners, or the “Compensation Consultant,” as independent outside compensation consultant to advise it on executive compensation matters. The Compensation Consultant also advised the Compensation Committee and management on various executive compensation matters involving Alleghany’s operating subsidiaries. The Chairman of the Compensation Committee reviews and approves all fees Alleghany pays to the Compensation Consultant. The Compensation Committee held seven meetings in 2011.

Nominating and Governance Committee

The current members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are Messrs. Adams (Chairman), Johnson, Martineau and Will and Ms. Brenner, each of whom the Board has determined is independent as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards. The Nominating and Governance Committee operates pursuant to a Charter, a copy of which is available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com or may be obtained, without charge, upon written requestidentifies and recommends candidates for election to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Pursuant to its Charter, the Nominating and Governance Committee is charged with:

identifying and screening director candidates,Board, consistent with criteria approved by the Board;

making recommendationsBoard. The Board has not approved any specific criteria that must be met by each director nominee nor established a procedure for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. The Board believes that establishing such criteria is best left to an evaluation of Alleghany’s needs at the Board as to personstime that a nomination is to be (i) nominated byconsidered. The Board generally seeks members with diverse business and professional backgrounds and outstanding integrity and judgment, and such other skills and experience as will enhance the BoardBoard’s ability to best serve Alleghany’s interests. As a general matter, the Nominating and Governance Committee does consider diversity in identifying and evaluating possible nominees for election to the Board by stockholders or (ii) chosen by the Board to fill newly created directorships or vacancies on the Board;director.

developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to Alleghany; and

overseeing the evaluation of the Board, individual directors and Alleghany’s management.

The Nominating and Governance Committee will receive at any time and will consider from time to time suggestions from stockholders as to proposed director candidates. In this regard, a stockholder may submit a recommendation regarding a proposed director nominee in writing to the Nominating and Governance Committee in care of the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Any such persons recommended by a stockholder will be evaluated in the same manner as persons identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee.

The Board generally seeks members with diverse business and professional backgrounds and outstanding integrity and judgment, and such other skills and experience as will enhance

the Board’s ability to best serve Alleghany’s interests. The Board has not approved any specific criteria for nominees for director and believes that establishing such criteria is best left to an evaluation of Alleghany’s needs at the time that a nomination is to be considered. In view of the infrequency of vacancies on the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee does not have an established procedure for identifying and evaluating nominees for director or any specific qualities, skills or minimum qualifications that it believes are necessary for one or more of Alleghany’s directors to possess. However, as a general matter, the Nominating and Governance Committee does consider diversity in identifying and evaluating possible nominees for director

The Nominating and Governance Committee held five meetings in 2011.

Communications with Directors

Interested parties may communicate directly with any individual director, the non-managementindependent directors as a group or the Board as a whole by mailing such communication to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Any such communications will be delivered unopened:

 

if addressed to a specific director, to such director;

 

if addressed to the non-managementindependent directors, to the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee who will report thereon to the non-managementindependent directors; or

 

if addressed to the Board, to the Chairman of the Board who will report thereon to the Board.

Director Retirement Policy

Alleghany’s retirement policy for directors who will be in office following the 2012 Annual Meeting provides that a director must retire from the Board at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders following his or her 75th birthday.

-8-


Codes of Ethics

Alleghany has adopted an Employee Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all employees of Alleghany and its subsidiaries, a Financial Personnel Code of Ethics for its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer and all other officers in its Finance Department, a Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for members of the Board, and the Corporate Governance Guidelines. A copy of each of these documents is available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com or may be obtained, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Alleghany will disclose on its website any substantive amendments to its codes of ethics and any waivers from the provisions of its codes of ethics made with respect to its chief executive officer, chief financial officer or chief accounting officer (or persons performing similar functions), as well as with respect to any other executive officer or any director of Alleghany.

Majority Election of Directors

Alleghany’s By-Laws provide for a majority voting standard for the election of directors for uncontested elections. In connection with such provision of the By-Laws, the Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a director nominee, as a condition of his or her nomination, shall tender to the Board at the time of nomination, an irrevocable resignation effective if such nominee fails to receive the majority vote required by the By-Laws and the Board determines to accept such resignation. In the event that a director nominee fails to receive the requisite majority vote, the Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate such resignation in light of Alleghany’s best interests and make a recommendation to the Board as to whether it should accept the resignation. In making its recommendation, the Nominating and Governance Committee may consider any factors it deems relevant, including:

the director’s qualifications;

the director’s past and expected future contributions to Alleghany;

the overall composition of the Board; and

whether accepting the tendered resignation would cause Alleghany to fail to meet any applicable rule or regulation, including the NYSE’s listing standards and federal securities laws.

The Board, by vote of independent directors other than the director whose resignation is being evaluated, will act on the tendered resignation and will publicly disclose its decision and rationale within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Directors are expected to achieve ownership of common stock, or equivalent common stock units, having an aggregate value (based upon the higher of market value or book value) equal to at least five times the annual board retainer within five years of election to the Board, and to maintain such a level thereafter.

Hedging and Pledging Policies

Alleghany maintains a policy on insider trading and compliance that prohibits directors from directly or indirectly purchasing or using financial instruments designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Alleghany securities that they own. In addition, under such policy, directors are prohibited from pledging Alleghany securities as collateral.

Related Party Transactions

The Board has adopted a written Related Party Transaction Policy, or “the Policy.” Pursuant to the Policy, all related party transactions must be approved in advance by the Board. Under the Policy, a related party

-9-


transaction means any transaction, other than compensation

for services as an officer or director authorized and approved by the Compensation Committee or the Board, in which Alleghany or any of its subsidiaries is a participant and in which any:any of the following persons has or will have a direct or indirect material interest:

 

any director or officer of AlleghanyAlleghany; or

 

any immediate family member of such director or officer, which means any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law or sister-in-law and any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of such director or officer,officer.

has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. A person who has a position or relationship with a firm, corporation or other entity may be deemed to have an indirect interest in any transaction in which that entity engages. However, a person is not deemed to have an interest if such interest arises only from such person’s position as a director of another corporation and/or such person’s direct and indirect ownership of less than 10% of the equity of such firm, corporation or other entity.

Under the Policy, all newly proposed related party transactions are referred to the Nominating and Governance Committee for review and consideration of its recommendation to the Board. Following this review, the related party transaction and the Nominating and Governance Committee’s analysis and recommendations are presented to the full Board (other than any directors interested in the transaction) for approval. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews existing related party transactions annually, with the goals of ensuring that such transactions are being pursued in accordance with all of the understandings and commitments made at the time they were approved, ensuring that payments being made with respect to such transactions are appropriately reviewed and documented, and reaffirming that such transactions remain in the best interests of Alleghany. The Nominating and Governance Committee reports any such findings to the Board.

Upon

-10-


PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth the closingbeneficial ownership of each person who, based upon filings made by such person with the SEC, as of March 2, 2015, was the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the acquisition of Transatlantic on March 6, 2012, Joseph P. Brandon was named an Executive Vice President of Alleghany. During the period from September 15, 2011 through the closing date, Mr. Brandon was engaged by Alleghany as a consultant. Mr. Brandon was paid consulting fees of $253,333 during fiscal 2011.outstanding common stock.

   Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common  Stock(1) 

Name and Address

of Beneficial Owner

  Sole Voting
Power and/or Sole
Investment Power
   Shared Voting Power
and/or Shared
Investment Power
   Total  Percent of
Class
 

BlackRock, Inc.

   1,221,973          1,221,973(2)   7.6  

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

       

Artisan Partners Limited Partnership

        990,527     990,527(3)   6.2  

875 E. Wisconsin Avenue

Suite 800

Milwaukee, WI 53202

       

The Vanguard Group

   924,482     13,601     938,083(4)   5.8  

100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, PA 19355

       

(1)As of March 2, 2015, there were 16,006,914 shares of common stock outstanding.

(2)According to an amendment dated January 12, 2015 to a Schedule 13G statement filed by BlackRock, Inc., an investment advisory company (“BlackRock”), BlackRock has sole voting power over 1,110,181 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 1,221,973 shares of common stock.

(3)According to an amendment dated January 30, 2015 to a Schedule 13G statement filed jointly by Artisan Partners Limited Partnership, an investment adviser (“Artisan Partners”), Artisan Partners Holdings LP (“Artisan Holdings”), Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc., the general partner of Artisan Holdings (“APAM”), Artisan Investments GP LLC, the general partner of Artisan Partners (“Artisan Investments”) and Artisan Partners Funds, Inc. (“Artisan Funds” and, together with Artisan Partners, Artisan Holdings, APAM and Artisan Investments, the “Artisan Parties”), the Artisan Parties share voting and dispositive power over 946,352 shares of common stock and share dispositive power over an additional 44,175 shares of common stock. The statement indicated that such shares had been acquired on behalf of discretionary clients of Artisan Partners, persons other than Artisan Partners are entitled to receive all dividends from and proceeds from the sale of such shares and, to the knowledge of the Artisan Parties, none of such persons has an economic interest in more than five percent of the common stock.

(4)According to a Schedule 13G statement dated February 9, 2015 filed by The Vanguard Group, an investment adviser (“Vanguard”), Vanguard has sole voting power over 15,301 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power over 924,482 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power over 13,601 shares of common stock.

-11-


Codes of EthicsEXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Alleghany has adopted a Financial Personnel Code of Ethics for its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, vice president for tax mattersThe name, age, current position, date elected and all professionals serving in a finance, accounting, treasury or tax role, a Code of Ethics and

Business Conduct for its directors, officers and employees, and the Corporate Governance Guidelines. Copiesprior business experience of each of these documents are available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.comexecutive officers, or may be obtained, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Alleghany will disclose on its website any substantive amendments to these Codes of Ethics and any waivers from the provisions of these Codes of Ethics made with respect to its chief executive officer, chief financial officer or chief accounting officer (or persons performing similar functions)“Named Executive Officers,” is as well as with respect to any other executive officer or any director of Alleghany.

Majority Election of Directors

Alleghany’s By-Laws provide for a majority voting standard for the election of directors for uncontested elections. In connection with such provision of the By-Laws, the Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a director nominee, as a condition of his or her nomination, shall tender to the Board, at the time of nomination, an irrevocable resignation in the event that the director fails to receive the majority vote required by the By-Laws, effective upon the Board’s acceptance of such resignation. In the event that a director nominee fails to receive the requisite majority vote, the Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate such resignation in light of Alleghany’s best interests and make a recommendation to the Board as to whether the Board should accept the resignation. In making its recommendation, the Nominating and Governance Committee may consider any factors it deems relevant, including:follows:

 

the director’s qualifications;

Name

AgeCurrent Position (date elected)

Prior Business Experience

Weston M. Hicks58President and chief executive
officer (since December
2004)
Executive Vice President, Alleghany (October 2002 to December 2004).
Joseph P. Brandon56Executive Vice President
(since March 2012)

Consultant to Alleghany

(September 2011 to March 2012); private investor (May 2008 to August 2011); Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, General Re Corporation, a property and casualty reinsurer and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (September 2001 to April 2008).

Christopher K. Dalrymple47Senior Vice President (since
January 2012) — General
Counsel (since July 2009)
and Secretary (since January
2011)

Vice President, Alleghany (December 2004 to January 2012) — Associate

General Counsel, Alleghany (March 2002 to July 2009) and Assistant Secretary, Alleghany (March 2002 to January 2011).

Roger B. Gorham52Senior Vice President —
Head of Fixed Income and
Treasurer (since May 2013)

Senior Vice President — Finance

and Investments and chief financial officer, Alleghany (January 2006 to May 2013); Senior Vice President — Finance and chief financial officer, Alleghany (May 2005 to January 2006); Senior Vice President — Finance, Alleghany (December 2004 to May 2005).

John L. Sennott, Jr.49Senior Vice President
(since April 2013) and chief
financial officer (since May
2013)
Consultant (April 2012 to April 2013); Executive Vice President and Chief Corporate Strategy Officer (January 2010 to April 2012) and Chief Operating Officer (October 2008 to January 2010), Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG, a property and casualty (re)insurer.

 

the director’s past and expected future contributions to Alleghany;

the overall composition of the Board; and

whether accepting the tendered resignation would cause Alleghany to fail to meet any applicable rule or regulation (including New York Stock Exchange listing standards and federal securities laws).

The Board, by vote of independent directors other than the director whose resignation is being evaluated, will act on the tendered resignation and will publicly disclose its decision and rationale within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote.

-12-

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Directors are expected to achieve ownership of common stock, or equivalent common stock units, having an aggregate value (based upon the higher of market value or book value) equal to at least five times the annual board retainer within five years of election to the Board, and to maintain such a level thereafter.


SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth, as of March12, 2012,March 2, 2015, the beneficial ownership of common stock of each of the nominees named for election as a director, each of the other current directors, each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 66,52 and all nominees, directors and executive officers as a group, except for Robert M. Hart who retired as Senior Vice President—Law on April 30, 2011.group.

 

 Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership       Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
of Common Stock
 

Name of Beneficial Owner

 Sole Voting
Power and/or Sole
Investment Power
 Shared Voting  Power
and/or Shared
Investment Power
   Total Percent
of Class
   Sole Voting
Power and/or  Sole
Investment Power
   Shared Voting Power
and/or Shared
Investment Power
   Total  Percent
of Class
 

John G. Foos

  648         648    *  

William K. Lavin

  8,873         8,873(1)   *  

Phillip M. Martineau

  1,471         1,471(1)   *  

Raymond L.M. Wong

  6,162         6,162(1)(2)   *  

Rex D. Adams

  7,919         7,919(1)   *     7,411          7,411   (1)   *  

Stephen P. Bradley

               *     1,407          1,407   (1)   *  

Joseph P. Brandon

   12,123     9,955     22,078   (2)   *  

Karen Brenner

  1,762         1,762(1)   *     3,672          3,672   (1)   *  

John J. Burns, Jr.

  58,249         58,249(1)(3)   *  

Dan R. Carmichael

  23,851         23,851(1)(4)   *  

Ian H. Chippendale

               *     1,407          1,407   (1)   *  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

   35     2,965     3,000   (3)   *  

John G. Foos

   1,407     648     2,055   (1)(4)   *  

Roger B. Gorham

   7,150          7,150      *  

Weston M. Hicks

  65,638         65,638(5)   *     46,751     18,919     65,670   (5)   *  

Thomas S. Johnson

  8,805         8,805(1)   *     9,865          9,865   (1)   *  

Jefferson W. Kirby

  75,375    396,112     471,487(1)(6)   2.79     91,874     396,859     488,733   (1)(6)   3.05  

James F. Will

  19,090    1,716     20,806(1)(7)   *  

Roger B. Gorham

  9,914         9,914(8)   *  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  1,577      1,577    *  

Jerry G. Borrelli

  1,325         1,325    *  

John Carr

  663         663(9)   *  

All nominees, directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons)

  291,722    397,828     689,550(10)   4.06(11) 

William K. Lavin

   6,530          6,530   (1)   *  

Phillip M. Martineau

   3,781          3,781   (1)   *  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

   2,269          2,269      *  

Raymond L.M. Wong

   7,862     1,500     9,362   (1)(7)   *  

All nominees, directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)

   203,544     430,846     634,390      3.95(8) 

 

*represents less than 1.0%

 

(1)

Includes 6,7294,217 shares of common stock in the case of Messrs. Adams, Johnson and Lavin, Carmichael and Will, 5073,654 shares of common stock in the case of Mr. Kirby and Mr. Wong, 1,510 shares of common stock in the case of Ms. Brenner and Mr. Martineau and Ms. Brenner, 2,651500 shares of common stock in the case of Messrs. WongBradley, Chippendale and Kirby, 4,363 shares of common stock in the

case of Mr. Adams, 2,102 shares of common stock in the case of Mr. Burns, and 5,534 shares of common stock in the case of Mr. Johnson,Foos, issuable under stock options granted pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2010 Directors’ Stock Plan or the(the “2010 Directors’ Plan,”Plan”) and the 2005 Directors’ Stock Plan or the(the “2005 Directors’ Plan,” and the 2000 Directors’ Stock Option Plan, or the “2000 Directors’ Plan.” In addition, includes 250 shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units granted to each of Messrs. Lavin, Martineau, Wong, Adams, Carmichael, Johnson, Kirby and Will and Ms. Brenner pursuant to the 2010 Directors’ Plan, which shares are subject to a one-year vesting period that will end on April 27, 2012.Plan”).

 

(2)Does not include any shares that may be issued upon the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units held by Mr. Brandon. Includes 2009,925 shares of common stock ownedheld jointly with Mr. Brandon’s spouse, over which Mr. Brandon shares voting and investment power. Includes 30 shares of common stock held by Mr. Wong’s children.Brandon’s children, over which Mr. Brandon shares investment power, and for which he disclaims beneficial ownership.

 

(3)Includes 2,2422,965 shares of common stock held by a trust ofjointly with Mr. Dalrymple’s spouse, over which Mr. Burns’ wife is sole trusteeDalrymple shares voting and 335 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Burns’ wife. Mr. Burns had no voting or investment power over these shares, and he disclaims beneficial ownership of them.power.

 

(4)Includes 262648 shares of common stock owned byheld jointly with Mr. Carmichael’s wife.Foos’ spouse, over which Mr. Carmichael had noFoos shares voting orand investment power over these shares, and he disclaims beneficial ownership of them.power.

 

(5)Includes 29,87718,919 shares of common stock representing a restricted stock award and subsequent stock dividends in respect thereof, which are subject to Mr. Hicks’ continuing employment with Alleghany and the achievement of certain performance goals, but does not include any shares that may be paid pursuant to outstanding restricted stock units held by trusts over which Mr. Hicks.Hicks has voting and investment control.

 

(6)

Includes 159,097 shares of common stock held by a trusttrusts of which Mr. Kirby is co-trustee and beneficiary and shares voting and investment power as to such shares; 27,586 shares as to which Mr. Kirby is sole trustee and beneficiary. Also includesbeneficiary and over which Mr. Kirby has sole voting and investment power; and 237,015 shares held by the Estate of Fred M. Kirby II. Mr. Kirby is co-executor of the Estate of Fred M. Kirby II Residuary Trust. Mr. Kirby is co-trustee of the Fred M. Kirby II Residuary

-13-


Trust and shares voting and investment power as to such shares. Also includes 19 shares held by Mr. Kirby’s spouse, over which Mr. Kirby shares voting and investment power, 728 shares held 75,375by Mr. Kirby’s children, over which Mr. Kirby shares directly, of which 1,081voting and investment power, and 23 shares were held by a limited partnershipliability company with Mr. Kirby exercising sole voting and investment power in respect of such shares.

 

(7)Includes 1,716600 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Wong’s children, over which Mr. Wong shares voting and investment power, and 900 shares of common stock held by a trust of which Mr. Will is co-trustee.Wong shares voting and investment power.

 

(8)Includes 4,095 shares of common stock representing a restricted stock award and subsequent stock dividends in respect thereof, which are subject to Mr. Gorham’s continuing employment with Alleghany and the achievement of certain performance goals.

(9)Includes 60 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Carr’s wife. Mr. Carr had no voting or investment power over these shares, and he disclaims beneficial ownership of them.

(10)Includes a total of2,899 shares of common stock over which certain of the above persons listed had no voting or investment power, as discussed in Notes (3), (4) and (9) above.

(11)Based on the number of shares of outstanding common stock as of March 12, 2012,2, 2015, adjusted in the case of each director to include shares of common stock issuable within 60 days upon exercise of stock options held by such director.

-14-


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Alleghany has determined that, except as set forth below, no person who at any time during 20112014 was a director, officer or beneficial owner of more than 10% of common stock failed to file on a timely basis reports required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the “Exchange Act,” during 2011.2014. This determination is based solely upon Alleghany’s review of Forms 3, 4 and 5, and written representations that no Form 5 was required, which such persons submitted to Alleghany during or with respect to 2011. John J. Burns, Jr. filed a Form 4 report on July 12, 2011 reporting, among other things, his indirect acquisition of a total of 1,003 shares of common stock on May 16, 2011 as a result of a gift by Mr. Burns to a trust of which his spouse is sole trustee. Phillip2014. Weston M. MartineauHicks filed a Form 4 on April 5, 2011July 1, 2014 reporting his purchase of 300 sharesa transaction that occurred on March 11, 201131, 2014. John L. Sennott, Jr., Christopher K. Dalrymple and his purchase of 150 sharesJerry G. Borrelli each filed a Form 4 on March 28, 2011.February 27, 2014 reporting a transaction that occurred on January 15, 2014.

-15-


PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTEEQUITYCOMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2014, relating to Alleghany’s equity compensation plans under which its equity securities are authorized for issuance:

Plan Category

 (a)
Number of  Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
  (b)
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
  (c)
Number of  Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column
(a))
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)

  183,035(2)  $300.06(3)   527,189(4) 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

            
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  183,035   $300.06    527,189  

(1)These equity compensation plans consist of: (i) the 2005 Directors’ Plan; (ii) the 2010 Directors’ Plan; (iii) the 2007 LTIP and (iv) the 2012 LTIP. The 2005 Directors’ Plan expired on December 31, 2009.

(2)This amount includes: (i)15,117 outstanding stock options issued to directors under the 2005 Directors’ Plan; (ii) 12,570 outstanding stock options issued to directors under the 2010 Directors’ Plan; (iii) 1,852 outstanding restricted stock units issued to directors under the 2005 Directors’ Plan; (iv) 7,023 outstanding restricted stock units issued to directors under the 2010 Directors’ Plan; (v) 57,771 outstanding performance shares issued under the 2007 LTIP assuming payouts at maximum; (vi) 76,195 outstanding performance shares issued under the 2012 LTIP assuming payouts at maximum; (vii) 6,191 outstanding restricted stock units awarded under the 2012 LTIP and (viii) 6,316 outstanding restricted stock units awarded under the 2012 LTIP as a matching grant (the “Matching Grant Restricted Stock Units”). Restricted stock units granted to directors pursuant to the 2005 Directors’ Plan and 2010 Directors’ Plan (the “Director Restricted Stock Units”) are paid out in common stock, with one share of common stock being paid for each Director Restricted Stock Unit. Matching Grant Restricted Stock Units are paid out in cash and/or common stock, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, with one share of common stock or, if payment is made in cash, the market value of one share of common stock on the payment date, being paid for each Matching Grant Restricted Stock Unit. Performance shares outstanding under the 2007 LTIP and 2012 LTIP are paid, at the end of a four-year award period, in a maximum amount equal to one and one-half shares of common stock for each performance share, depending upon the level of performance achieved. Payments in respect of performance shares are made based upon the market value of common stock on the payment date. Recipients of performance shares are permitted to elect to receive payment for performance shares in cash and/or common stock, subject to certain limitations. Since there is no exercise price for restricted stock units or for performance shares, they are not taken into account in calculating the weighted-average exercise price in column (b).

(3)The weighted-average exercise price is based upon the weighted-average exercise price of the outstanding director stock options issued under the 2005 Directors’ Plan and the 2010 Directors’ Plan.

(4)This amount does not include: (i) 577,026 shares of common stock that remained available for issuance under the 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan upon its termination on December 31, 2006; (ii) 188,227 shares of common stock that remained available for issuance under the 2007 LTIP upon its termination on April 27, 2012; or (iii) 27,485 shares of common stock that remained available for issuance under the 2005 Directors’ Plan upon its expiration on December 31, 2009, since no further awards of common stock may be made under any such plan.

-16-


PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Proposal 1.Nominees for Election of Directors

John G. Foos, William K. Lavin, Phillip M. Martineau and Raymond L. M.L.M. Wong have been nominated by the Board for election as directors at the 20122015 Annual Meeting, each to serve for a term of three years, until the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his successor is duly elected and qualified. Following the 2012 Annual Meeting, Messrs. Burns and Carmichael, membersEach of the classnominees is a current member of 2012, will no longer serve as directors of Alleghany.the Board and was recommended to the Board for nomination by the Nominating and Governance Committee. Messrs. Foos, Lavin, Martineau and Wong were last elected by stockholders at the 20092012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 24, 2009. Mr. Martineau was last elected to the Board at the 2010 Annual Meeting held on April 23, 2010, and has been added by the Board to the class of directors standing for re-election at the 2012 Annual Meeting in order to make the classes of the Board are as nearly equal in size as practicable. Mr. Foos was appointed to the Board as a member of the class of 2012 upon the closing of the acquisition of Transatlantic on March 6, 2012, in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, and is standing for election to the Board for the first time at the 2012 Annual Meeting.27, 2012.

Information about Voting

Proxies received from Alleghany stockholders of record will be voted for the election of the four nominees named above as Alleghany directors unless such stockholders indicate otherwise. If any of the foregoing nominees is unable to serve for any reason, which is not anticipated, the shares represented by proxy may be voted for such other person or persons as may be determined by the holders of such proxy unless stockholders indicate otherwise. A nominee for director shall be elected to the Board if such nominee receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the election of such nominee. A majority of votes cast means the number of votes cast “for” a nominee’s election must exceed the number of votes cast “against” the nominee’s election. Abstentions and broker non-votes (see “Information About Voting”)page 3) do not count as votes cast “for” or “against” the nominee’s election. Abstentions and broker non-voteselection, but will be counted as present at the meeting for quorum purposes.

Director Qualifications

The following information includes for each of the age,nominees named for election as director at the 2015 Annual Meeting, and each of the other directors of Alleghany:

age,

year in which first elected as a director of Alleghany, the

principal occupation and/or other business experience for the past five years,

other public company directorships during the past five years and the

experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each of the nominees named for election as director, and of each of the other directors of Alleghany. skills.

In addition to the information presented below regarding the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the Board to the conclusion that each of the nominees named for election as director should be elected as a director of Alleghany, Alleghany believes that each of the nominees, and each of the other directors of Alleghany, has a

reputation for integrity, honesty and for adherence to high ethical standards. Alleghany also believes that each of the nominees, named for election as director, and each of the other directors of Alleghany, has demonstrated business acumen and an ability to exercise sound judgment, as well as a commitment to service to Alleghany and to the Board.

-17-


Nominees for Election:Election

 

John G. Foos

Age 6265

Director since 2012

Term expires in 2012Member of the Audit

    Committee

Member of the

    Nominating and

    Governance Committee

  LOGO  

Mr. Foos was Chief Financial Officer of Independence Blue Cross, a health insurance company, from 1989 until his retirement in November 2008. In addition, Mr. Foos currently serves as a director of Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina, a South Carolina-owned and operated health insurance carrier, and the HAI Group Companies, a provider of niche insurance programs and services for the public and affordable housing community. Mr. Foos served as a director and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Plan Investment Fund. Mr. FoosFund during the past five years and was a director of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. prior to March 6, 2012.

 

Mr. Foos’ qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include his extensive experience in and knowledge of accounting and finance, which includes service as the Chief Financial Officer of Independence Blue Cross, in addition to his prior experience as a Partner with KPMG LLP and his financial literacy.

William K. Lavin

Age 6770

Director since 1992

Chairman of the Audit

    Committee

Member of the

    Compensation

    Committee

Term expires in 2012

LOGO

  LOGO

Mr. Lavin has been a financial consultant since October 1994, and currently serves as a director of Artisanal Brands, Inc., a specialty foods company.

 

Mr. Lavin’s qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include his business experience as an executive with public and private companies, his extensive experience with public and financial accounting matters for such companies and his financial literacy.

Phillip M. Martineau

Age 6467

Director since 2009

Member of the Compensation     Committee

Member of the

    Nominating and

    Governance Committee

Term expires in 2013

LOGO

  LOGO

Mr. Martineau has beenwas Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Pittsburgh Corning Europe, building materials companies, sincefrom June 2005.2005 until his retirement in May 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Martineau was Chief Executive Officer and a director of High Voltage Engineering Corporation, (“High Voltage”),or “High Voltage,” a designer and manufacturer of power control systems, from December 2004 until February 2005. The Board of Directors of High Voltage hired Mr. Martineau as Chief Executive Officer to lead High Voltage through a restructuring under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, which resulted in its sale to Siemens in February 2005.

 

Mr. Martineau’s qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include his years of executive operational experience with global companies in the materials and manufacturing sectors, particularly his experience as a Chief Executive Officer of such companies, as well as his experience as a director on the boards of directors of other companies.

-18-


Raymond L.M. Wong

Age 5962

Director since 2006

Member of the Audit Committee

Member of the
Compensation
Committee

Term expires in 2012

  LOGO  

Mr. Wong is currently a Managing Director of Spring Mountain Capital, LP, an investment management company which he joined in June 2007. Prior to that, from July 2002 until June 2007, Mr. Wong was the Managing Member of DeFee Lee Pond Capital LLC, a financial advisory and consulting servicesprivate investment company. In addition, Mr. Wong is a director of American Power Group Corporation, an energy technology company.

 

Mr. Wong’s qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include his business experience, particularly his 25 years as a managing director in the investment banking group of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., and his financial literacy.

Other Alleghany Directors:

Other Alleghany Directors

 

Stephen P. Bradley

Age 70

Director since 2012

Term expires in 2013

LOGO

Mr. Bradley is the William Ziegler Professor of Business Administration Emeritus at the Harvard Business School. In addition, Mr. Bradley currently serves as a director of CIENA Corp. and of CRICO/Risk Management Foundation. Mr. Bradley was a director of Transatlantic prior to March 6, 2012 and has also previously served as a director of i2 Technologies, Inc.

Mr. Bradley’s qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board include his academic experience at the Harvard Business School relating to his work as a professor of competitive and corporate strategy and his considerable experience as a consultant and as a director of public companies.

Karen Brenner

Age 56

Director since 2009

Member of the Audit     Committee

Member of the Nominating and Governance     Committee

Term expires in 2013

LOGO

Ms. Brenner has been a Clinical Professor of Business at the Leonard N. Stern School of Business at New York University since 2008. She teaches professional responsibility in law and business, corporate governance in law and business, and corporate turnarounds in the interdepartmental markets, ethics, and law program. Ms. Brenner also has been a principal at Brenner & Company, a financial management and advisory firm she founded, since 1998.

Ms. Brenner’s qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include her years of business experience as a Chief Executive Officer and/or board member of public and private companies in a wide variety of industries, and as an advisor to private equity firms, venture capital companies, boards of directors and chief executive officers focusing on enhancing value of operating companies, and her experience in corporate governance and management issues.

Thomas S. Johnson

Age 71

Director since 1997

and for 1992-1993

Member of the Compensation

    Committee

Member of the

    Nominating and

    Governance Committee

Term expires in 2013

LOGO

Mr. Johnson was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GreenPoint Financial Corporation and its subsidiary GreenPoint Bank from 1993 until his retirement on December 31, 2004. In addition, Mr. Johnson currently serves as a director of R.R. Donnelly & Sons Company and The Phoenix Companies, Inc. and served as a director of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation during the past five years.

Mr. Johnson’s qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include his over 30 years of experience as a financial services industry executive, particularly as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GreenPoint Financial Corporation, his experience as a director on the boards of directors of other companies, and his financial literacy.

James F. Will

Age 73

Director since 1992

Member of the

    Compensation Committee

Member of the

    Nominating and

    Governance Committee

Term expires in 2013

LOGO

Mr. Will was the President of Saint Vincent College from July 2000 until his retirement in June 2006, at which time he was named Vice Chancellor and President Emeritus of Saint Vincent College.

Mr. Will’s qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include his over 20 years of experience as an executive in the steel industry, particularly his tenure as President and Chief Executive Officer of Armco Inc., a steel manufacturing and metals processing company, and his experience as President of Saint Vincent College.

Rex D. Adams

Age 7275

Director since 1999

Chairman of the


Nominating and


Governance Committee

Member of the Audit


Committee

Term expires in 2014Retiring effective at the 2015 Annual Meeting

  LOGO  

Mr. Adams has been a director and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Invesco Ltd., an investment management company, since April 2006, and a director of Invesco Ltd. since 2001. In addition, Mr. Adams has been Dean Emeritus at the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University since December 2004.

 

Mr. Adams’ qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include his business experience, including over 30 years as an executive of Mobil Corporation, his experience as a director on the boards of directors of other companies, particularly companies in the investment management industry, his financial literacy, his experience as the Dean and as a professor at the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University, and his experience in matters of corporate governance.

Stephen P. Bradley

Age 73

Director since 2012

Member of the Audit Committee

Member of the
Nominating and
Governance Committee

Term expires in 2016

LOGO

Mr. Bradley is currently the William Ziegler Professor of Business Administration Emeritus at the Harvard Business School where he has been a professor since 1968. In addition, Mr. Bradley currently serves as a director of CRICO/Risk Management Foundation, a medical professional liability carrier. Mr. Bradley was a director of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. prior to March 6, 2012 and also previously served as a director of CIENA Corp. and i2 Technologies, Inc.

Mr. Bradley’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his academic experience at the Harvard Business School relating to his work as a professor of competitive and corporate strategy and his considerable experience as a consultant and as a director of public companies.

-19-


Karen Brenner

Age 59

Director since 2009

Member of the Audit
Committee

Member of the
Nominating and
Governance Committee

Term expires in 2016

LOGO

Ms. Brenner has been an Executive Director of Law and Business Initiatives at New York University since 2012 and Clinical Professor of Business at the Leonard N. Stern School of Business at New York University since 2008. She teaches professional responsibility in law and business, corporate governance in law and business and corporate transformation and leadership. Ms. Brenner also has been a principal at Brenner & Company, a financial management and advisory firm she founded, since 1998.

Ms. Brenner’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include her years of business experience as Chairman/Chief Executive Officer and/or board member of public and private companies in a wide variety of industries, and as an advisor to private equity firms, venture capital companies, boards of directors and chief executive officers focusing on enhancing value of operating companies, and her experience in corporate governance and management issues.

Ian H. Chippendale

Age 6366

Director since 2012

Chairman of the
Compensation Committee

Term expires in 20142017

  LOGO  

Mr. Chippendale is the formerretired Chairman (from September 2003 to December 2006) of RBS Insurance Group, Ltd., an insurance company. In addition, Mr. Chippendale currently serveshas served as a director of HomeServe plc, an insurance company, since January 2007 and was a director of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. prior to March 6, 2012.

 

Mr. Chippendale’s qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board includesalso include his insurance industry knowledge and his international experience, including his service as the Chairman of RBS Insurance Group, Ltd.

Weston M. Hicks

Age 5558

Director since 2004

Term expires in 20142017

  

LOGO

  

Mr. Hicks has been Alleghany’s President and chief executive officer since December 2004. In addition, Mr. Hicks is a director of AllianceBernstein Corporation.Corporation, an investment management and research company.

 

Mr. Hicks’ qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include his years of experience as an executive in the insurance and financial services industry, particularly his experience as Alleghany’s President and chief executive officer during the past seventen years, and his experience as an analyst of property and casualty insurance companies.

-20-


Thomas S. Johnson

Age 74

Director since 1997

    and for 1992-1993

Member of the Compensation

    Committee

Member of the

    Nominating and

    Governance Committee

Term expires in 2016

LOGO

Mr. Johnson was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GreenPoint Financial Corporation and its subsidiary GreenPoint Bank from 1993 until his retirement on December 31, 2004. Mr. Johnson currently serves as a director of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation and the Institute of International Education. Mr. Johnson served as a director of The Phoenix Companies, Inc., R.R. Donnelly & Sons Company and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation during the past five years.

Mr. Johnson’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his over 30 years of experience as a financial services industry executive, particularly as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GreenPoint Financial Corporation, his experience as a member of the boards of directors of other companies and his financial literacy.

Jefferson W. Kirby

Age 5053

Director since 2006

Term expires in 20142017

  

LOGO

  

Mr. Kirby has been Chairman of the Board of Alleghany since July 2010. Mr. Kirby has been the Managing Member of Broadfield Capital Management, LLC, an investment advisory services company, since July 2003. Mr. Kirby also currently serves aswas a director of Somerset Hills Bancorp.Bancorp from 2008 until May 2013.

 

Mr. Kirby’s qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include his over 2025 years of experience in financial services and investment management, including his service as a Vice President of Alleghany from 1994 to June 2003 and as an investment manager.

-21-


Compensation of Directors

The information under this heading relates to the compensation during 20112014 of those personsnon-employee directors who served as directors of Alleghanyon the Board at any time during 2011, except2014. Employee directors are not separately compensated for Mr. Hicks, whose compensation is reflected intheir service on the Summary Compensation Table on page 66.Board.

20112014 Director Compensation

 

Name

  Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash
   Stock
Awards
(1)
   Option
Awards
(2)
   All Other
Compensation(3)
   Total   Fees
Earned or Paid
in Cash
   Stock
Awards(1)
   Total 

Rex D. Adams

  $67,000    $82,365    $66,487         $215,852    $102,000    $129,899    $231,899  

Stephen P. Bradley

   89,500     129,899     219,399  

Karen Brenner

  $62,000    $82,365    $66,487         $210,852     97,000     129,899     226,899  

John J. Burns, Jr.

  $200,000              $31,099    $231,099  

Dan R. Carmichael

  $70,000    $82,365    $66,487         $218,852  

Ian H. Chippendale

   87,500     129,899     217,399  

John G. Foos

   93,500     129,899     223,399  

Thomas S. Johnson

  $57,000    $82,365    $66,487         $205,852     92,000     129,899     221,899  

Jefferson W. Kirby

  $140,000    $82,365    $66,487         $288,852     140,000     129,899     269,899  

William K. Lavin

  $80,000    $82,365    $66,487         $228,852     115,000     129,899     244,899  

Phillip M. Martineau

  $57,000    $82,365    $66,487         $205,852     92,000     129,899     221,899  

James F. Will

  $57,000    $82,365    $66,487         $205,852  

James F. Will(2)

   11,000          11,000  

Raymond L.M. Wong

  $65,000    $82,365    $66,487         $213,852     100,000     129,899     229,899  

 

(1)Represents the grant date fair value of the award of 250321 shares of restricted common stock or 250321 restricted stock units (each equivalent to one share of common stock) made to each non-employee director (other than Mr. Burns, who, commencing in 2011, waived his right to receive awards under the 2010 Directors’ Plan) under the 2010 Directors’ Plan on May 2, 2011,April 28, 2014, and computed in accordance with FASBthe Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC 718”). As of December 31, 2014, each director held either 321 shares of unvested restricted common stock or “ASC 718.”321 unvested restricted stock units.

 

(2)Represents the grant date fair value dollar amountMr. Will retired as a director in April 2014 and did not receive any awards of arestricted stock option for 500 shares of commonor restricted stock made to each non-employee director (other than Mr. Burns, who, commencing in 2011, waived his right to receive awards under the 2010 Directors’ Plan) under the 2010 Directors’ Plan on May 2, 2011, and computed in accordance with ASC 718. The amount of outstanding options held at December 31, 2011 by each director pursuant to outstanding stock options was as follows: 7,233 for each of Messrs. Adams, Carmichael, Lavin and Will; 6,038 for Mr. Johnson; 3,154 for each of Messrs. Kirby and Wong; 2,102 for Mr. Burns; and 1,010 for each of Ms. Brenner and Mr. Martineau.

(3)Reflects a payment of $18,409, representing the dollar value of the insurance premiums paid by Alleghany for the benefit of Mr. Burns for life insurance maintained on his behalf pursuant to Alleghany’s life insurance program in which retired Alleghany officers are eligible to participate, and a payment of $12,690, representing the reimbursement of taxes, and the reimbursement itself, on income imputed to Mr. Burns pursuant to such life insurance program.units during 2014.

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash

Each director whoFollowing is not an Alleghany officer or serving as Chairman or Vice Chairman ofinformation regarding fees earned and paid in cash to directors for service on the Board receives an annual retainer of $40,000, payable in cash The Chairman of the Board receives an annual retainer of $140,000. Arrangements with the Vice Chairman of the Board, including an annual retainer of $200,000, payable in cash, are described below. The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an annual fee of $30,000, and each other member receives an annual fee of $15,000. The Chairman of the Compensation Committee receives an annual fee of $15,000, and each other member receives an annual fee of $10,000. The Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee receives an annual fee of $12,000, and eachits Committees:

  Board

•  Each independent director other than the Chairman receives an annual retainer of $75,000.

•  The Chairman receives an annual retainer of $140,000.

  Audit Committee

•  The Chairman receives an annual fee of $30,000.

•  Each other member receives an annual fee of $15,000.

  Compensation Committee

•  The Chairman receives an annual fee of $15,000.

•  Each other member receives an annual fee of $10,000.

  Nominating and Governance   Committee

•  The Chairman receives an annual fee of $12,000.

•  Each other member receives an annual fee of $7,000.

Stock Awards and Option Awards

Pursuant to the 2010 Directors’ Plan, each year as of the first business day following the Annual Meetingan annual meeting of Stockholders,stockholders, each individual who was elected, re-elected or continues to serve as a member of the Board and who is not an employee of Alleghany or any of its subsidiaries receives:

a stock option to purchase 500 shares of common stock, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant; and

receives, at the individual director’s election, either (i) 250a number of shares of restricted common stock or (ii) 250 restricted stock units each(each equivalent to one share of common stock) equal to $130,000 divided by the average of the closing sales prices of the common stock whichon the

-22-


30 days preceding the grant date as reported by the NYSE. Such shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units, as the case may be, are subject to potential forfeiture until the first Annual Meetingannual meeting of Stockholdersstockholders following the date of grant and are subject to restrictions upon transfer until the third anniversary of the date of grant.

On May 2, 2011,April 28, 2014, each eligible director received a stock option to purchase 500either 321 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $329.46 per share and either (i) 250 shares of restricted

common stock or (ii) 250321 restricted stock units. Each director is permitted to defer payment of the restricted stock units, and all whole restricted stock units will be paid in the form of whole shares of common stock.

Arrangements with the Vice Chairman of the Board

Mr. Burns was Chairman of the Board through June 30, 2010. Subsequent to the election of Mr. Kirby as Chairman of the Board effective July 1, 2010, Mr. Burns remained on the Board as Vice Chairman and a director. For his service as Vice Chairman of the Board, Mr. Burns receives an annual retainer of $200,000 in cash. Commencing in 2011, Mr. Burns waived his rights to receive awards under the 2010 Directors’ Plan and any successor plans thereto. Mr. Burns previously received an annual retainer of $400,000 in cash for his service as Chairman of the Board. In 2004, Alleghany established an office in New Canaan, Connecticut which Mr. Burns uses as his principal office for purposes of attending to Alleghany-related matters. As Mr. Burns also uses this office to attend to personal matters, since July 1, 2010, Mr. Burns has reimbursed Alleghany for fifty percent of the annual rent and operating costs for this office, amounting to $32,900 for calendar year 2011. Mr. Burns has indicated to Alleghany his intention to assume the lease for this office and all associated costs on or prior to July 1, 2012. During the period that Mr. Burns served as Chairman of the Board, he reimbursed Alleghany for twenty-five percent of the annual rent and operating costs for this office.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS SET FORTH IN THIS PROPOSAL. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY VOTE. EACH NOMINEE SHALL BE ELECTED BY THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST WITH RESPECT TO THE ELECTION OF SUCH NOMINEE. A MAJORITY OF VOTES CAST MEANS THE NUMBER OF VOTES CAST “FOR” A NOMINEE’S ELECTION MUST EXCEED THE NUMBER OF VOTES CAST “AGAINST” THE NOMINEE’S ELECTION. ABSTENTIONS AND BROKER NON-VOTES (SEE “INFORMATION ABOUT VOTING”) DO NOT COUNT AS VOTES CAST “FOR” OR “AGAINST”WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE NOMINEE’S ELECTION.RESULTS OF THIS VOTE.

-23-


ProposalPROPOSAL 2. Approval of 2012 Long-Term Incentive PlanAPPROVAL OF THE 2015 DIRECTORS’ STOCK PLAN

Alleghany’s 2007 LTIP,The 2010 Directors’ Plan, which provides for awardsthe annual grant to each non-employee director of long-term incentive compensationAlleghany of either a number of shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units (each equivalent to its key employees, will terminateone share of common stock) equal to $130,000 divided by its termsthe average of the closing sales prices of the common stock on the 30 days preceding the grant date ofas reported by the 2012 Annual Meeting.NYSE, will expire on April 23, 2015. The Board believes it to be in the best interests of Alleghany and its stockholders to adopt a new plan at this timereplace the 2010 Directors’ Plan with the 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan, or the “2015 Directors’ Plan,” which is substantially similar to the 2010 Directors’ Plan, in order to be able to continue to provide long-term incentives to employees who are responsible for Alleghany’s continued successattract and growth without a gap after the expiration of the 2007 LTIP. Adoption of a new plan at this time will also assure that there will be an adequate supply of shares to fashion appropriate incentives for any new senior level executives. To provide a continuation of those incentivesretain independent directors and to assist Alleghenyencourage them to increase and maintain their stock ownership in attracting and retaining executives of experience and ability on a basis competitiveAlleghany consistent with industry practices,the common stock ownership guidelines in order to promote long-term stockholder value. Accordingly, the Board has adopted the 2012 Long-Term Incentive2015 Directors’ Plan, or the “2012 LTIP,” effective upon stockholder approval. The 2012 LTIP permits Alleghany to provide equity-based incentive compensation, payable in stock or cash,

Description of the types commonly known2015 Directors’ Plan

Pursuant to the 2015 Directors’ Plan, each year as of the first business day following an annual meeting of stockholders, each individual who was elected, re-elected or continues to serve as a member of the Board and who is not an employee of Alleghany or any of its subsidiaries will receive, at the individual director’s election, either a number of shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units (each equivalent to one share of common stock) equal to $130,000 (or such higher amount determined by the Board from time to time) divided by the average of the closing sales prices of the common stock appreciation rights, performanceon the 30 consecutive trading days preceding the grant date as reported by the NYSE. Such shares performanceof restricted common stock or restricted stock units, phantom stock and stock options,or the “Restricted Shares,” as well as other types of equity-based incentive compensation. No awardsthe case may be, granted underare subject to potential forfeiture until the 2012 LTIP afterfirst annual meeting of stockholders following the Annual Meetingdate of Stockholders in 2017.grant and are subject to restrictions upon transfer until the third anniversary of the date of grant. Non-employee individuals who are appointed to the Board between annual meetings of stockholders, or “Newly Appointed Directors,” will receive a pro-rated Restricted Share grant.

The following is a summary of2015 Directors’ Plan will be administered by the 2012 LTIP and it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the plan, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A.

Description of the 2012 LTIP

General.Board. The Compensation Committee administers the 2012 LTIP. Each member of the Compensation Committee shall be both an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3(b)(3)(i) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or successor rule or regulation (the “Exchange Act”). The Compensation CommitteeBoard has the authority, to determine, within the limits of the 2012 LTIP,2015 Directors’ Plan, to construe the individuals2015 Directors’ Plan, to whom awards will be granted,determine all questions arising thereunder and to adopt and amend the typerules and size of such awards, including any objectives or conditionsregulations for earning payment pursuant to such awards.

Participation. The Compensation Committee may select participants in the 2012 LTIP from among employees of Alleghany and its subsidiaries. The term “employee,” as used in the 2012 LTIP, means any person, including any officer, employed by Alleghany or a subsidiary on a salaried basis. The term “subsidiary,” as used in the 2012 LTIP, means any corporation,

partnership or limited liability company, a majorityadministration of the total combined voting power of whose stock or other equity interest2015 Directors’ Plan as it may deem desirable. It is beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by Alleghany. Alleghany and its subsidiaries currently have approximately 1,394 employees.

Awards. Awards available under the 2012 LTIP may be paid in cash and/or shares of Alleghany common stock, and include, but need not be limited to, grants of:

restricted stock;

restricted stock units;

stock appreciation rights;

performance shares;

performance units;

phantom stock; and

stock options to purchase shares of Alleghany common stock, including both stock options intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422A of the Code and stock options not intended so to qualify.

The Compensation Committee also may make awards in any other form deemed by it to be consistent with the purposes of the 2012 LTIP.

Performance-based Compensation/Performance Goals. The Compensation Committee may, but is not required to, grant an award to any participant who is or who becomes a “Covered Employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Codeexpected that is intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code (a “Qualifying Award”). Covered Employees include primarily those officers of the companies who qualify as Named Executive Officers for purposes of the Company’s proxy disclosure and reporting. Compensation in excess of $1 million to a Covered Employee may not be deductible by the Company if such compensation is not “performance based compensation.” In order for the value of awards other than certain stock options and stock appreciation rights under the 2012 LTIP to be performance based compensation, such awards must be conditional upon the achievement of performance goals established by the Compensation Committee in writing not later than the time period required by Section 162(m) of the Code. Such performance goals, which may vary from participant to participantwill periodically review grant amounts and award to award, may be expressed in terms

ofrecommend any but not limitedchanges, as appropriate, to the following business criteria:Board. Following the attainment2015 Annual Meeting, Alleghany is expected to have nine non-employee directors who would be entitled to participate in the 2015 Directors’ Plan.

Shares of specific amounts of, or increases in, one or more ofrestricted common stock granted to a non-employee director pursuant to the following:

revenues;

operating income;

cash flow;

management of expenses;

loss reserves and loss adjustment expense reserves;

underwriting expenses;

underwriting profits;

income before income taxes;

net income;

earnings per share;

net worth;

stockholders’ equity;

investment performance;

return on equity or assets; or

total return to stockholders;

in each case, whether applicable2015 Directors’ Plan shall be issued for no consideration, but shall be forfeited to Alleghany or any relevant subsidiary or business unit or entity in which Alleghany has a significant investment, or any combination thereof as the Compensation Committee may deem appropriate. Prior to(without the payment of any Qualifying Award (other than stock options or stock appreciation rights granted at Fair Market Value),consideration) if such non-employee director resigns from the Compensation Committee must certify in writing that the performance goals were satisfied.

Shares of Stock SubjectBoard prior to the Plan. The 2012 LTIP providesfirst annual meeting of stockholders following the date of grant. In addition, shares of restricted common stock may not be sold, assigned, pledged or transferred to any person until the third anniversary of the date of grant (with certain minor exceptions for Newly Appointed Directors), provided that such transfer restrictions shall no longer apply upon (i) a maximumnon-employee director’s death prior to the first annual meeting of 600,000stockholders following the date of grant, (ii) a non-employee director’s ceasing to be a director for any reason after the first annual meeting of stockholders following the date of grant or (iii) a Change in Control (as defined in the 2015 Directors’ Plan).

In lieu of the issuance of shares of restricted common stock, a director may elect to receive restricted stock units, which are unfunded, bookkeeping units having a value equal to the value of shares of restricted common stock. In addition, restricted stock units are subject to the same terms and restrictions applicable to, shares of restricted common stock. At the time of payment, the then-current value of common stock multiplied by the number of whole restricted stock units (as adjusted for any dividends paid on the common stock) will be payable in the form of shares of common stock, toand any fractional restricted stock unit shall be paid in cash. Non-employee directors are permitted to participantsdefer payment of restricted stock units to any time after the third anniversary of the date of grant until such non-employee director retires from the Board (with certain minor exceptions for Newly Appointed Directors).

-24-


A maximum of 60,000 shares of common stock may be issued to non-employee directors under the 2012 LTIP and/or purchased pursuant to stock options granted under the 2012 LTIP,2015 Directors’ Plan, subject to anti-dilution and other adjustments in certain events specified in the 2012 LTIP. In this regard, awards based upon, or measured by, the value or changes in the value of shares of common stock (whether paid in cash or shares of common stock), any shares of common stock retained by Alleghany in satisfaction of a participant’s obligation for withholding taxes, and shares of common stock not issued as a result of a net exercise of a stock option will be treated as shares of common stock paid to participants. If any award is forfeited or otherwise terminates, in whole or part, or if a stock option expires or terminates without being exercised, the shares of common stock with respect to such awards or stock options will remain available under the 2012 LTIP. Shares of common stock that Alleghany issues through the assumption or substitution of outstanding grants in connection with the acquisition of another entity will not reduce the maximum number of shares available under the 2012 LTIP. The shares of common stock available under the 2012 LTIP may be either authorized but unissued shares or shares held by Alleghany as treasury shares, The Compensation Committee may grant a maximum of 50,000 shares of common stock as Qualifying Awards to any participant in any calendar year, subject to anti-dilution and other adjustments in certain events specified in the 2012 LTIP. The maximum number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2012 LTIP in respect of awards granted as stock options is 100,000, and the maximum number of shares with respect to which Qualifying Awards may be granted to any participant in any calendar year in the form of stock options (all of which may be granted in the form of incentive stock options) or stock appreciation rights is 10,000, subject, in each case, to anti-dilution and other adjustments in certain events specified in the 2012 LTIP. There is no limit specified in the 2012 LTIP on the amount of cash which may be paid pursuant to awards granted under the 2012 LTIP.

Stock Options. The 2012 LTIP provides that no stock option granted under the 2012 LTIP shall be exercisable more than ten years after its grant and the price at which2015 Directors’ Plan. Such shares of common stock may be purchased under any such stock option shall not be less than 100 percent of its Fair Market Value, as defined below, on the date of grant. Upon exercise of a stock option, the option price is required to be paid in cash, or, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, inoriginal issue shares of common stock, valued at the Fair Market Value, as defined below, thereof on the date of payment, or in a combination of cash andtreasury stock, shares of common stock. The 2012 LTIP authorizes the Compensation Committee,stock purchased in the event of any tender offeropen market or exchange offer other than by Alleghany for shares of Alleghany common stock, to take such action as it may deem appropriate to enable recipients of outstanding awards to avail themselves ofotherwise. On March 2, 2015, the benefits of such offer, including acceleration of payment or exercise dates and purchase of outstanding stock options.

Fair Market Value. “Fair Market Value” isfair market value (as defined in the 2012 LTIP generally as (i) the closing sales prices2015 Directors’ Plan) of theshares of common stock on the relevant date as reported on the stock exchange or market on which the common stock is primarily traded, or (ii) if no sale is made on such date, then fair market value is the weighted average of the closing sales prices of the common stock on the next preceding day and the next succeeding day on which such sales were made as reported on the stock exchange or market on which the common stock is primarily traded. Thewas $473.02 per share, Fair Market Value of Alleghany’s common stock on March 12, 2012 was $331.80 andor $28,381,200 in the aggregate market value on such date offor the 600,00060,000 shares of common stock subject to the 2012 LTIP was $199,080,000.2015 Directors’ Plan.

Transferability. Under the 2012 LTIP, unless otherwise authorized by the Compensation Committee, any cash payment on account of awards under the 2012 LTIP to a deceased participant shall be paid to such beneficiary as has been designated by the participant in writing to the Secretary of Alleghany, or in the absence of such designation and in the case of awards payable in shares of common stock, according to the Participant’s will or the laws of descent and distribution. However, the Compensation Committee may provide that awards granted pursuant to the 2012 LTIP, other than an option granted as an incentive stock option, be transferable without consideration to a participant’s immediate family members (i.e., children, grandchildren or spouse), to trusts for the benefit of such immediate family members, and to partnerships in which such family members are the only partners.

Time and Deferral of Payments. At the time the Committee grants each award under the 2012 LTIP, the Committee will specify in writing the time of the payment of the award. In making any such award, the Committee may permit the participant to elect to receive all or a portion of an award at a later date. Any such deferrals shall be for such periods and upon such other terms as the Committee may determine to be appropriate and shall be reflected in a written agreement in compliance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

Amendment or Termination of the Plan. The Board, without the consent of any participant, may terminate or amend or terminate the 2012 LTIP2015 Directors’ Plan at any time, including, without limitation, to increase or decrease the number of shares of common stock granted as Restricted Shares; provided, however,, that no such action shall adversely affect any rights or obligations with respect to any awards previouslytheretofore made under the 2012 LTIP,2015 Directors’ Plan, andprovided further,, that no such amendment, without the approval of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock voted thereon in person or by proxy, shall:

shall increase the number of shares of common stock subject to the 2012 LTIP (except pursuant to anti-dilution and other adjustments in certain events specified in the 2012 LTIP);

2015 Directors’ Plan, extend the period during which awards may be granted;

increase the maximum term for which stock options may be issued under the 2012 LTIP;

decrease the minimum price at which (a) stock options may be issued under the 2012 LTIPgranted or (b) outstanding stock options may be exercised;

permit the surrender of any outstanding option as consideration for the grant of a new option with a lower exercise price; or

materially modify the requirements for eligibility to participate in the 2012 LTIP.2015 Directors’ Plan.

The 2015 Directors’ Plan will be effective upon stockholder approval thereof at the 2015 Annual Meeting. If the 2015 Directors’ Plan is approved, awards will be made, commencing in April 2015 and annually thereafter, on the first business day following an annual meeting of stockholders in accordance with the 2015 Directors’ Plan (and on the first business day following the appointment of a Newly Appointed Director). The 2015 Directors’ Plan will terminate immediately preceding the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, unless sooner terminated by the Board in accordance with the terms of the 2015 Directors’ Plan. No awards may be granted under the 2015 Directors’ Plan after such termination, but such termination shall not affect the validity of any award granted prior to any such termination.

A copy of the 2015 Directors’ Plan is set forth inExhibit A to this proxy statement. The foregoing description is a summary of some, but not all, of the essential provisions of the 2015 Directors’ Plan, and is qualified by reference to the full text of the 2015 Directors’ Plan.

Federal Income Tax Consequences

The grant and payment of awards under the 2012 LTIP may have varying tax consequences to Alleghany and each participant, depending upon the nature of the award and certain other considerations. The following description is a summary of the federal income tax treatment of awards under the 2012 LTIP payable in shares of common stock;2015 Directors’ Plan; because the applicable tax rules are quite technical, the description is general in nature and does not purport to be complete.

Non-Qualified Stock Options. A participant who is grantedUnless a non-qualifiedrecipient of shares of restricted common stock option undermakes the 2012 LTIPelection described below, the recipient will not recognize any taxable income at the time the option is granted. Upon exercise of the non-qualified option, the participant will recognize ordinary income, and Alleghany will be entitled to a deduction, in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value on the date of exercise ofthat the shares of common stock acquired upon exercise of the option over the exercise price paid. The participant’s basis for purposes of determining gain or loss on a subsequent disposition of the shares of common stock acquired upon exercise of the option will be the fair market value of those shares on the date the participant exercised the option, and any such subsequent gain or loss will be taxable as a capital gain or loss, short-term or long-term depending upon the participant’s holding period for the shares of common stock. A participant is permitted to pay the exercise price with existing shares. The existing shares will be treated as if exchanged for new shares in the same number in a non-taxable transaction and balance of the shares will be subject to the tax rule outlined above.

Incentive Stock Options.If a participant is granted an option under the 2012 LTIP that constitutes an incentive stock option, the participant will not recognize any taxable income either

at the time the option is granted or upon exercise of the option, provided the participant was an employee of Alleghany or a subsidiary of Alleghany from the date the option was granted until the date of exercise (or exercises the option within three months following a termination of his or her employment). Alleghany will not be entitled to any deduction. However, the excess of the fair market value of the shares of common stock acquired upon exercise of the incentive stock option on the date of exercise over the exercise price paid will be an “item of tax preference” that may subject the participant to alternative minimum tax liability. If the participant does not dispose of the shares of common stock acquired upon exercise of the incentive stock option for at least two years after the incentive stock option was granted and at least one year after the shares were acquired, all gain realized upon the disposition of the shares will be treated as long-term capital gain, and any loss will be treated as long-term capital loss. If these holding periods are met, Alleghany will not be allowed any deduction with respect to the value of the incentive stock option. If the participant disposes of the shares of common stock acquired upon exercise of the incentive stock option within the one-year and two-year periods specified above, the participant will recognize ordinary income, and Alleghany will be entitled to a deduction, in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the excess of the fair market value on the date of exercise of the shares of common stock acquired over the exercise price paid, or (ii) the gain recognized, provided the shares ofrestricted common stock were disposed of by sale or exchange. Any amount recognized in excess ofreceived. Instead, the fair market value (on the date of exercise) of the shares of common stock will be taxable as long-term or short-term capital gain, depending upon the participant’s holding period for the shares of common stock.

Other Awards of Common Stock. A participant who is granted any other award entitling the participant to receive shares of common stock will generally not recognize any income upon the grant of the award. However, upon the delivery of any shares of common stock, the participantrecipient generally will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of anythe restricted common stock received,on the date that the forfeiture restriction with respect to such shares lapses, and Alleghany will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount recognized by the participant as ordinary income.

If the shares of common stock received by a participant are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, then, unless the participant makes the election described below, the participant will not recognize any income on the date that the shares of common stock were received. Instead, the participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date that the restrictions constituting a substantial risk of forfeiture with respect to such shares lapse (or are deemed to lapse), and Alleghany will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount recognized by the participantrecipient as ordinary income. The participant’srecipient’s basis for purposes of determining gain or loss on a subsequent disposition of the shares of common stock will be the fair market value of the common stock on the date that the

restrictions constituting a substantial risk of forfeiture restriction with respect to such shares lapsed, (or were deemed to lapse), and any subsequent gain or loss will generally be taxable as a capital gain or loss, short-term or long-term depending upon the participant’srecipient’s holding period for the shares of common stock.

A participant receivingIf on or before December 31, a director elects to receive restricted stock units for the following year’s annual equity grant, such director will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of common stock (restricted stock units pay out in the form of shares of common stock) at the time the restricted stock units are paid. Under the 2015 Directors’ Plan, a director is permitted to elect to defer payment of restricted stock units to any time after the third anniversary of the date of grant or until the date that such director retires from the Board (with certain minor exceptions for Newly Appointed Directors). If a director does not specify a payment date when he or she elects to receive restricted stock units, the payment date will be the third

-25-


anniversary of the date of grant (with certain minor exceptions for Newly Appointed Directors). Restricted stock units are subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the “Code,” which provides certain restrictions on the payment of deferred compensation and imposes penalties (e.g., a substantial risk20% penalty tax and interest penalty) on the recipient of forfeiturethe deferred compensation for failing to comply with such requirements.

A recipient may elect within thirty30 days after receipt of the shares of restricted common stock to recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of such shares (less the amount, if any, paid therefor) as of the date of receipt.receipt (and Alleghany will receive a corresponding deduction). In that case, the participant’srecipient will not recognize any income upon the vesting of such restricted common stock, the recipient’s basis in the shares of restricted common stock will be the fair market value of the shares of restricted common stock on the date that the shares were received, and any subsequent gain or loss will generally be taxable as a capital gain or loss, short-term or long-term depending upon the participant’srecipient’s holding period for the shares.shares of common stock. However, if the restricted shares of restricted common stock are subsequently forfeited, the participantrecipient will not be entitled to any tax deduction. Under the federal income tax laws, shares that are subject to restrictions on resale under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act are deemed subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture for a prescribed period, notwithstanding any longer period during which resale of such shares may actually be restricted.

Section 162(m) of the Code disallows a deduction to Alleghany for compensation paid to Alleghany’s Covered Employees in excess of $1 million for any taxable year of Alleghany, subject to certain exceptions. Among other exceptions, the deduction limit does not apply to compensation that meets the requirements for “performance-based compensation” and in respect of certain stock options and stock appreciation rights awards granted that constitute Qualifying Awards under the 2012 LTIP are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation.”

New Plan Benefits

AsThe following table sets forth the number of the date hereof, no benefits or amounts have been granted, awarded or received under the 2012 LTIP. Any future awards under the 2012 LTIP will be made in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Thus, it is not possible to determine the benefitsRestricted Shares that will be received by eligible participants ifgranted to our non-employee directors under the 2012 LTIP2015 Directors’ Plan on the first business day following the 2015 Annual Meeting, assuming that the 2015 Directors’ Plan is approved by our stockholders. Information concerning awards granted duringstockholders at such meeting, that each of the last fiscal year underfour current non-employee nominees for election as directors (Messrs. Foos, Lavin, Martineau and Wong) are approved by our stockholders at such meeting and that each of our five continuing non-employee directors (Messrs. Bradley, Chippendale, Johnson and Kirby and Ms. Brenner) continue to serve as non-employee directors through the 2007 LTIP is set forth in the table captioned “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2011” on page 68, and information regarding outstanding restricted stock and performance shares granted under the 2007 LTIP and under the 2002 LTIP is set forth in the table captioned “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2011 Fiscal Year-End” on page 73.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Thefirst business day following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2011, relating to Alleghany’s equity compensation plans under which its equity securities are authorized for issuance:such meeting:

 

Plan Category

 (a)
Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
  (b)
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
  (c)
Number of
Securities Remaining
Available for Future
Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected
in Column (a))
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)

  151,972(2)  $251.54(3)   267,760(4) 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

            
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  151,972        267,760  

Name and Position

  Number of
Restricted
Shares/Units
  Dollar Value 

Non-Employee Director Group(1)

   (2)  $1,170,000(3) 

 

(1)These equity compensation plans consistConsists of (i)nine persons, including the 2000 Directors’ Plan, (ii)four current non-employee nominees for election as directors (Messrs. Foos, Lavin, Martineau and Wong) and the 2005 Directors’ Plan, (iii) the 2010 Directors’ Plan, (iv) the 2002 LTIPfive continuing non-employee directors (Messrs. Bradley, Chippendale, Johnson and (v) the 2007 LTIP. Prior to its expiration on December 31, 2004, the 2000 Directors’ Plan provided for the annual grantKirby and Ms. Brenner).

(2)The number of an option to purchase 1,000 shares of common stock (subject to anti-dilution adjustments) to each director who was not an employee of Alleghany or any of its subsidiaries. Prior to its expiration on December 31, 2009, the 2005 Directors’ Plan provided for the annual grant to each director who was not an employee of Alleghany or any of its subsidiaries of a stock option to purchase 500 shares of common stock (subject to anti-dilution adjustments) and, at the individual director’s election, either 250 shares of restricted common stock or 250 restricted stock units each such unit equivalent to one share of common stock.

(2)

This amount includes (i) 16,382 outstanding director stock options issued underwill be the 2000 Directors’ Plan, (ii) 22,123 outstanding director stock options issued underquotient determined by dividing $130,000 by the 2005 Directors’ Plan, (iii) 9,600 outstanding director stock options issued under the 2010 Directors’ Plan, (iv) 3,168 outstanding restricted stock units issued to directors under the 2005 Directors’ Plan, (v) 2,525 outstanding restricted stock units issued to directors under the 2010 Directors’ Plan, (vi) 23,433 outstanding restricted stock units awarded to Mr. Hicks under the 2002 LTIP as a matching grant (the “Matching Grant Restricted Stock Units”), and (vii) 74,741 outstanding performance shares issued under the 2007 LTIP, assuming payouts at maximum. Restricted stock units granted to directors pursuant to the

2005 Directors’ Plan and 2010 Directors’ Plan (the “Director Restricted Stock Units”) are paid out in the form of common stock, with one share of common stock being paid for each Director Restricted Stock Unit. Matching Grant Restricted Stock Units are to be paid in cash and/or common stock, at the discretionaverage of the Compensation Committee, with one shareclosing sales prices of common stock or, if payment is made in cash, the market value of one share of common stock on the payment30 consecutive trading days preceding the grant date being paid for each Matching Grant Restricted Stock Unit. Performance shares outstanding underas reported by the 2007 LTIP are paid, at the end of a four-year award period, in a maximum amount equal to one and one-half shares of common stock for each performance share, depending upon the level of performance achieved. Payments in respect of performance shares are made based upon the market value of common stock on the payment date. Recipients of performance shares are permitted to elect to receive payment for performance shares in the form of cash and/or common stock, subject to certain limitations. Since there is no exercise price for restricted stock units or for performance shares, they are not taken into account in calculating the weighted-average exercise price in column (b).NYSE.

 

(3)The weighted-average exercise price is based uponEach non-employee director will receive a grant of shares of restricted common stock or, at his or her election, restricted stock units, having a value of $130,000 on the weighted-average exercise price offirst business day following the outstanding director stock options issued under the 2000 Directors’ Plan, under the 2005 Directors’ Plan and under the 2010 Directors’ Plan.2015 Annual Meeting.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE 2015 DIRECTORS’ PLAN. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY VOTE. THIS PROPOSAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST ON THIS PROPOSAL. ABSTENTIONS WILL HAVE THE EFFECT OF VOTES AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL. BROKER NON-VOTES WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE RESULTS OF THIS VOTE.

(4)This amount does not include (i) 577,026 shares of common stock that remained available for issuance under the 2002 LTIP upon its termination on December 31, 2006 or (ii) 27,485 shares of common stock that remained available for issuance under the 2005 Directors’ Plan upon its expiration on December 31, 2009 since no further awards of common stock may be made under either such plan. As of December 31, 2010, no shares of common stock remained available for future option grants under the 2000 Directors’ Plan.

Stockholder Approval

-26-


PROPOSAL 3. APPROVAL OF THE 2015 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

The Board believes it to be in the best interests of Alleghany and its stockholders to adopt at this time a new management incentive plan, replacing the 2010 MIP, in order to continue to reward, attract and retain highly qualified officers upon whom, in large measure, the sustained progress, growth and profitability of Alleghany depends. Accordingly, the Board adopted the 2015 Management Incentive Plan, or the “2015 Management Plan,” subject to stockholder approval. The 2015 Management Plan will permit (i) incentive compensation bonus awards to be structured to qualify as “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m) of the 2012 LTIPCode, or the “Qualifying Incentives,” and (ii) incentive compensation bonus awards not intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code, or the “Non-Qualifying Incentives.” In the event the 2015 Management Plan is not approved by stockholders of Alleghany, the Compensation Committee will consider the establishment of another annual or other incentive compensation plan.

An affirmative voteDescription of the 2015 Management Plan

The 2015 Management Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has the authority to select the officers (including officers who are directors) to participate in the 2015 Management Plan (after consideration of management’s recommendations), to establish the performance goals, to determine the amounts of incentive compensation bonus payable to any participant, and to determine whether such incentive compensation is intended to be a Qualifying Incentive or a Non-Qualifying Incentive.

Qualifying Incentives. Qualifying Incentives shall be payable to a participant as a result of the satisfaction of performance goals in respect of the calendar year or such other period, not to be less than six months, as is selected by the Compensation Committee, each a “Performance Period.” Prior to each Performance Period or at such later time as permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Compensation Committee will establish a target or range of incentive compensation bonus opportunity for each participant based upon the attainment of one or more performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may provide that a Qualifying Incentive shall be determined as an amount or percentage of a majorityspecified incentive pool based upon operating income, cash flow, earnings before income taxes, net income or other measures constituting a performance goal with such adjustments or exclusions as the Compensation Committee may determine; provided, however, that if payment of a Qualifying Incentive is based upon the attainment of one or more performance goals established by the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee may determine the amount of the incentive pool by reference to any measure, whether or not constituting a performance goal, as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate.

Performance goals may be based upon revenues; operating income; net operating income; cash flow; earnings before income taxes; net income; earnings per share; stockholders’ equity; return or net return on assets, net assets, investments, capital or equity; share price; share price appreciation; underwriting profits; gross or net premiums written; net premiums earned; compound growth in net loss and loss adjustment expense reserves; loss ratio or combined ratio of Alleghany’s insurance businesses, operating efficiency or strategic business objectives consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified cost targets; business expansion goals; goals relating to acquisitions or divestitures; and productivity improvements, all whether applicable to Alleghany or any subsidiary or business unit or entity in which Alleghany has a significant investment, or any combination thereof as the Compensation Committee may deem appropriate. A performance goal may be expressed on an absolute and/or relative basis, may be based on, or otherwise employ, comparisons based on internal targets, the past performance of Alleghany or any subsidiary (or any business unit thereof) and/or the past or current performance of other companies or indexes, may provide for the inclusion, exclusion or averaging of specified items in whole or in part, including without limitation, catastrophe losses, realized gains or losses on strategic investments, acquisitions and divestitures, currency fluctuations, discontinued operations, extraordinary items whether of income or expense, accounting and tax changes, and any unusual or nonrecurring items, and, in the case of earnings-based measures, may use or employ comparisons relating to capital, shareholders’ equity and/or shares outstanding, assets or net assets. The Compensation Committee may provide a threshold level of performance below which no incentive compensation bonus will be paid as well as a maximum level of performance above which no additional incentive compensation bonus will be paid. It also may provide for the payment of differing amounts for different levels of performance.

-27-


As soon as practicable at the end of each Performance Period but before any incentive compensation bonuses are paid to the participants under the 2015 Management Plan, the Compensation Committee will certify in writing whether the performance goal(s) were attained and the amount of the incentive compensation bonus payable to each participant based on the attainment of such specified performance goals. The Compensation Committee may determine to grant a participant an incentive compensation bonus equal to, but not in excess of, the amount specified in such written certification. The Compensation Committee also may reduce or eliminate the amount of any incentive compensation bonus of any participant at any time prior to payment thereof, based on such criteria as the Compensation Committee shall determine, including but not limited to individual merit and attainment of, or the failure to attain, specified personal goals established by the Compensation Committee. Under no circumstances, however, may the Compensation Committee increase the amount of the incentive compensation bonus otherwise payable to a participant beyond the amount originally established, waive the attainment of the performance goals established by the Compensation Committee or otherwise exercise its discretion so as to cause any incentive compensation bonus not to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code. The timing of payments to the participants under the 2015 Management Plan is designed to exempt the 2015 Management Plan from Section 409A of the Code.

Non-Qualifying Incentives. A Non-Qualifying Incentive may be awarded by the Compensation Committee to any participant (including covered employees) at any time before, during or following the completion of any Performance Period and may, but need not, be conditioned upon the achievement of any performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may increase, decrease or eliminate the amount of any Non-Qualifying Incentive awarded to any participant at any time prior to payment thereof, based on such criteria as it shall determine, including but not limited to individual merit and attainment of, or the failure to attain or achieve, any performance goals or specified personal goals established by the Compensation Committee or management, and the Compensation Committee may waive the attainment of or modify the terms of any performance or personal goals established by the Compensation Committee or management or otherwise exercise its discretion in any manner with respect to any Non-Qualifying Incentive. Non-Qualifying Incentives may be payable to a participant as a result of the satisfaction of performance goals in respect of a Performance Period or as a result of the achievement of an individual objective or result, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion. The grant or payment of a Non-Qualifying Incentive may not be made contingent on the failure of a participant to earn any Qualifying Incentive.

Anti-Dilution and Adjustments. To the extent that a performance goal is based on common stock present(such as increases in personearnings per share or represented by proxyother similar measures), a performance goal may be subject to anti-dilution and entitledother adjustments in certain events specified in the 2015 Management Incentive Plan.

Other Terms. The 2015 Management Plan does not limit the authority of Alleghany to voteestablish any other annual or other incentive compensation plan or to pay cash bonuses or other additional incentive compensation to employees of Alleghany, including to participants in the 2015 Management Plan. The maximum Qualifying Incentives, individually or in the aggregate, that could be payable to any participant in a single calendar year will not exceed $5.0 million. Incentive compensation bonuses paid pursuant to the 2015 Management Plan will be paid in cash. The Board, without the consent of any participant, may amend or terminate the 2015 Management Plan at any time. However, no amendment with respect to, or affecting, Qualifying Incentives that would require the 2012 Annual Meeting is requiredapproval of the stockholders pursuant to approveSection 162(m) of the 2012 LTIP.Code shall be effective without such approval.

A copy of the 2012 LTIP2015 Management Plan is set forth in full in Exhibit AB to this proxy statement. The foregoing description is a summary of some, but not all, of the essential provisions of the 2012 LTIP,2015 Management Plan, and is qualified by reference to the full text of the 2012 LTIP.2015 Management Plan which is incorporated by reference herein.

New Plan Benefits

Any awards under the 2015 Management Plan will be at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Therefore, it is not possible at present to determine the amount or form of any award that will be granted to any individual during the term of the 2015 Management Plan or that would have been granted during 2014 had the

-28-


2015 Management Plan been in effect. For information regarding awards made in 2014 to our Named Executive Officers (as defined on page 12) pursuant to the 2010 MIP, which the 2015 Management Plan is intended to replace, see the Summary Compensation Table on page 52. For all current executive officers as a group, consisting only of the Named Executive Officers, the maximum aggregate amount of awards made under the 2010 MIP for 2014 was $5.5 million. For all employees, including all current officers who are not executive officers, as a group, the maximum aggregate amount of awards made under the 2010 MIP for 2014 was $6.8 million. Directors of Alleghany who are not officers of Alleghany are not eligible to receive awards under the 2010 MIP or under the 2015 Management Plan.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE 2012 LTIP.2015 MANAGEMENT PLAN. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY VOTE. THIS PROPOSAL SHALL BE ADOPTEDAPPROVED BY THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE SHARES OF OUTSTANDING COMMON STOCK PRESENT IN PERSON OR REPRESENTED BY PROXY AT THE 2012 ANNUAL MEETING AND ENTITLED TO VOTE.VOTES CAST ON THIS PROPOSAL. ABSTENTIONS WILL HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS A VOTEOF VOTES AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL. BROKER NON-VOTES (SEE “INFORMATION ABOUT VOTING”) WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED AS SHARES ENTITLED TO VOTE WITH RESPECT TOHAVE NO EFFECT ON THE APPROVALRESULTS OF THE 2012 LTIP AND WILL NOT BE COUNTED AS VOTES CAST “FOR” OR “AGAINST”.THIS VOTE.

-29-


Proposal 3. Ratification of Selection ofPROPOSAL 4. RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the year 2012INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL 2015

On February 13, 2012, following a competitive process undertaken by theThe Audit Committee the Audit Committee approved the selection ofhas selected Ernst & Young LLP, (“E&Y”) to serveor “E&Y,” as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012. Alleghany is submitting a proposal to stockholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting for ratification of this selection.2015. Although ratification by stockholders is not a prerequisite to the ability of the Audit Committee to select E&Y as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee and the Board believe that such ratification is desirable. If stockholders do not ratify the selection of E&Y, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection of an independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee may, however, select E&Y notwithstanding the failure of stockholders to ratify its selection.

Prior to the engagement of E&Y, KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) had been Old Alleghany’s independent auditors from 1947 until its liquidation in 1986 and had been Alleghany’s independent auditors since its incorporation in November 1984. KPMG was notified on February 13, 2012 that it would not be retained as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012. KPMG’s engagement as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit Alleghany’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011, was unaffected by the selection of E&Y, as KPMG’s dismissal became effective on February 24, 2012, following the completion of KPMG’s audit of Alleghany’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 and the filing of the related Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The audit reports of KPMG on the consolidated financial statements of Alleghany and its subsidiaries as of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

The audit reports of KPMG on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.

During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the subsequent interim period through the filing of Alleghany’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 on February 24, 2012, there were (i) no disagreements between Alleghany and KPMG on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of KPMG, would have caused KPMG to make reference thereto in their reports on the consolidated financial statements for such years, and (ii) no “reportable events” as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the subsequent interim period through February 24, 2012, Alleghany did not consult with E&Y regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on Alleghany’s consolidated financial statements, and neither a written report was provided to Alleghany nor oral advice was provided that E&Y concluded was an important factor considered by Alleghany in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement,” as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K, or a “reportable event,” as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

Alleghany provided KPMG with a copy of a Form 8-K/A disclosing the above matters, which was filed on February 28, 2012. KPMG furnished Alleghany with a letter addressed to the SEC stating that KPMG agreed with the statements made in the Form 8-K/A, except that KPMG was not in a position to agree or disagree with Alleghany’s statement that E&Y’s engagement was approved by the Audit Committee or with Alleghany’s statement that E&Y was not engaged regarding the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on Alleghany’s consolidated financial statements, or the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. A copy of such letter, dated February 28, 2012, was filed as Exhibit 16 to the Form 8-K/A.

Alleghany expects that representatives of KPMG and E&Y will be present at the 20122015 Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

2014 and 2013 Fees

The following table summarizes the fees for professional audit services rendered by KPMGE&Y for the audit of Alleghany’s annual consolidated financial statements and fees KPMG billedE&Y incurred for other services rendered to Alleghany for 20112014 and 2010:2013.

 

  2011   2010   2014   2013 

Audit Fees

  $2,369,470    $2,363,418    $3,809,500    $3,508,500  

Audit-Related Fees

   166,000     112,239     167,000     25,000  

Tax Fees

             122,345       

All Other Fees

        1,796            
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $2,535,470    $2,477,453    $4,098,845    $3,533,500  

The amounts shown for “Audit Fees” represent the aggregate fees for professional services KPMGE&Y rendered for the audit of Alleghany’s annual consolidated financial statements for each of the last two fiscal years, the reviews of Alleghany’s financial statements included in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and the services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings during each of the last two fiscal years. “Audit Fees” also include fees for professional services KPMGE&Y rendered for the audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The amounts shown for “Audit-Related Fees” represent the aggregate fees KPMG billedE&Y incurred for each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of Alleghany’s financial statements and that are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include due diligence assistance in connection with acquisitions, consents and procedures for registration statements consultations on accounting and audit matters, and review of certain subsidiary material contracts.responses to regulatory requests. The amountamounts shown for “All Other“Tax Fees” are for 2010 represents the aggregate fees KPMG billedservices performed in 2010conjunction with a foreign tax inspection for access to its electronic database for accounting research.years 2011 and prior.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Audit and permissible non-audit services that Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm may provide to Alleghany must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee or, between meetings of the Audit Committee, by its Chairman pursuant to authority delegated to him by the Audit Committee. The Chairman reports all pre-approval decisions made by him at the next meeting of the Audit Committee, and he has undertaken to confer with the Audit Committee to the extent that any engagement for which his pre-approval is sought is expected to generate fees for the independent registered public accounting firm in excess of $100,000. When considering the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee

considers, among other matters, whether the provision of non-audit services by the independent registered public accounting firm to Alleghany is compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm. All audit and permissible non-audit services rendered in 20112014 and 20102013 were pre-approved pursuant to these procedures.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY VOTE. THIS PROPOSAL SHALL BE ADOPTEDAPPROVED BY THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST ON THIS PROPOSAL. ABSTENTIONS AND BROKER NON-VOTES WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE RESULTS OF THIS VOTE.

-30-


Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee is currently composed of the fivesix independent directors whose names appear at the end of this report. Management is responsible for Alleghany’s internal controls and the financial reporting process. Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of Alleghany’s annual consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and for issuing a report thereon. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and review these processes and the activities of Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee members are not acting as professional accountants or auditors, and their responsibilities are not intended to duplicate or certify the activities of management and the independent registered public accounting firm or to certify the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm under applicable rules.

For fiscal 2011, KPMG2014, Ernst & Young LLP acted as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm. In this context, the Audit Committee has met to review and discuss Alleghany’s audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20112014 and for the fiscal year then ended, including Alleghany’s specific disclosure under management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and critical accounting estimates, with management and KPMGErnst & Young LLP, Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMGErnst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing StandardsStandard No. 61, as amended, as adopted16, “Communications with Audit Committees,” issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T. KPMGBoard. Ernst & Young LLP reported to the Audit Committee regarding the critical accounting estimates and practices and the estimates and assumptions used by management in the preparation of the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20112014 and for the fiscal year then ended, all alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles that have been discussed with management, the ramifications of use of such alternative treatments and the treatment preferred by KPMGErnst & Young LLP.

KPMGErnst & Young LLP provided a report to the Audit Committee describing KPMGErnst & Young LLP’s internal quality-control procedures and related matters. KPMGErnst & Young LLP also provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding KPMGErnst & Young LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with KPMGErnst & Young LLP its independence. When considering KPMGErnst Young LLP’s independence, the Audit Committee considered, among other matters, whether KPMGErnst & Young LLP’s provision of non-audit services to Alleghany is compatible with maintaining the independence of KPMGErnst & Young LLP. All audit and permissible non-audit services in 20112014 and 20102013 were pre-approved pursuant to these procedures.

Based on the reviews and discussions with management and KPMGErnst & Young LLP referred to above, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20112014 and for the fiscal year then ended be included in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for such fiscal year.

The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2012, subject to stockholder ratification.

William K. Lavin

Rex D. Adams

Stephen P. Bradley

Karen Brenner

Dan R. CarmichaelJohn G. Foos

Raymond L.M. Wong

Audit Committee

of the Board of Directors

-31-


Proposal 4. Advisory Vote on Executive CompensationPROPOSAL 5. ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, Alleghany iswe are providing its stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the 2014 compensation we paid to Alleghany’s namedthe executive officers as reported in this proxy statement. For 2011, our named executive officers were Weston M. Hicks, Roger B. Gorham, Christopher K. Dalrymple, Jerry G. Borrelli, John Carr and our former Senior Vice President — Law, Robert M. Hart, who retired from Alleghany effective April 30, 2011, each of whom isare named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 66. As described below in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, we seek52, also referred to increase book value per share at double digit rates over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and without taking risks that we do not deem prudent. We believe that such management of risk is required in order to avoid loss of capital during periods of economic turmoil, even if it results in lower levels of capital appreciation during periods when economic conditions are more favorable. The intent ofas our executive compensation program is to provide competitive total compensation to our named executive officers on a basis that links their interests with the interests of our stockholders in creating and preserving stockholder value. Although we do not have a policy that a specified percentage of the named executive officers’ compensation be performance-based, our objective is that a significant portion of their compensation be tied to performance objectives. In general, the proportion of the compensation that is performance-based is greater for our more senior named executive officers, reflecting their greater levels of responsibility and associated greater opportunity to contribute to the attainment of our joint objectives of creating and preserving stockholder value.

The primary components of our 2011 compensation program for our named executive officers are summarized below.

Annual Compensation
Component

Key Features

Purpose

SalaryFixed annual cash amount.To provide a fixed amount of cash compensation upon which our named executive officers can rely.
Annual Cash IncentivesCompensation Committee establishes target annual incentive awards as a percentage of base salary for each named executive officer.Provides pay-for-performance component for achievement of shorter-term objectives.

Annual Compensation
Component

Key Features

Purpose

Compensation Committee determines individual results for participants and payouts, based on, for more senior named executive officers, overall financial and operational performance of management and, for less senior named executive officers, individual performance.
Long-Term Equity Based IncentivesGrant of performance shares, with number of shares awarded determined as shares having a value at the date of grant equal to a percentage of base salary, which percentage is individually determined by the Compensation Committee for each named executive officer. Performance shares granted for the award period beginning on January 1, 2011 will be paid out on basis of performance over the four-year award period ending December 31,“Named Executive Officers.” For 2014, based on the average annual compound growth in Alleghany’s book value per share, subject to adjustment for performance relative to the S&P 500 Index over the same period.Provides pay-for-performance component focused on achievement of longer-term objective of increasing book value per share at double digit rates over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and without taking risks that we do not deem prudent.
Retirement BenefitCompletion of five years of service is required to receive any retirement benefit and payout of the full retirement benefit requires 15 years of service. Prior to January 1, 2011, the benefit payable under the retirement plan was basedProvides a fixed component of total compensation. Since Alleghany’s senior executives are typically recruited mid-career, assists in attracting senior level talent.

Annual Compensation
Component

Key Features

Purpose

upon a formula that considered both annual base salary and annual cash incentives. Effective January 1, 2011, annual cash incentives earned for years subsequent to 2010 are not considered in the computation of the retirement benefit. Long-term incentives are not taken into account in computing retirement benefits.
Savings Benefit under Deferred Compensation PlanAnnual credit of an amount equal to 15% of base salary.Provides a stable component of total compensation.

In addition to the components of executive compensation described above, during 2011, Weston M. Hicks, Alleghany’s PresidentJoseph P. Brandon, Christopher K. Dalrymple, Roger B. Gorham and chief executive officer, participated in the ACP Incentive Program, a cash incentive plan that was established by the Compensation Committee under the 2010 MIP in January 2011. In January 2012, the Compensation Committee determined to discontinue the ACP Incentive Program.John L. Sennott, Jr. were our Named Executive Officers.

Please read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 4934 of this proxy statement as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables, notes and narrative appearing on pages 6134 through 8166 of this proxy statement, which provide detailed information on the compensation of our named executive officers.Named Executive Officers for 2014.

For a discussion of the results of past advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers and the Compensation Committee’s response to such results, including its determination to restore the concept of target and maximum opportunities to 2015 annual incentive awards under the 2010 MIP, see “Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation” on pages 41 and 42.

The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that Alleghany’s 2014 executive compensation program has beenwas designed appropriately and is working to assureensured that management’s interests arewere aligned with the interests of Alleghany stockholders. Accordingly, we are asking our stockholders to vote in favor of the following advisory resolution at the 20122015 Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Alleghany Corporation (“Alleghany”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of Alleghany’s named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table, and the

related compensation tables, notes and narrative set forth in the proxy statement for Alleghany’s 20122015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Although this advisory resolution,vote, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” resolution,“say on pay,” is non-bindingnot binding on Alleghany, the Compensation Committee or the Board, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions about our executive compensation program. Abstentions and broker non-votes (see “Information About Voting”) will not be counted in evaluating the results of the vote.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY VOTE. THIS PROPOSAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST ON THIS PROPOSAL. ABSTENTIONS AND BROKER NON-VOTES WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE RESULTS OF THIS VOTE.

All Other Matters That May Come Before the 2012 Annual Meeting

As of the date of this proxy statement, the Board knows of no business that will be presented for consideration at the 2012 Annual Meeting other than that referred to above. As to other business, if any, that may come before the 2012 Annual Meeting, shares represented by proxy will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the person or persons voting the proxies.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The name, age, current position, date elected and five-year business history of each of Alleghany’s executive officers is as follows:

 

Name

Age

Current Position (date elected)

Business Experience During

Last 5 Years

Weston M. Hicks55President, chief executive officer (since December 2004)Executive Vice President, Alleghany (from October 2002 to December 2004).
Joseph P. Brandon53Executive Vice President (since March 2012)Consultant to Alleghany (September 2011 to March 2012); Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, General Re Corporation, a property and casualty reinsurer and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (2001 to September 2008).
Roger B. Gorham49Senior Vice President — Finance and Investments and chief financial officer (since January 2006)Senior Vice President — Finance and chief financial officer, Alleghany (from May 2005 to January 2006); Senior Vice President — Finance, Alleghany (from December 2004 to May 2005).
Christopher K. Dalrymple44Senior Vice President (since January 2012) — General Counsel (since July 2009) and Secretary (since January 2011)Vice President, Alleghany (from December 2004 to January 2012) — Associate General Counsel, Alleghany (from March 2002 to July 2009) and Assistant Secretary, Alleghany (from March 2002 — January 2011).

-32-

Name

Age

Current Position (date elected)

Business Experience During

Last 5 Years

Jerry G. Borrelli46Vice President — Finance and chief accounting officer (since July 2006)Vice President — Finance, Alleghany (from February 2006).
John Carr51Vice President — Tax Director (since March 2007)Vice President — Tax Director (since March 2007).


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has met to review and discuss with Alleghany’s management the specific disclosure contained under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis and Compensation Matters” appearingAnalysis” beginning on pages 49 through81 below.page 34. Based on its review and discussions with management regarding such disclosure, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.2014.

Dan R. CarmichaelIan H. Chippendale

Thomas S. Johnson

William K. Lavin

Phillip M. Martineau

James F. Will

Raymond L.M. Wong

Compensation Committee

of the Board of Directors

-33-


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AND COMPENSATION MATTERS

Compensation Philosophy and General DescriptionObjectives

We are managedOur corporate objective is to create stockholder value through owning and managing operating subsidiaries and investments, anchored by a small professional staff, including our President, our Executive Vice President, two Senior Vice Presidentscore position in property and four Vice Presidents.casualty reinsurance and insurance. Our executive compensation program is administered by the Compensation Committee which is composed entirely of independent directors. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves annually allintended to provide competitive total compensation decisions relating to our officers. We referNamed Executive Officers that is aligned with the interests of our stockholders in increasing our common stockholders’ equity per share at rates of 7-10% over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and without taking imprudent risks. This approach enables us to manage risk to avoid loss of capital during periods of economic turmoil, which we believe creates maximum value for stockholders in the long term, even if it results in lower levels of capital appreciation during periods when economic conditions are more favorable.

The foundation of our executive compensation program rests on the following principles that we believe align our program with the interests of our stockholders:

What We Do

Performance-Based Compensation
Elements are Significant

•    In 2014, approximately 85% of Mr. Hicks’ direct compensation (salary, annual incentive compensation, long-term incentive compensation and savings benefit), and at least 50% of the direct compensation for each of our other Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Gorham (at approximately 40%) depended upon our financial performance.

•    All of Mr. Hicks’ long-term incentive compensation is directly tied to our financial performance and subject to forfeiture if threshold performance is not achieved.

Our Incentive Awards are “Capped”

•    Individual awards under our short and long-term incentive plans are “capped” at reasonable amounts and performance goals are set at realistic levels to eliminate the potential for unintended windfalls and to avoid encouraging the use of excessive financial leverage and taking of imprudent risks.

Robust Stock Ownership Guidelines

•    We require our officers to own a substantial amount of our common stock, including five times base salary for Mr. Hicks, to ensure that they maintain a significant stake in our long-term success. In addition, our Named Executive Officers have significant exposure to Alleghany through unvested performance shares and, for some of our Named Executive Officers, shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units, the value of which is tied to the market price of our common stock.

We can “Claw Back” Compensation

•    We have in place a compensation clawback policy applicable to our Named Executive Officers to further discourage imprudent risk taking.

-34-


What We Do

We Limit Perquisites to Insignificant Amounts

•    Our general practice is to not provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers. In 2014, no Named Executive Officer received more than $10,000 in perquisites or other personal benefits.

Independent Compensation Consultant

•    The Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consulting firm which provides no other services to Alleghany.

What We Don’t Do

No Stock Options

•    We do not grant stock options.

No Accelerated Vesting of Performance Shares upon Termination or a Change-in-Control

•    Performance share and restricted stock awards under long-term incentive plans do not provide for accelerated vesting in the event of a termination of employment by Alleghany, other than on a pro-rated basis for performance shares based on Alleghany performance through date of termination in the event of a termination without cause.

•    Awards under our short and long-term incentive plans do not provide for accelerated vesting upon a change-in-control.

No Hedging or Pledging of Stock

•    We have in place a policy applicable to our Named Executive Officers that prohibits them from hedging or pledging Alleghany securities they hold.

2014 Compensation Program Component Summary

The primary components of our 2014 compensation program for our Named Executive Officers are summarized below.

Annual Compensation
Component
Key FeaturesPurpose

Dollar Amounts

Involved

Salary

Fixed annual cash amount.Provides a fixed amount of cash compensation upon which our Named Executive Officers can rely.2014 salaries for our Named Executive Officers as a group totaled $3.6 million.

Annual Cash Incentives

The Compensation Committee establishes annual incentive award opportunities as a percentage of base salary for Named Executive Officers.

The Compensation Committee determines individual results for

Provides pay-for-performance component for achievement of shorter-term objectives.The maximum amount of annual incentive awards payable to our Named Executive Officers as a group for 2014 was approximately $5.5 million.

-35-


Annual Compensation
Component
Key FeaturesPurpose

Dollar Amounts

Involved

participants and payouts based on overall financial and operational performance of management.

Long-Term Equity

  -Based Incentives

Grant of performance shares having a value at the date of grant equal to a percentage of base salary, which percentage is individually determined by the Compensation Committee for each Named Executive Officer. Performance shares granted for the award period beginning on January 1, 2014 will be paid out on the basis of performance over the four-year award period ending December 31, 2017, based on the average annual compound growth in Alleghany’s book value per share.Provides pay-for-performance component focused on achievement of longer-term objective of increasing book value per share at rates of 7-10% over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and without taking imprudent risks.Performance share awards to our Named Executive Officers as a group in 2014 had a grant date fair value of approximately $7.8 million.

Grant of shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units to certain officers, having a value at the date of grant equal to a percentage of base salary, which percentage is individually determined by the Compensation Committee for each such officer. The value of such awards depends on the market price of our common stock and the awards cliff-vest four years from date of grant.

Provides a retention element of total compensation.Awards of restricted stock to certain of our Named Executive Officers had a grant date fair value of approximately $0.6 million in 2014.

Total 2014 Salary, Annual Incentive and LTIP Award Amount

= $17.5 million

-36-


In addition to the executive officerssalary, annual cash incentives and long-term equity-based incentives described above, our Named Executive Officers receive an annual savings benefit under Alleghany’s deferred compensation plan, the “Deferred Compensation Plan,” in an amount equal to 15% of base salary. Our Named Executive Officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table setting forth the compensationhave completed five years of Messrs. Hicks, Gorham, Dalrymple, Borrelli, Carr and Robert M. Hart, who was our Senior Vice President – Law until April 30, 2011, for 2011, 2010 and 2009 as our “Named Executive Officers.” Joseph P. Brandon, who was appointed as Executive Vice Presidentservice with Alleghany or a subsidiary of Alleghany uponare eligible to receive a benefit (fifteen years of service is required in order to receive the closingfull benefit) under a retirement plan. Effective December 31, 2013, the retirement plan was closed to new participants, and no additional benefits for existing participants have accrued after such date.

Alleghany Performance in 2014

A summary of the acquisitionsome highlights of Alleghany’s results in 2014 follows:

Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share at year-end 2014 was $465.51, an increase of 12.7% from common stockholders’ equity per share of $412.96 at year-end 2013. Strong underwriting results, primarily at wholly-owned subsidiaries Transatlantic Holdings, Inc., or “TransRe,” and RSUI Group, Inc., or “RSUI,” appreciation in Alleghany’s investment portfolio and accretive repurchases of common stock all contributed to double-digit growth in common stockholders’ equity per share.

Net earnings were $679.2 million in 2014, compared with $628.4 million in 2013, representing a 9.4% return on March 6, 2012, is not includedequity for both years.

TransRe and RSUI produced double-digit returns on equity. TransRe’s growth in the Summarystockholder’s equity (adjusted for capital contributions and dividends) was 14.4%, while RSUI’s growth in stockholder’s equity (adjusted for dividends) was 13.4%, which we believe are strong growth rates in a low inflation/deflationary environment.

Alleghany reported a consolidated underwriting profit in 2014 of $494.8 million, compared with $420.7 million in 2013, and a consolidated combined ratio of 88.8% in 2014, compared with 90.1% in 2013, reflecting excellent underwriting results at TransRe and RSUI.

Alleghany’s wholly-owned subsidiaries CapSpecialty, Inc., or “CapSpecialty,” and Pacific Compensation TableCorporation, or “PacificComp,” made significant progress in reducing underwriting losses, while improving their capabilities and is not includedcompetitive positioning.

Alleghany made progress in building its wholly-owned subsidiary Alleghany Capital Corporation’s portfolio of non-financial businesses, including Jazwares, LLC, Bourn & Koch, Inc., R.C. Tway Company, LLC, Stranded Oil Resources Corporation and ORX Exploration, Inc.

The above positives were partially outweighed by performance of Alleghany’s equity portfolio which returned 5.6% in 2014, reflecting weak returns on consumer discretionary, energy and industrial holdings that more than offset strong returns in technology and health care holdings.

Additional information regarding Alleghany’s 2014 results, including audited consolidated financial statements, as a “Named Executive Officer” herein because he was not an executive officer of Alleghany in 2011.

Mr. Hicks, President of Alleghany, is our chief executive officer and chief operating officer. Subject to the control of the Board, Mr. Hicks has direct power and authority over the business and affairs of Alleghany. Mr. Gorham, Senior Vice President-Finance and Investments, is chief financial officer of Alleghany and his responsibilities include management and oversight of our group-wide fixed income portfolios. Mr. Dalrymple, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, is the chief legal officer of Alleghany. His responsibilities include structuring and implementation of business acquisitions and dispositions, assisting the Compensation Committeewell as MD&A with respect to group-wide executive compensation arrangements and advising2014 results, is contained in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Board and its Committees regarding corporate governance matters. Mr. Borrelli, Vice President, isyear ended December 31, 2014, or the chief accounting officer of Alleghany and his responsibilities include the development, implementation, and administration of accounting policies and oversight of Alleghany’s accounting and financial controls functions, including as they relate to filings“Form 10-K,” which was filed with the SEC and other regulatory reports. Mr. Carr, Vice President, ison February 24, 2015. Readers are urged to review the Tax Director of Alleghany and his responsibilities include oversightForm 10-K for a more complete discussion of Alleghany’s core tax compliance, tax planning,financial performance.

Alleghany Long-Term Performance

We believe that Alleghany’s performance is best measured over the long term. 2014 marked Mr. Hicks’ tenth year as Alleghany’s President and tax accounting functions, includingchief executive officer. Over that period, Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share has compounded annually at approximately 9%, at the upper end of Alleghany’s stated strategic objective of 7-10% annual growth in connection with business acquisitions and dispositions. Mr. Brandon, our Executive Vice President, is primarily responsible forcommon stockholders’ equity per share over the oversightlong term. This period included a major financial crisis, when a number of financial institutions suffered a permanent capital loss, as well as a number of significant natural catastrophes that challenged Alleghany’s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries.businesses.

At our Annual Meeting

-37-


The chart below summarizes Alleghany’s performance over the ten-year period from December 31, 2004 to December 31, 2014, with all values indexed to December 31, 2004. During this ten-year period, Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share increased at a compound annual rate of Stockholders in April 2011, we conducted our first advisory vote on8.7%, compared with a compound annual rate of return of 7.7% for the compensationStandard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, or the “S&P 500,” and the price of our executive officers namedAlleghany common stock (adjusted for stock dividends) appreciated at a 6.4% compound annual rate of return.

LOGO

As indicated by the data presented in the Summary Compensation Table

includedtable above, Alleghany’s growth in common stockholders’ equity per share has been relatively consistent. The trading price of Alleghany’s common stock has been more volatile, reflecting the volatility of the stock market in general. In Alleghany’s view, the relatively steady increase in growth in common stockholders’ equity per share, as compared with the more volatile trading price of Alleghany’s common stock, supports Alleghany’s determination to focus its executive compensation incentive program on building stockholders’ equity over time. In terms of Alleghany’s overall performance over the past decade, the data presented in the proxy statement for our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and approximately 98.8%table above indicates that Alleghany’s growth in common stockholders’ equity per share has exceeded the S&P 500 return in eight of the votes cast on such proposal were votedlast ten years, and the increase in favorAlleghany’s stock price has exceeded the S&P 500 return in five of the proposal. Aslast ten years.

-38-


During this same ten-year period, we believe that Mr. Hicks’ compensation has been well-aligned with Alleghany’s long-term performance as can be seen in the table below.

10 Year Pay-TSR Alignment

($ in thousands)

LOGO

Year

 2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  5 Year
CAGR

2009 -
2014
(%)
  10 Year
CAGR

2004  -
2014
(%)
 

CEO Total Compensation(1)

 $10,676(2)  $3,781   $4,566   $6,522   $6,435   $6,206   $5,636   $7,347   $7,332   $6,216   $10,543    

Pension Value Increase/(Decrease)

 $850   $850   $856   $1,160   $1,594   $1,066   $822   $1,922   $1,259   $(1,232 $2,914    

CEO Compensation Excluding Pension(3)

 $9,826   $2,931   $3,710   $5,361   $4,840   $5,140   $4,814   $5,425   $6,072   $7,448   $7,629    8  (2%) 

Indexed TSR(4)

  100    102    133    150    107    107    121    115    135    161    187    12  6

TSR vs. CEO Compensation (excluding pension) Increases / Decreases

  

  4%   9% 

Indexed BVPS Growth

  100    104    120    138    131    144    159    168    186    202    228    10  9

BVPS vs. CEO Compensation (excluding pension) Increases / Decreases

  

  1%   11% 

(1)Includes annual fluctuation in pension value. Calculated according to SEC rules except for 2013, which includes a negative amount for the change in value of Mr. Hicks’ pension benefit. SEC rules require that negative pension value changes are reflected as a “zero” for purposes of calculating total compensation contained in the Summary Compensation Table on page 52.

(2)Includes a special, one-time award of 29,877 (adjusted for subsequent stock dividends) performance-based restricted shares of common stock to Mr. Hicks upon his election as chief executive officer of Alleghany. This award vested on December 31, 2012.

(3)Excludes annual change in pension value. Change in actuarial present value of pension benefits is subject to many external variables, such as interest rates, that are not related to Alleghany performance. Therefore, we do not believe a year-over-year change in actuarial pension value is helpful in evaluating compensation for comparative purposes, and believe that stockholders may find the detailed explanation of changes in actuarial pension value under “Change in Pension Value” on pages 56 and 57 to be useful for an understanding of change in pension benefit values.

(4)Total Shareholder Return reflects Alleghany share price appreciation including the impact of stock dividends.

-39-


Compensation Committee had already made its determinations regarding 2011 compensation prior toProcess

Compensation Determination Timetable

General Setting of Salary and Incentive Awards

Salary adjustments for the time of our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, none of the Committee’s subsequent actions or decisions with respect to the compensation of our executive officers in 2011 was directly attributable to the results of the vote. However, the Compensation Committee reviewed the outcome of the advisory votecoming year and believes that the level of support achieved reflects favorably on our executive compensation philosophy. Based on the advisory vote of our shareholders at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in favor of holding an annual vote on executive compensation, the Board determined that Alleghany will hold stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation every year. The Compensation Committee intends to review the outcome of the 2012 advisory vote and future advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as one of the relevant factors in structuring our executive compensation program.

Compensation adjustments andnew incentive awards are made annually by the Compensation Committee at a meeting in January. Mr. Dalrymple supportsJanuary, and the Compensation Committee determined 2014 salaries, 2014 annual incentive awards and 2014-2017 long-term incentive awards for all of the Named Executive Officers at its January 2014 meeting. That meeting commenced immediately following the January 2014 meeting of the Board, at which the Board reviewed and discussed:

an evaluation of preliminary 2013 financial results for Alleghany;

an evaluation of Mr. Hicks’ 2013 performance and priorities for 2014;

a report by Mr. Hicks on management succession and development throughout Alleghany;

the recommendation of Mr. Hicks regarding the individual performance of each Named Executive Officer and

Alleghany’s projections and plan for 2014 through 2016.

Setting of Mr. Hicks’ 2014 Compensation

In determining Mr. Hicks’ 2014 compensation, the Compensation Committee at its January 2014 meeting reviewed Mr. Hicks’ 2013 performance and 2014 priorities, as described above, as well as all components of Mr. Hicks’ 2013 compensation, including annual salary, annual cash incentive compensation in respect of 2013, outstanding performance share awards, values of previous awards of restricted stock and benefits under Alleghany’s Deferred Compensation Plan, Alleghany’s medical, long-term disability and other employee welfare plans and the freezing of Alleghany’s Retirement Plan at year-end 2013.

Payouts of Awards in Respect of 2014 Performance

The Compensation Committee generally determines the payout of awards for prior performance periods at a meeting in February, upon the completion of the year-end audit of prior year financial statements. With respect to 2014, the Compensation Committee determined payouts to the Named Executive Officers, including Mr. Hicks, of 2014 annual incentive awards and 2011-2014 long-term incentive awards at its work. In addition toFebruary 2015 meeting. Payout determinations were based on Board and Compensation Committee discussions and determinations regarding Alleghany’s financial performance for 2014 and applicable award periods, an evaluation of Mr. Dalrymple,Hicks’ 2014 performance, and the recommendation of Mr. Hicks regarding the individual performance of the other Named Executive Officers.

Compensation Committee Advisors and Services

The Compensation Committee has retained the Compensation Consultant, Grahall Partners,Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., or “FW Cook,” as a compensation consultant to assist the Compensation Committee in its review of executive and director compensation practices, including the competitiveness of Alleghany executive salaries,compensation, executive compensation program design matters, market trends and technical considerations. Prior to its determination to retain FW Cook, the Compensation Committee reviewed and assessed the independence of FW Cook as a firm and the individuals providing advice to the Compensation Committee in compliance with the NYSE’s listing standards. The Compensation Committee determined that FW Cook as a firm and the relevant individual advisers were independent.

The nature and scope of services that the Compensation ConsultantFW Cook provides to the Compensation Committee include:include the following: competitive market compensation analyses,analyses; assistance with the redesign of any compensation or benefit

-40-


programs as necessary or requested,requested; assistance with respect to analyzing the impact of regulatory and/or accounting developments on Alleghanyour compensation plans and programs,programs; and preparation for and attendance at selected Compensation Committee meetings. The Compensation ConsultantFW Cook is also advisesavailable to advise the Compensation Committee and management on various executive compensation matters involving Alleghany’sour operating subsidiaries. The Chairman of the Compensation Committee reviews and approves all services provided by the Compensation ConsultantFW Cook and fees to be paid by Alleghany pays to the Compensation Consultant.

Our corporate objective is to create stockholder value through the ownership and management of a small group of operating subsidiaries and investments. In this regard, we seek to increase book value per share at double digit rates over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and without taking risks that we do not deem prudent. We believe that such management of risk is required in order to avoid loss of capital during periods of economic turmoil, even if it results in lower levels of capital appreciation during

periods when economic conditions are more favorable. The intent of our executive compensation program is to provide competitive total compensation to the Named Executive Officers on a basis, as discussed below, that links their interests with the interests of our stockholders in creating and preserving stockholder value.FW Cook.

In evaluating our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee has been advised from time to time by the Compensation ConsultantFW Cook as to the compensation levels of other companies including companies much larger than ours, that might compete with us for executive talent. Competitive market data have been periodically developed by the Compensation ConsultantFW Cook from several different sources, including proxy statements and various published compensation survey sources regarding various layers of the market to which Alleghany executives might be recruited, including larger companies, private equity and hedge funds.statements. We do not seek to set our executive compensation to any benchmarks or peer group but use the competitive market data to provide insights into our compensation levels, mix and strategies. Our senior officers have all been recruited in mid-career, and our compensation must be reasonably competitive with that of their former employers. However, we do not seek to compete for executive talent solely on the basis of compensation. Rather, we also compete by offering a unique professional opportunity to work in a high integrity environment where the focus is on building long-term stockholder value.

Although we do not haveAdvisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Alleghany holds a policy thatstockholder advisory vote on executive compensation, commonly referred to as “say on pay,” every year. At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders in April 2014, approximately 84% of the votes cast were voted in favor of our “say on pay” proposal. However, the favorable percentage vote for our 2014 “say on pay” proposal was lower than the prior year when it was 99%. The Compensation Committee believes this decrease in favorable votes was due to criticism made by one of the major proxy advisory services of certain aspects of our executive compensation program and such proxy advisory service’s recommendation to vote against our 2014 “say on pay” proposal.

The Compensation Committee monitors the results of Alleghany’s “say on pay” proposal when evaluating the effectiveness of Alleghany’s compensation policies and disclosures, particularly in the event of a specifiednegative vote or significant change in the percentage of the Named Executive Officers’ compensation be performance-based, our objective is thatfavorable votes with regard to such proposal. As a significant portionresult of the Named Executive Officers’lower favorable vote in 2014, the Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Compensation Committee, as well as members of management, engaged in discussions with many of Alleghany’s largest stockholders (holding in the aggregate approximately 58% of Alleghany’s outstanding common stock) about Alleghany’s executive compensation be tiedprogram. The purpose of this outreach was to explain in more detail the Compensation Committee’s approach to compensation and rationale for its decisions, as well as hear any concerns from our stockholders in this regard. During these discussions, stockholders provided feedback on a variety of topics. With respect to compensation matters, stockholders noted that they were generally pleased with Alleghany’s financial performance. We seekperformance, as well as the leadership of our Chairman and President and chief executive officer and other Alleghany management, and they were generally supportive of many aspects of our executive compensation program. However, some stockholders noted that they would like to incentivize achievementbetter understand the structure of realisticour annual incentive awards and would like to see more disclosure regarding the performance goals without employing excessive financial leverage or undue operating risk. Thus,metrics and mechanics with respect to such awards made under the 2010 MIP.

In response to the above stockholder discussions, during the second half of 2014, the Compensation Committee reviewed the structure of annual cash incentive awards under the 2010 MIP and, in consultation with FW Cook, considered possible revisions. In this regard, the Compensation Committee discussed, among other things, the rationales underlying the various alternatives, the mechanics and process involved in either changing the form of compensation under the 2010 MIP or eliminating annual incentive awards, the benefits and costs of the various alternatives, alignment of the various alternatives with the best interests of Alleghany and its long-term equity-based incentivesstockholders, and the possibility and desirability of revising awards under the 2002 LTIP2010 MIP so as to include threshold, target and 2007 LTIP are “capped” at a maximum payout once a certain levelopportunities.

-41-


After deliberation, the Compensation Committee determined that it would restore the concept of financial performance is attained. If approved by stockholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting, any long-term equity-based incentives grantedtarget and maximum opportunities to 2015 annual incentive awards under the 2012 LTIP will be similarly capped at2010 MIP. With respect to such 2015 annual incentive awards, target opportunities were reduced from 2014 target opportunities (as described on page 44), and as a percentage of salary and dollar amount are as follows:

    2015 Salary   

Target

Opportunity %

   

Target

Opportunity $

 

Mr. Hicks

  $1,000,000     170    $1,700,000  

Mr. Brandon

   800,000     135     1,080,000  

Mr. Dalrymple

   630,000     65     409,500  

Mr. Gorham

   600,000     30     180,000  

Mr. Sennott

   630,000     65     409,500  
      

 

 

 

Total 2015 Target Annual Incentive Opportunities

  $3,779,000  
    

 

 

 

Maximum incentive opportunities for 2015 annual incentive awards are 150% of target awards and as a percentage of salary and dollar amount are as follows:

    2015 Salary   

Maximum

Opportunity %

   

Maximum

Opportunity $

 

Mr. Hicks

  $1,000,000     255    $2,550,000  

Mr. Brandon

   800,000     203     1,620,000  

Mr. Dalrymple

   630,000     98     614,250  

Mr. Gorham

   600,000     43     270,000  

Mr. Sennott

   630,000     98     614,250  
      

 

 

 

Total 2015 Maximum Annual Incentive Opportunities

  

  $5,668,500  
      

 

 

 

Otherwise, the Committee determined that, as so revised, the existing structure was the most appropriate structure for annual incentive awards in light of Alleghany’s strategic objectives, the nature of Alleghany’s businesses, the overall alignment of management incentive compensation and stockholders’ interests and the current environment. As a result, for annual incentive awards made in January 2015 to the Named Executive Officers for 2015 performance, provisions for target and maximum payout. Finally, we do not grant stock optionsopportunities were made but no other material changes were made.

The Compensation Committee believes that it has listened carefully to our officers. Our goal isAlleghany’s stockholders regarding Alleghany’s executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee believes that Alleghany’s compensation practices result in an executive compensation program that best serves Alleghany and its long-term stockholders. The Compensation Committee intends to promote risk-adjusted long-term growth inreview the intrinsic valueoutcome of the 2015 “say on pay” proposal and future “say on pay” proposals on the compensation of our common stock and not just its market price. We believe that over time intrinsic value will be reflectedNamed Executive Officers as one of the relevant factors in the market pricestructuring Alleghany’s executive compensation program.

Components of our common stock.2014 Compensation

The principal components of compensation paid to theour Named Executive Officers in respect of 20112014 consisted principally of:

 

salaries;

 

annual cash incentive compensation under the 2010 MIP;

annual grants of long-term equity-based incentives;

retirement benefits;incentives under the 2012 LTIP and

 

an annual savings benefits under our Deferred Compensation Plan.benefit equal to 15% of base salary.

-42-


The Compensation Committee determined 2011 salaries and incentive awards for thepercentage that these components represent of each of our Named Executive Officer’s total direct compensation in 2014 is reflected below.

LOGO

In addition, our Named Executive Officers atreceive a meetingbenefit, assuming the completion of five years of service with Alleghany or a subsidiary of Alleghany (fifteen years of service is required in January 2011, which followedorder to receive the full benefit), under a January 2011 meeting of the Board, at which the Board reviewed and discussed an evaluation of Mr. Hicks’ 2010 performance and priorities for 2011, a report by Mr. Hicks on management succession and development throughout the Alleghany group, the recommendation of Mr. Hicks regarding the individual performance of each Named Executive Officer and Alleghany’s strategicretirement plan, for 2011-2015. The Compensation Committee determined payouts of 2011 incentive awards for the Named Executive Officers at a meetingalthough such benefit was frozen in February 2012, following a January 2012 meeting of the Board, at which the Board discussed and reviewed an evaluation of Mr. Hicks’ 2011 performance and priorities for 2012, a report by Mr. Hicks on management succession and development throughout the Alleghany group, the recommendation of Mr. Hicks regarding the individual performance of each Named Executive Officer and Alleghany’s strategic plan for 2012-2016.

In determining Mr. Hicks’ 2011 compensation, the Compensation Committee reviewed Mr. Hicks’ 2010 performance and 2011 priorities, as described above, as well as all components of Mr. Hicks’ 2010 compensation, including annual salary, annual cash incentive compensation in respect of 2010 under the 2005 Management Incentive Plan (“2005 MIP”), long-term incentive compensation under the 2002 LTIP and 2007 LTIP, values of previous awards of restricted stock and benefits under Alleghany’s Deferred Compensation Plan, Alleghany’s Retirement Plan and the medical, long-term disability and other employee welfare plans.

Perquisites

Our general practice is to not provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers. In 2011, no Named Executive Officer received more than $10,000 in perquisites or other personal benefits.

Components of Compensation2013.

Set out below in more detail is a description and analysis of theeach of these components of our compensation program.

Salary

We seek to pay salaries that are sufficiently competitive to attract and retain executive talent. The Compensation Committee generally makes salary adjustments annually, in consultation with the Compensation Consultant,FW Cook, based on salaries for the prior year, general inflation, individual performance and internal comparability considerations. In light of continued economic uncertainty, the Compensation Committee and senior management agreed that there would be no 2011 salary increaseThe following actions were taken with respect to 2014 salaries for the President, the Senior Vice President — Finance and Investments or the Senior Vice President — Law. Messrs. Borrelli and Carr received 2011 salary increases of 3% and Mr. Dalrymple received a salary increase of 19%, based upon recommendations of Mr. Hicks, taking into account general inflation, individual performance, internal comparability considerations and increased responsibilities assumed by Mr. Dalrymple.our Named Executive Officers:

    2013 Salary      2014 Salary   Rationale

Mr. Hicks

  $1,250,000    LOGO     $1,000,000    Increase percentage of compensation tied to financial performance and deductibility under Section 162(m)

Mr. Brandon

   1,000,000    LOGO      800,000    Increase percentage of compensation tied to financial performance and internal comparability considerations with respect to CEO compensation

Mr. Dalrymple

   550,000    LOGO      600,000    Recognition of 2013 performance and internal comparability considerations with other Senior Vice Presidents

Mr. Gorham

   600,000    LOGO      600,000    No change due to sufficiently competitive level of pay and increase in January 2013

Mr. Sennott

   550,000    LOGO      600,000    Recognition of 2013 performance and internal comparability considerations with other Senior Vice Presidents

-43-


Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

We generally pay annual cash incentives to theour Named Executive Officers under the 2010 MIP. These annual cash incentive awards are intended to provide a pay-for-performance element for the achievement of shorter-term objectives. In making awards under the 2010 MIP, the Compensation Committee recognizes that, given the nature of Alleghany’s business and long-term approach, how we achieve shorter-term objectives can be a subjective process, but believes this is mitigated by the fact that annual cash incentive awards under the 2010 MIP are subject to two meaningful limitations.

First, with respect to 2014 awards, no payout to any Named Executive Officer under the 2010 MIP could exceed the amount of his target annual incentive opportunity set at the beginning of 2014. Thus, for 2014, this resulted in a $2.5 million maximum award amount for Mr. Hicks and an aggregate maximum award amount of approximately $5.5 million for our Named Executive Officers as a group. Second, funding of the 2014 Incentive Pool Amount (as defined below) is limited by the level of earnings produced by management in 2014. To the extent the funding of the 2014 Incentive Pool Amount had been less than the aggregate maximum award amount of approximately $5.5 million for our Named Executive Officers as a group, a pro-rata reduction of individual award amounts would have occurred. To the extent that Alleghany had a loss for 2014, no payout would have been made under the 2010 MIP. In sum, payouts under the 2010 MIP for 2014 performance are the lesser of (i) the 2014 Incentive Pool Amount or (ii) the target opportunity for management (as may be reduced by the Compensation Committee for individual performance).

2014 Process

Target annual incentive awards in respect of performance for 2014 were made by the Compensation Committee on January 21, 2014. 2014 target annual incentive awards under the 2010 MIP arewere stated as a percentage of each Named Executive Officer’s base salary. Target annual incentive awards in respect of performance for 2011salary and were made by the Compensation Committee on January 18, 2011, and target bonus opportunities were 110% of salary for Mr. Hicks, 65% of salary for each of Messrs. Gorham and Dalrymple and 40% for Messrs. Borrelli and Carr. Maximum incentive opportunities for 2011 were 150% of target awards. Mr. Hart did not participate in the annual incentive program for 2011 due to his pending retirement. as follows:

    2014
Salary
   

Target

Opportunity %

   

Target

Opportunity $ 

 

Mr. Hicks

  $1,000,000     250    $2,500,000  

Mr. Brandon

   800,000     200     1,600,000  

Mr. Dalrymple

   600,000     100     600,000  

Mr. Gorham

   600,000     40     240,000  

Mr. Sennott

   600,000     100     600,000  
      

 

 

 

Total 2014 Annual Incentive Opportunities

  

  $5,540,000  
      

 

 

 

The differing target awards as a percentage of salary reflect the Compensation Committee’s determinations of appropriate levels and mix of compensation components, taking into account competitive considerations, varying levels of responsibility, within Alleghany, internal comparability, and the implicit impact of the various Named Executive Officer levels on the accomplishment of ourAlleghany’s financial, strategic and operational objectives.objectives and competitive considerations.

For 2011, payoutPayout of 2014 awards under the 2010 MIP to our most senior named executive officers, Messrs. Hicks and Gorham, was tied to the achievement of a specified financial performance objectivesobjective, subject to reduction in respect of Alleghany performance and/or individual performance. The 2011financial performance objective was set in January 2014, after evaluating projected earnings for 2014 and determining each Named Executive Officer’s appropriate target opportunity amount. With respect to individual performance objectives, in January 2014, each of our Named Executive Officers submitted individual objectives for the coming year, with Mr. Hicks submitting his to the Board and the other Named Executive Officers submitting their individual objectives to Mr. Hicks. These objectives are in addition to the core responsibilities of our Named Executive Officers. Status updates on the achievement of such individual objectives and performance of core responsibilities were given through the year by each Named Executive Officer, culminating in a final report made in advance of payout determinations made by the Board and Compensation Committee in February 2015.

-44-


In this regard, Mr. Hicks provided a self-evaluation to the Board of his performance against objectives during the year and Messrs. Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Sennott provided Mr. Hicks with the same, which Mr. Hicks then reviewed with the Compensation Committee.

Financial Performance Objective

The 2014 financial performance goal established by the Compensation Committee for annual incentive awards to Messrs. Hicks and Gorham under the 2010 MIPour Named Executive Officers was based on a funding approach, with a 2011 Incentive Poolwhich was capped at an amount equal to consist3% of 4% of 20112014 earnings before income taxes, as reported in Alleghany’s audited financial statements, excludingas adjusted, or the “2014 Incentive Pool Amount,” to:

exclude effects of accounting changes, charges for goodwill or intangibles impairment (including other than temporary impairment charges),;

exclude expenses incurred in connection with actual and potential

acquisitions and after deduction

deduct from 2014 earnings a rolling four-year (2010-2013) average of catastrophe losses at RSUI, our principal insurance subsidiary, and TransRe, our principal reinsurance subsidiary, instead of actual 2014 catastrophe losses at RSUI and TransRe.

With respect to catastrophe losses, RSUI’s 2010-2013 catastrophe average was $88.7 million, or the “RSUI CAT Average,” compared with 2014 actual catastrophe losses of RSUI Group, Inc., Alleghany’s principal insurance subsidiary (“RSUI”), for 2008-2010 of $43.9$44.4 million (the “RSUIand TransRe’s 2010-2013 catastrophe average was $356.2 million, or the “TransRe CAT Average”), but excluding RSUIAverage,” compared with 2014 actual catastrophe losses of $46.8 million. These differences mean that an additional $353.7 million of catastrophe losses were deducted from Alleghany’s pre-tax earnings in excessdetermining the funding for the 2014 Incentive Pool Amount than would have been deducted from Alleghany’s pre-tax earnings using actual 2014 catastrophe losses.

The use of the RSUI CAT Average (the “2011 Incentive Pool”). The use of the RSUIand TransRe CAT Average rather than the actual amount of RSUItheir respective 2014 catastrophe losses in determining the amount of the 2011 Incentive Pool was based upon the Compensation Committee’s acknowledgement that RSUI is aand TransRe are significant writerwriters of catastrophe exposed property (re)insurance and that management cannot predict the occurrence or severity of catastrophe losses in any particular year.

Based upon our 2011 Plan, 4% of our 2011 earnings before income taxes, adjusted to set RSUI Using a four-year average recognizes that catastrophe losses atare a cost of doing business and accounts for them in a manner consistent with Alleghany’s focus on long-term performance. In this regard, actual catastrophe losses, whether in excess of, or less than, actual catastrophe losses in a particular year, impact funding calculations for annual incentive pools during the RSUI CAT Average, was $3.3 million. The Compensation Committee setfour-year averaging period in which they are included. A year in which Alleghany experiences significant catastrophe losses will impact MIP annual incentive pool funding for the aggregate maximumsubsequent four years, holding management fully accountable for all payouts of awards madesuch catastrophe losses.

Individual Performance Objectives

In January 2014, Mr. Hicks provided the Board, and Messrs. Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Sennott provided Mr. Hicks, with their objectives for 2014 that were in respect of the 2011 Incentive Pool at $2.2 million, allowing a cushionaddition to provide it with more flexibility when evaluating 2011 results. As required for an award intended to be a qualifying award under Section 162(m) of the Code, each of Messrs. Hicks and Gorham was allocated an interest in the 2011 Incentive Pool based upon his target award as a percentage of the aggregate target awards in respect of the 2011 Incentive Pool. Thus, for 2010 MIP awards made to Messrs. Hicks and Gorham, financial performance was based upon the 2011 Incentive Pool (as defined above) with the Compensation Committee specifically empowered to reduce awards, individually or in the aggregate, in its discretion and in any amount, based on its evaluation of the overall financial and operational performance of Messrs. Hickstheir core responsibilities. These core and Gorham and their individual performance.2014 objectives for our Named Executive Officers included the following:

Based on actual 2011 results, the amount of the 2011 Incentive Pool was $9.7 million, which exceeded the $2.2 million aggregate maximum set by the Compensation Committee for the 2011 Incentive Pool when it made awards to Messrs.

Core Responsibilities2014 Objectives

Mr. Hicks

•    Building stockholder value over the long-term, reported and measured regularly

•    Consolidated 2014 financial results

•    Ultimate responsibility for reinsurance and insurance subsidiary underwriting performance

•    Improve the competitive positions of CapSpecialty and PacificComp

•    Work with TransRe on its strategic alternatives in the current reinsurance market cycle

•    Oversee the continued development of Alleghany’s in-house private and public equity subsidiaries

-45-


Core Responsibilities2014 Objectives

•    Ultimate responsibility for equity and fixed income portfolio investment performance

•    Management development at parent and subsidiaries

Mr. Brandon

•    Primary operational oversight of Alleghany’s reinsurance and insurance subsidiaries

•    Ensure that each insurance subsidiary meets its 2014 business plan

•    Oversee the operations of TransRe from a parent-level and stockholder perspective as Chairman of TransRe’s Board of Directors

•    Assist the CEO with the strategic development of Alleghany and its insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries

•    Evaluate and implement, as applicable, TransRe third party capital initiatives

•    Work with TransRe to develop incremental profitable business opportunities

•    Monitor TransRe economic capital model

•    Work with PacificComp and CapSpecialty management teams on profitability initiatives

Mr. Dalrymple

•    Ultimate oversight for management of all legal issues at parent and subsidiaries, including transactional, litigation and regulatory

•    Oversight of corporate governance and secretarial functions

•    Ultimate legal oversight of SEC disclosure reports

•    Ultimate oversight of legal costs at parent and subsidiaries

•    Complete legal transition of in-house private equity and public equity divisions into subsidiaries

•    Work with CapSpecialty on legal aspects of new compensation plans and strategic initiatives

•    Work with TransRe legal on proposed strategic initiatives

•    Analyze opportunities for further efficiencies with respect to legal costs

Mr. Gorham

•    Management of $16.0 billion fixed income portfolio

•    Chairman of TransRe, RSUI and PacificComp Board of Directors investment committees

•    Treasurer for Alleghany

•    Improve reporting from outside bond managers

•    Manage regulatory issues with respect to fixed income portfolio foreign exchange programs

•    Execute on allocation of fixed income to Ares Management LP

•    Set investment guidelines for new TransRe London Limited subsidiary

Mr. Sennott

•    Principal financial officer responsible for the fair and accurate presentation of the financial results

•    Oversight of Alleghany financial function and maintenance of control environment

•    Responsible for capital management and annual strategic planning efforts

•    Responsible for rating agency relationships and management

•    Update, improve and streamline internal financial analysis

•    Oversee risk management initiatives in 2014

•    Oversee improvements to Alleghany website

•    Complete and present overarching review and analysis of capital management initiatives

-46-


Payouts under the 2010 MIP with respect to 2014 Performance

Based on our 2014 financial results, the 2014 Incentive Pool Amount was $19.2 million, so that Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Sennott were eligible to receive full payout in January 2011.February 2015 of their 2014 target incentive opportunities, aggregating to $5.5 million, under the 2010 MIP based on achievement of the financial performance goal, subject to reduction for individual performance. At its meeting on February 23, 2012,24, 2015, the Compensation Committee determined thatevaluated Alleghany’s overall corporate performance and the goals for 2011 Incentive Pool awards to Messrs. Hicks and Gorham were achieved for maximum payout. The Compensation Committee then evaluated individual performance of the President, the President’sMr. Hicks, and Mr. Hicks’ recommendation regarding the individual performance of the other Named Executive Officers.

With respect to Mr. Hicks’ individual performance, the Compensation Committee noted the following achievements, among others, during 2014:

2014 growth in book value of 12.7%;

Growth in book value per share of 9.6% over a five-year period and growth in book value of 8.6% over a ten-year period;

Record underwriting results in 2014, with a consolidated underwriting profit of approximately $495 million;

Record earnings per share of $41.40 in 2014;

Improved underwriting results at CapSpecialty and PacificComp and

Benchmark outperformance by the parent company equity portfolio and fixed income portfolio during the year.

Regarding individual performance, Mr. Hicks’ recommendations reflected the achievement of individual objectives for Messrs. Brandon, Dalrymple and Sennott. For Mr. Brandon, the payout reflected the very profitable 2014 underwriting results at TransRe and RSUI, underwriting result improvements at CapSpecialty and PacificComp, support of TransRe for its third party capital initiatives and accomplishment of strategic initiatives at our (re)insurance subsidiaries. For Mr. Dalrymple, the payout reflected superior performance of his core responsibilities and achievement of his 2014 objectives, particularly with respect to CapSpecialty’s 2014 initiatives and plans, his legal support of TransRe’s strategic initiatives and the successful and efficient formalization of Alleghany’s private and public equity management operations. For Mr. Sennott, the payout reflected superior performance of his core responsibilities as well as achievement of his 2014 objectives, including improvements to Alleghany’s financial reporting, enhancements to the enterprise risk management process and the successful issuance of Alleghany long-term debt and refinancing of a portion of TransRe’s debt. For Mr. Gorham, the payout reflected the improved reporting process from outside bond managers, the successful implementation of a foreign exchange hedging capability, the deployment of assets into Ares-managed strategies and corporate performance. the establishment of investment guidelines for TransRe’s new London subsidiary.

Following such evaluation,the evaluations of Mr. Hicks and the other Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee authorized individual payoutsfull payout of 2011 Incentive Pool awards2014 target annual bonus opportunities to Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Gorham.

Payouts of awardsSennott under the 2010 MIP, for 2011 foran aggregate payout to them in the amount of approximately $5.5 million.

Long-Term Equity Based Incentive Compensation

In 2014, we made awards of long-term incentive compensation to our Named Executive Officers at the Vice President level, Messrs. Dalrymple, Borrelli and Carr, were based on individual performance goals for each particular Named Executive Officer reflecting his primary area of responsibility (as discussed in the second paragraph of the Compensation Discussion and

Analysis above). As described above, each of Messrs. Dalrymple, Borrelli and Carr was assigned a target bonus opportunity as a percentage of salary, with maximum incentive opportunities equal to 150% of target awards. At its meeting on February 23, 2012, the Compensation Committee evaluated the President’s recommendations regarding the individual performance of each of Messrs. Dalrymple, Borrelli and Carr. Following such evaluation, the Compensation Committee authorized individual payouts of 2011 awards under the 2010 MIP to Messrs. Dalrymple, Borrelli and Carr. Awards to Messrs. Dalrymple, Borrelli and Carr for 2011 under the 2010 MIP were not intended to be qualifying awards for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.

Annual cash incentives for 2012 under the 2010 MIP will be paid pursuant to target awards established by the Compensation Committee for the Named Executive Officers in January 2012.

Long-Term Equity Based Incentive Compensation

2011 Awards

We pay long-term incentive compensation to the Named Executive Officers under our 2002 LTIP and 2007 LTIP, and we intend to continue to pay long-term incentive compensation under our 2012 LTIP, if it is approved by stockholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting. The provisions of the 2007 LTIP are essentially the same as the provisions of the 2002 LTIP and the provisions of the 2012 LTIP being submitted to stockholders for approval at the 2012 Annual Meeting are essentially the same as the provisions of the 2007 LTIP. The 2002 LTIP expired on December 31, 2006 and in December 2006, the Board adopted the 2007 LTIP which was approved by our stockholders at the 2007 Annual Meeting. The 2007 LTIP will expire by its terms at the 2012 Annual Meeting and we have submitted the 2012 LTIP for stockholder approval at the 2012 Annual Meeting. Historically, long-term incentive awards have been made primarily in the form of performance shares and, in a fewcertain cases, performance-basedshares of restricted stock and have been structured in a mannerrestricted stock units. Awards of performance shares under the 2012 LTIP are intended to qualify as performance-based for purposesprovide a pay-for-performance component of Section 162(m)compensation based upon the achievement of longer-term financial objectives focused on growth in book value per share. Awards of restricted

-47-


stock or restricted stock units under the Internal Revenue Code2012 LTIP are intended to provide a retention component of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). compensation, the value of which is tied to the market price of our common stock.

Performance Shares

For the 2011-20142014-2017 award period, the Compensation Committee based the number of performance shares awarded to theeach Named Executive OfficersOfficer upon a percentage of such executive officer’s 20112014 salary divided by the average closing priceprices of our common stock for the 30-day period prior to the mailing of material for the meeting of the Compensation Committee at which such awards were made. Such percentages of 20112014 salary were 200% for Mr. Hicks, 120% for Mr. Gorham and 60% for each of Messrs. Dalrymple, Borrelli and Carr. Mr. Hart did not participate in the 2011-2014 long-term incentive program due to his pending retirement. as follows:

    2014 Salary   Opportunity %   Opportunity $  

Mr. Hicks

  $1,000,000     400    $4,000,000  

Mr. Brandon

   800,000     300     2,400,000  

Mr. Dalrymple

   600,000     100     600,000  

Mr. Gorham

   600,000     40     240,000  

Mr. Sennott

   600,000     100     600,000  
      

 

 

 

Total 2014 Performance Share Opportunities

  

  $7,840,000  
      

 

 

 

The differing target awards as a percentage of salary reflect the Compensation Committee’s determinations of

appropriate levels and mix of compensation components, taking into account competitive considerations, varying levels of responsibility within Alleghany, internal comparability and the implicit impact of the various Named Executive Officer levelsOfficers on the accomplishment of our financial, strategic and operational objectives.objectives and competitive considerations. With respect to Mr. Hicks in particular, his 2014 performance share award reflected the Compensation Committee’s determination to further tie Mr. Hicks’ compensation to Alleghany’s financial performance and its views of the challenge of meeting the financial performance goals for the 2014-2017 award period in light of the current interest rate environment and (re)insurance market environment. The Compensation Committee had, in general, determined that increasing Mr. Hicks’ percentage opportunity for annual performance share awards was preferable for long-term retention purposes to the making of a significant one-time special equity-based award. For 2015 performance share awards, the opportunities for each of our Named Executive Officers, expressed as a percentage of salary, were the same as those set forth above for 2014.

Long-term incentive awards under the 2002 LTIP and 2007 LTIP (and future awards that may be made under the 2012 LTIP, if approved by stockholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting), includingIn making performance share awards for the award2014-2017 period, beginning January 1, 2011, are intended to promote accomplishment of our stated principalthe Compensation Committee took account of:

Alleghany’s financial objective to grow Alleghany’sof increasing book value per share at rates of common stock at double digit rates7-10% over the long-termlong term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and without taking risks that we do not deem prudent. Although our long-term goal is double digit growth in book value, the Compensation Committee seeks to incentivize achievement of performance goals that are realistic under prevailing conditions and avoid incenting excess risk.imprudent risks;

In making awards for the 2011-2014 period, the Compensation Committee at its meeting on January 18, 2011 took account of such stated financial objective and

prevailing financial and economic conditions and uncertainties and

the alignment of performance goals with Alleghany’s near-term strategy, with a particular emphasis on avoiding excess risk and maintaining Alleghany’s financial strength.

Taking into account such conditions, Alleghany’s strategy, the prevailing 10-year U.S. Treasury rates and prevailing equity risk premiums adjusted for Alleghany’s estimated stock volatility relative to the market, the Compensation Committee set the following performance goals for the 2011-2014 awards:2014-2017 period:

 

a maximum payoutpayouts at 150% of the value of one share of common stock on the payout date for average annual compound growth in our Book Value Per Share (as defined by the Compensation Committee pursuant to the 20072012 LTIP) of 8.5%9% or more over the four-year award period 2011-2014,ending December 31, 2017, as adjusted for stock dividends and as adjusted for performance relative to the S&P 500 Index (as discussed below);dividends;

 

-48-


target payouts at 100% of the value of one share of common stock on the payout date if such growth equals 6%7%, and payouts at 50% of the value of one share of common stock on the payout date if such growth equals 4.25%5%, payouts at 30% of the value of one share of common stock on the payout date if such growth equals 3.5%,with payouts for growth between the foregoing levels to be determined by straight line interpolation;interpolation and

 

no payouts if such growth is less than 3.5%5%.

Restricted Stock Units

Provided thatIn 2014, long-term incentive opportunities for Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Sennott included 759 restricted stock units, representing awards set at 50% of their respective base salaries, which cliff-vest four years from date of grant. These grants of restricted stock units are intended to further align Mr. Dalrymple’s and Mr. Sennott’s interests with those of our stockholders, while incenting the average compound annual growthprudence desired in Book Value Per Share for the 2011-2014 period,their roles as adjusted for stock dividends, is positive, it will be adjusted to include the excess, if any, of such average annual compound growth over the Total Return on the S&P 500 Index (whether positive or negativeGeneral Counsel and as calculated by Bloomberg Finance) for such period. In setting the 2011-2014 performance share awards, the Compensation Committee considered that the awards should be appropriately adjusted for relative protection of stockholder value during periods of unusual financial market turmoil, maintenance of Alleghany’s financial strength and should avoid incenting excess risk taking. To the extent that the Total Return on the S&P 500 Index over a four-year period measures the U.S. earnings environment, growth in Alleghany’s Book Value Per Share at a greater rate may be considered a measure of Alleghany’s performanceChief Financial Officer in preserving stockholder value. Since performance share awards are capped and tied

Perquisites

Our general practice is to stock price, the Compensation Committee considered that the relative performance adjustment should not create any disconnect with Alleghany’s goal of increasing stockholder value.provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers. In this regard, the Compensation Committee considered that it has authority to exercise its negative discretion to reduce payouts in the event that it determines that the S&P 500 Index adjustment produces payouts inconsistent with Alleghany’s performance.

ACP Incentive Program

At a meeting on January 18, 2011, the Compensation Committee established the ACP Incentive Program pursuant to the 2010 MIP. The purpose of the ACP Incentive Program was to provide cash incentives to select officers of Alleghany and the investment personnel of our subsidiary Alleghany Capital Partners LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alleghany (“ACP”), the employees of which are responsible, under the supervision of Mr. Hicks, for group-wide equity investments of Alleghany and its subsidiaries. Pursuant to the ACP Incentive Program, a 2011 ACP Incentive Pool was created equal to 5% of the amount by which (a) the performance of a designated portfolio, with an aggregate value of approximately $1.5 billion, of public equities and cash investments held by Alleghany and its subsidiaries and managed by ACP exceeded (b) the performance that would have been achieved if the designated portfolio had a total return equal to the total return of the S&P 500, over the three-year period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013 (the “2011 ACP Incentive Pool”). Mr. Hicks was granted a 50% interest in the 2011 ACP Incentive Pool. Payouts in respect of the 2011 ACP Incentive Pool were subject to certain caps, including a cap of $1 million for interim payments in respect of calendar year 2011. No other2014, no Named Executive Officer participatedreceived more than $10,000 in the ACP Incentive Program.

At a meeting held on January 17, 2012, the Compensation Committee determined to discontinue the ACP Incentive Program and to make interim pro rata payments to the

participants in the 2011 ACP Incentive Pool based upon performance through December 31, 2011. At its meeting on February 23, 2012, the Compensation Committee determined that, based upon performance through December 31, 2011, the maximum interim payment of $1 million for calendar year 2011 had been achieved. No further payments will be made in respect of the 2011 ACP Incentive Poolperquisites or under the ACP Incentive Program.

Compensation Policies and Practices Relating to Risk Management

Risk analysis has always been part of Alleghany’s review and design of its group-wide executive incentive plans and the Compensation Committee regularly monitors compensation policies, practices and outstanding awards to determine whether its risk management and incentive objectives are being met with respect to group-wide employee incentives. Alleghany’s material risks include investment risk (debt and equity), as well as catastrophe losses and material mispricing of risk at Alleghany’s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries. The Board’s and management’s risk oversight is discussed on page 4. The Compensation Committee does not believe that risks arising from Alleghany’s group-wide compensation policies and practices for its employees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Alleghany. As discussed above, Alleghany’s annual incentives and performance shares are capped and are not intended to incent excess risk taking to achieve outsized payouts. The managements of Alleghany’s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are incented to write profitable business and have no incentives to grow premium volume by underpricing risk. The Compensation Committee seeks to set realistic incentive goals, monitors them in light of economic conditions and Alleghany’s strategy and risk tolerance and will consider appropriate adjustments in respect thereof in the event of any conflict between incentives and the Board’s strategy and risk tolerance.

Retirement Plan

We offer retirement plan benefits to all our employees. Retirement benefits for our Named Executive Officers are provided under the Retirement Plan. We believe the Retirement Plan provides a competitive advantage in helping Alleghany attract senior “mid-career” level talent. In addition, the benefits offered by the Retirement Plan provide an important stable component of total compensation. Under the Retirement Plan, a participant must have completed five years of service with Alleghany or a subsidiary of Alleghany before he or she is vested in, and thus has a right to receive, any retirement benefits following his or her termination of employment. Prior to January 1, 2011, the annual retirement benefit under the Retirement Plan, if paid in the form of a joint and survivor life annuity to a married participant who retires on reaching age 65 with 15 or more years of service, was equal to 67% of the participant’s highest average annual base

salary and annual cash bonus over a consecutive three-year period during the last ten years or, if shorter, the full calendar years of employment. On December 13, 2010, pursuant to authority delegated by the Board, the Compensation Committee amended the Retirement Plan, effective January 1, 2011, by eliminating the inclusion of annual cash bonuses earned for years subsequent to 2010 in the computation of benefits. As amended, the annual retirement benefit would be the greater of (a) the retirement benefit accrued by the participant at December 31, 2010, based upon eligibility for vesting and years of service credited at such date, pursuant to the benefit formula in effect at December 31, 2010, or (b) a full service retirement benefit, if paid in the form of a joint and survivor annuity to a married participant who retires on reaching age 65 with 15 or more years of service, equal to 67% of the participant’s highest average annual base salary over a consecutive three-year period during the last ten years or, if shorter, the full calendar years of employment. Long-term incentives are not taken into account in computing retirementother personal benefits.

Deferred Compensation Plan

Alleghany creditsWe credit an amount equal to 15% of a Named Executive Officer’s base salary to the Deferred Compensation Plan each year. Entitlement to this savings benefit is not based on performance. As it is Alleghany’sour intention that a significant portion of compensation for our Named Executive Officers be contingent on performance objectives, the savings benefit offered by the Deferred Compensation Plan provides a stable component of total compensation. In addition, the Deferred Compensation Plan permits our Named Executive Officers to elect to defer the receipt, and thus the taxation, of all or part of their base salary and their annual cash bonus. A participant may choose to have savings benefit credit amounts and deferred salary and bonus amounts either credited with interest, or treated as though invested in our common stock or commencing January 1, 2011, a participant may also elect to have savings benefit credit amounts and deferred salary and bonus amount increased or decreased by an amount proportionate to the growth or decline in our stockholders’ equity per share.

Retirement Plan

Retirement benefits for our Named Executive Officers are provided under the Retirement Plan. Under the Retirement Plan, a participant must have completed five years of service with Alleghany or a subsidiary of Alleghany before he or she is vested in, and thus has a right to receive, any retirement benefits following his or her termination of employment. Completion of fifteen years of service is required in order to receive a full benefit under the Retirement Plan. Effective December 31, 2013, the Retirement Plan was closed to new participants and no additional benefits for existing participants will accrue after such date. Any participant who was not vested in his or her accrued benefit as of December 31, 2013 will continue to have future service with Alleghany credited toward the Retirement Plan’s five-year vesting requirement.

Financial Statement Restatements

It is our Board’s policy that the Compensation Committee will, to the extent permitted by governing law, have the sole and absolute authority to make retroactive adjustments to any cash or equity basedequity-based incentive compensation awarded or paid to any of our officers where the award or payment was predicated upon the achievement of

-49-


performance measuresgoals that were subsequently the subject of a restatementrestated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would reduce the size of any such award or payment. In this regard, the Compensation Committee is

authorized to have Alleghany seek to recover any amount the Compensation Committee determines was inappropriately received by any officer.

Hedging and Pledging Policies

We maintain a policy on insider trading and compliance that prohibits our officers from directly or indirectly purchasing or using financial instruments that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Alleghany securities they own. In addition, under such policy, officers are prohibited from pledging Alleghany securities as collateral.

Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines

We expect our executive officers to achieve ownership of our common stock having an aggregate value (based upon the higher of market value or book value) equal to a multiple of base salary, as follows: for our President and chief executive officer, the multiple is five times base salary; for our Executive Vice President, the multiple is four times base salary; for our Senior Vice Presidents, the multiple is three times base salary; and for our Vice Presidents, the multiple is one times base salary. We expect our executive officers to retain 75% of the shares of common stock they receive (net of taxes) in respect of awardsawarded under our long-term incentive plans until they achieve their applicable ownership levels, and they are expected to maintain such levels thereafter.

Tax Considerations

We are not allowed a deduction under Section 162(m) of the Code for any compensation paid to a “covered employee” in excess of $1.0 million per year, subject to certain exceptions. In general, “covered employees” include our President and chief executive officer and our three other most highly compensated executive officers (not including our chief financial officer) who are in our employ and are officers at the end of the tax year. Among other exceptions, the deduction limit does not apply to compensation that meets the specified requirements under Section 162(m) of the Code for “performance-based compensation.” In general, those requirements include the establishment of objective performance goals for the payment of such compensation by a committee of the board of directors composed solely of two or more outside directors, stockholder approval of the material terms of such compensation prior to payment, and certification by the committee that the performance goals have been achieved prior to the payment of such compensation. Such requirements permit the committee administering the plan to make discretionary adjustments to performance goals that would reduce payouts but do not permit discretionary adjustments to performance goals that would increase payouts.

Although theThe Compensation Committee believes that establishing appropriate compensation arrangements to retain and incentivizeincent our executive officers best serves our interests and the interests of our stockholders,stockholders. In order to maintain flexibility to compensate our executive officers in a manner designed to promote long-term corporate goals and objectives, the Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy that all executive compensation must be deductible. However, the Compensation Committee also believes that, when appropriate, consideration should be given to seeking to maximize the deductibility of the compensation paid to our executive officers.

The 2010 MIP permits the Compensation Committee to grant awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code, (“qualifying awards”)or “qualifying awards,” and awards that are not intended to qualify as “performance-based” compensation, (“non-qualifying awards”).or “non-qualifying awards.” Consistent with the 2010 MIP and the Compensation Committee’s consideration and balancing of its executive compensation objectives, the amounts identified under the Stock Awards and Non-Equity Incentive Plan columncolumns of the Summary Compensation Table on page 6652 paid to Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple and Gorham for 2011

-50-


2014 and 2013 and to Messrs. Hicks, Brandon and Dalrymple for all Named Executive Officers for 2010 and 20092012 are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.Code, except for the restricted stock units awarded to Mr. Dalrymple in 2014 and 2013 and to Mr. Brandon in 2012. The amounts reflected in such column for Messrs. Dalrymple, Borrelli and Carr for 2011, as well as the cash bonusesbonus paid to Mr. BorrelliSennott for 2011 and to Mr. Dalrymple for 20102013 identified under the Bonus columnColumn of the Summary Compensation Table dodoes not qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m). All ofMr. Sennott’s compensation reflected in the performance shares awardedSummary Compensation Table for 2014 and 2013 and Mr. Gorham’s compensation reflected in the Summary Compensation Table for 2012 do not have to the Named Executive Officers,qualify as well as restricted stock awards to such officers, under the 2002 LTIP and the 2007 LTIP (and any future awards that may be made under the 2012 LTIP, if approved by stockholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting) are intended to quality as “performance-based” compensation“performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m). of the Code because a person serving as our chief financial officer at the end of a given year is not a “covered” employee for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code for such year.

PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENTCompensation Policies and Practices Relating to Risk Management

CertainRisk analysis has always been part of our Named Executive Officers would be entitled to payments in the eventdesign and review of the termination of their employment. These payments, other than those that do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of the Named Executive Officers and that are generally available to all salaried employees, are described below.

Pursuant to his employment agreement with Alleghany, Mr. Hicks would be entitled to receive continued payments of his base salary until such payments aggregate $1.0 million on a gross basis, payable in accordance with our normal payroll and procedures, following termination of his employment other than for Cause or in the event of his death or Total Disability. As described in more detail on pages 70 through 73, the restricted stock award agreements with Messrs. Hicks and Gorham provide for pro rata payments in the event of termination of employment other than termination for Cause or Total Disability, if certain performance conditions have been met,group-wide executive incentive plans, and the restricted stock unit matching grant award agreementCompensation Committee regularly monitors compensation policies, practices and outstanding awards to determine whether our risk management and incentive objectives are being met with Mr. Hicks provides for a pro rata payment in the event of the termination of employment without Cause or termination of employment by reason of Mr. Hicks’s death or Total Disability. The foregoing agreements generally define “Cause”respect to mean conviction of a felony; willful failure to implement reasonable directives of the Chairman or the Board of

Directors of Alleghany,group-wide employee incentives. Our material risks include investment risk (debt and equity), as well as the Presidentcatastrophe losses and material mispricing of risk at our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries. The Board’s and management’s risk oversight is discussed on pages 5 and 6. The Compensation Committee does not believe that risks arising from our group-wide compensation policies and practices for our employees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Alleghany. In this regard, as discussed on pages 34 and 35, our short and long-term incentive plans are capped at individual levels so as not to incent imprudent risk taking to achieve outsized payouts. In addition, our officers are required to own a substantial amount of common stock to ensure that they maintain a significant stake in Mr. Gorham’s case, after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof; or gross misconductour long-term success, and we have in connection with the performance of any of their duties. “Total Disability” in the foregoing agreements generally is defined to mean inability to discharge duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period.

Other than the foregoing, there are no individual arrangements that would provide paymentsplace a compensation clawback policy applicable to our Named Executive Officers upon termination other than for cause or in the event of death or disability.officers to further discourage imprudent risk taking. Further, we do not grant stock options to officers as we do not wish to reward or punish them for exogenous short-term market price movements. The managements of our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are incented to write profitable business and have any arrangements with our Named Executive Officers that would provide for payments upon a change of control of Alleghany or upon a change of control and subsequent termination of employment.

A number of the plans described in this proxy statement have provisions that may result in payments upon termination of employment under certain circumstances as described below. Awards under our 2002 LTIP and 2007 LTIP provide for the pro rata payment of outstanding awards in the event of the termination of employment priorno incentives to the end of the award period. With respect to awards under the 2002 LTIP and 2007 LTIP, the pro rata payment would be based on the elapsed portion of the award period prior to termination and average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share through the date of termination, as determinedgrow premium volume by the Compensation Committee. Awards that may be made under the 2012 LTIP, if approved by stockholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting, would be treated in the same manner.

Our 2010 MIP also provides that, in the event of a participant’s death or disability prior to the end of the award period for an outstanding award, the participant (or in the event of the participant’s death, the participant’s beneficiary) shall receive such portion of the award, if any, as determined by theunderpricing risk. The Compensation Committee seeks to set realistic incentive goals, monitors them in its sole discretion. If the employmentlight of a participant who has received a non-qualifying award is otherwise terminated during an award period, the Compensation Committee,economic conditions and our strategy and risk tolerance, and will consider appropriate adjustments in its sole discretion, may determine that the participant shall be entitled to receive all or any part of the outstanding award payable to such participant. If the employment of a participant who has received a qualifying award is otherwise terminated during an award period, the participant shall not be entitled to receive any payment for such award unless the performance goals applicable to such award are achieved and certified by the Compensation Committee, in which case the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine that the participant shall be entitled to receive all or any part of the qualifying award that would be payable to the participant upon the achievement of those performance goals.

Additional payments upon any termination of employment would be made under our Retirement Plan and Executive Retiree Health Plan, or “Post-Retirement Medical Plan,” as long as the employee is eligible to receive benefits under the Retirement Plan at the time of the termination of employment. Our Deferred Compensation Plan also provides for payments of a participant’s vested savings benefitrespect thereof in the event of any termination of employment inconflict between incentives and the form previously elected by a participant subject to the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, as applicable, or if no election has been made, in a lump sum. A termination of employment will not cause an enhanced payment or other benefit to be made under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Information with respect to the Retirement Plan is set forth on pages 76 through 78,Board’s strategy and information with respect to the Deferred Compensation Plan is set forth on pages 79 through 81.risk tolerance.

The table below provides information regarding the amounts that Messrs. Hicks, Gorham, Dalrymple, Borrelli and Carr would be eligible to receive upon any termination of employment by Alleghany other than for cause, if such termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2011:

 

  Severance
under
Employment
Agreement
  Payments
under
Restricted
Stock
Award
Agreements(2)
  Payments
under
Restricted
Stock
Unit Matching
Grant Award
(3)
  2002 and
2007 LTIP
(4)
  2011
MIP(5)
  Retirement
Plan(6)
  Deferred
Compensation
Plan(7)
  Post-
Retirement
Medical
Plan(8)
  Total 

Weston M. Hicks

 $1,000,000(1)  $7,469,217   $6,025,586   $3,824,960   $1,650,000   $6,151,488   $1,426,907   $282,756   $27,830,914  

Roger B. Gorham

     $1,023,751       $1,221,134   $536,250   $1,461,932   $603,137       $4,846,204  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

             $354,545   $370,500   $793,168   $427,629       $1,945,842  

Jerry G. Borrelli

             $404,274   $222,000   $551,277   $326,907       $1,504,458  

John Carr

             $314,902   $172,800       $204,635       $692,337  

(1)This amount would be paid by Alleghany in the form of continued payments of base salary.

(2)Reflects award amounts payable to Mr. Hicks under his 2004 restricted stock agreement and to Mr. Gorham under his 2004 restricted stock agreement if Messrs. Hicks or Gorham were terminated other than for Cause or Total Disability (as such terms are defined in such agreements) based on the elapsed portion of the award period prior to termination and the performance goal of average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share through the date of termination having been satisfied as of December 31, 2011. The terms of these agreements are described on pages 71 through 73.

(3)Reflects award amount payable to Mr. Hicks under his 2002 restricted stock unit matching grant award agreement if Mr. Hicks was terminated without Cause or by reason of his death or Total Disability (as such terms are defined in such matching agreement) on the basis of 10% of the restricted stock unit account for each full year of employment measured from October 7, 2002, or 90% as of December 31, 2011. The terms of this restricted stock unit matching agreement are described on pages 70 through 71.
-51-

(4)Reflects payment of all outstanding LTIP awards, including amounts paid in February 2012 for the award period ending December 31, 2011, based on the elapsed portion of the award period prior to termination and average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share through the date of termination, in accordance with the terms of the awards.

(5)Reflects annual incentive earned in respect of 2011 under the 2010 MIP. These amounts, earned in respect of 2011 performance, were paid to the Named Executive Officers in February 2012 as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 66 and as described on pages 53 through 55.

(6)Reflects payment of vested pension benefits, computed as of December 31, 2011, under the Retirement Plan to Messrs. Hicks, Gorham, Dalrymple and Borrelli. Mr. Carr was not vested in the Retirement Plan as of December 31, 2011. The determination of these pension benefits is described in more detail pages 76 through 78. This amount does not include retiree life insurance death benefit, equal to the highest annual salary of a participant prior to the date of retirement, payable to Messrs. Hicks, Gorham, Dalrymple and Borrelli. Mr. Carr was not vested in such retiree life insurance death benefit as of December 31, 2011.

(7)Reflects the aggregate vested account balance at December 31, 2011 of each Named Executive Officer’s savings benefit (consisting of Alleghany contributions and interest earned thereon) under the Deferred Compensation Plan.

(8)Reflects accumulated accrued benefit under our Post-Retirement Medical Plan for Mr. Hicks. Messrs. Gorham, Dalrymple, Borrelli and Carr were not eligible to receive benefits under this plan at such date. Under the Post-Retirement Medical Plan, Alleghany would pay two-thirds of coverage premium and the Named Executive Officer would pay one-third of the coverage premium. Alleghany may terminate the Post-Retirement Medical Plan at any time.

Arrangements with Mr. Hart

Mr. Hart retired as Senior Vice President – Law effective April 30, 2011. As a result of his retirement, Mr. Hart:

received a gross payout on November 2, 2011 of 4,235 performance shares, paid in cash of $1,387,274, in settlement of all of the outstanding performance shares awarded to him under the 2007 LTIP;

began receiving monthly payments of his accrued benefit under the Retirement Plan on November 30, 2011, of which $139,540 was paid in 2011;

began receiving annual payments of his accrued savings benefit under the Deferred Compensation Plan, of which $157,312 was paid on November 30, 2011; and

became eligible to participate in the Post-Retirement Medical Plan, which had an accumulated accrued benefit of $239,709 at December 31, 2011.

Following Mr. Hart’s retirement from Alleghany, he and Alleghany entered into a consulting arrangement covering the period from April 30, 2011 to December 31, 2011. Mr. Hart received cash compensation of $140,000 for the consulting services provided to Alleghany during this period.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information under this heading relates to the compensation of Alleghany’sour Named Executive Officers during 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009. Alleghany does not use stock options to compensate its employees, including its Named Executive Officers. As a result, all tables contained under this heading “Executive Compensation” omit columns pertaining to stock options.2012.

Summary Compensation Table

 

Name and

Principal Position

 Year  Salary  Bonus(1)  Stock
Awards(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(3)
  Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
  All Other
Compen-
sation((5)
  Total 

Weston M. Hicks,

  2011   $1,000,000       $2,006,415   $2,150,000   $1,922,260   $268,182   $7,346,857  

President and CEO

  2010   $1,000,000       $1,976,413   $1,650,000   $821,990   $188,066   $5,636,469  
  2009   $1,000,000    $1,894,548   $1,500,000   $1,065,643   $204,501   $5,664,692  

Roger B. Gorham,

  2011   $550,000       $662,151   $536,250   $359,561   $157,775   $2,265,737  

Senior Vice President —

  2010   $530,000       $628,431   $516,750   $462,259   $106,646   $2,244,086  

Finance and Investments

  2009   $530,000    $602,397   $477,000   $316,023   $111,589   $2,037,009  

and CFO

        

Christopher K. Dalrymple,

  2011   $380,000       $228,804   $370,500   $331,084   $123,238   $1,433,626  

Senior Vice President,

  2010   $320,000   $115,200   $189,766   $192,000   $161,760   $68,476   $1,047,202  

General Counsel

  2009   $300,000    $170,429   $180,000   $118,582   $68,806   $837,817  

and Secretary

        

Jerry G. Borrelli,

  2011   $370,000   $100,000   $222,662   $222,000   $218,112   $116,579   $1,249,353  

Vice President

  2010   $360,000       $213,419   $216,000   $140,727   $77,658   $1,007,804  

and CAO

  2009   $350,000    $198,834   $210,000   $122,570   $78,241   $959,645  

John Carr

  2011   $288,000       $173,523   $172,800   $98,881   $129,693   $862,897  

Vice President —

        

Tax Director

        

Robert M. Hart

  2011   $183,333                $219,762   $403,095  

Former Senior Vice

  2010   $550,000    $326,042   $536,250       $85,072   $1,497,364  

President — Law

  2009   $550,000    $625,174   $495,000   $197,927   $130,288   $1,998,389  

Name and

Principal Position

 Year  Salary  Bonus(1)  Stock
Awards(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(3)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
  All Other
Compensation(5)
  Total 

Weston M. Hicks

  2014   $1,000,000       $3,959,904   $2,500,000   $2,914,467   $168,675   $10,543,046  

President and chief

executive officer

  2013    1,250,000        3,983,966    2,000,000        213,759    7,447,725  
  2012    1,250,000        2,514,334    2,062,500    1,259,316    245,581    7,331,731  

Joseph P. Brandon

  2014    800,000        2,376,099    1,600,000    254,392    135,071    5,165,562  

Executive Vice President (6)

  2013    1,000,000        2,124,755    1,200,000    337,805    167,907    4,830,467  
  2012    821,970(7)       10,521,105    1,200,000    338,632    4,174,312    17,056,019  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  2014    600,000        890,402    600,000    702,363    100,232    2,892,997  

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel,

and Secretary

  2013    550,000        876,778    550,000    29,707    92,347    2,098,832  
  2012    450,000        543,192    438,750    229,931    119,780    1,781,653  
        

Roger B. Gorham

  2014    600,000        237,258    240,000    373,171    100,692    1,551,121  

Senior Vice President-

Head of Fixed

Income and Treasurer

  2013    600,000        233,642    220,000        101,542    1,155,184  
  2012    550,000        663,997    536,250    237,544    144,586    2,132,377  
        

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  2014    600,000        890,402    600,000        100,691    2,191,093  

Senior Vice President and chief

financial officer

  2013    389,583(8)  $180,000    1,357,448    550,000        65,971    2,543,002  

 

(1)Reflects (i) a cash bonus paid to Mr. Borrelli for 2011 in recognitionSennott upon commencement of his superior performance and increased workload in connectionemployment with Alleghany’s acquisition of Transatlantic and (ii) a cash bonus paid to Mr. Dalrymple for 2010 in recognition of his assumption of increased responsibilities in connection with Mr. Hart’s transition to retirement.Alleghany.

 

(2)

Represents the grant date fair value of performance shares granted to the Named Executive Officers listed below under the 20022007 LTIP and 2007 LITP, andthe 2012 LTIP, computed in accordance with ASC 718.

For information on the valuation assumptions used in these computations, see Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in the Form 10-K. The grant date fair value of such performance shares, assuming payouts at maximum, is as follows:

 

Name

  2011   2010   2009   2014   2013   2012 

Mr. Hicks

  $3,009,622    $2,964,619    $2,841,822    $5,939,856    $5,975,949    $3,771,502  

Mr. Brandon

   3,564,148     3,187,137     6,011,114  

Mr. Dalrymple

   890,597     876,423     814,788  

Mr. Gorham

  $993,226    $942,647    $903,595     355,887     350,463     995,995  

Mr. Dalrymple

  $343,207    $284,649    $255,643  

Mr. Borrelli

  $333,993    $320,129    $298,251  

Mr. Carr

  $260,284    $249,168    $234,340  

Mr. Sennott

   890,597     2,036,173       

For Mr. Brandon, the 2012 amount represents the grant date fair value of (i) 12,403 performance shares granted to him under the 2007 LTIP for all outstanding award periods at the date of grant on March 6, 2012, with a grant date fair value of $6,011,114 assuming payouts at maximum, (ii) 11,137 shares of fully-vested, non-forfeitable restricted common stock awarded to him under the 2007 LTIP pursuant to a success shares award agreement (the terms of which are described in more detail on page 58), with a grant date fair value of $3,598,365, and (iii) 9,023 restricted stock units granted to him under the 2007 LTIP pursuant to a restricted stock unit matching agreement (the terms of which are described in more detail on page 58), with a grant date fair value of $2,915,331.

For Mr. Dalrymple, the 2014 amount includes the grant date fair value of $296,670 of 759 restricted stock units awarded to him under the 2012 LTIP and the 2013 amount includes the grant date fair value of $292,496 of 825 restricted stock units awarded to him under the 2012 LTIP.

-52-


For Mr. Sennott, the 2014 amount includes the grant date fair value of $296,670 of 759 restricted stock units awarded to him under the 2012 LTIP and the 2013 amount represents the grant to him on April 15, 2013 of 3,540 performance shares under the 2012 LTIP for all outstanding award periods having a grant date fair value of $2,036,173 assuming payouts at maximum.

 

(3)Represents cash incentive earned in respect of 2011 pursuant to awards under the 2010 MIP and in respect of 2010 and 2009 pursuant to awards under the 2005 MIP. For Mr. Hicks, this amount also includes his award for 2011 under the ACP Incentive Program.

 

(4)Reflects change in actuarial present value of pension benefits during 2014, 2013 and 2012. For Mr. Sennott, reflects that he is not a participant in the Retirement Plan. The actual change in pension value during 2011, 2010was negative in 2013 for Mr. Hicks and 2009.Mr. Gorham. However, SEC regulations do not allow for inclusion of negative pension amounts in the Summary Compensation Table. Change in actuarial present value of pension benefits is subject to many external variables, such as interest rates, that are not related to Alleghany performance. Therefore, we do not believe a year-over-year change in actuarial pension value is helpful in evaluating compensation for comparative purposes, and believe that stockholders may find the detailed explanation of changes in actuarial pension value for Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple and Gorham under “Change in Pension Value” on pages 56 and 57 and the discussion of accumulated pension benefits under “Pension Benefits” on pages 63 and 64 to be useful for an understanding of the pension benefits provided to the Named Executive Officers.

 

(5)All Other Compensation Amountsamounts reflect the following items:

 

Name

 Year Post-Retirement
Medical Plan(a)
 Life Insurance and
Long Term-
Disability(b)
 Tax
Reimbursement(c)
 Savings
Benefit(d)
 Consulting
Arrangement(e)
 Total  Year Post-Retirement
Medical Plan(a)
 Life Insurance and
Long-Term
Disability(b)
 Tax
Reimbursement(c)
 Savings
Benefit(d)
 Success Fee
Arrangement(e)
 Consulting
Arrangement(f)
 Total 

Weston M. Hicks

  2011   $98,526   $10,700   $8,956   $150,000       $268,182    2014       $8,500   $8,612   $151,563     $168,675  
 2010   $19,930   $10,620   $7,516   $150,000       $188,066  
 2009   $37,488   $9,820   $7,193   $150,000       $204,501  
  2013        14,320    11,939    187,500            213,759  
 2012   $35,218    13,320    11,105    185,938            245,581  

Joseph P. Brandon

  2014        7,220    6,601    121,250      135,071  
  2013        10,260    7,647    150,000            167,907  
  2012    146,033    6,437    4,797    117,045   $3,500,000   $400,000    4,174,312  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  2014        5,508    5,036    89,688      100,232  
  2013        6,000    4,472    81,875            92,347  
  2012    43,031    5,550    4,136    67,063            119,780  

Roger B. Gorham

  2011   $64,141   $6,440   $4,819   $82,375       $157,775    2014        6,108    5,584    90,000      101,692  
 2010   $16,398   $6,204   $4,544   $79,500       $106,646  
 2009   $21,598   $6,055   $4,436   $79,500       $111,589  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  2011   $57,459   $5,236   $3,918   $56,625       $123,238  
 2010   $12,098   $4,908   $3,595   $47,875       $68,476  
 2009   $15,532   $4,848   $3,551   $44,875       $68,806  

Jerry G. Borrelli

  2011   $51,784   $5,352   $4,005   $55,438       $116,579  
 2010   $14,694   $5,210   $3,816   $53,938       $77,658  
  2009   $16,836   $5,140   $3,765   $52,500       $78,241    2013        6,792    5,062    89,688            101,542  
  2012    50,539    6,616    4,931    82,500            144,586  

John Carr

  2011   $77,258   $5,311   $3,974   $43,150       $129,693  

Robert M. Hart

  2011   $33,509   $8,760   $6,555   $30,938   $140,000   $219,762  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  2014        5,748    5,255    89,688      100,691  
  2010   $(24,403 $15,570   $11,405   $82,500       $85,072    2013        6,286    4,685    55,000            65,971  
  2009   $22,566   $14,558   $10,664   $82,500       $130,288  

 

 (a)Amounts represent the change in Post-Retirement Medical Plan benefit value during each of the years presented. No amount is shown with respect to 2014 and 2013 as the Post-Retirement Medical Plan was terminated effective September 30, 2013.

 

 (b)

Amounts represent the dollar value of the insurance premiums paid by Alleghany for the benefit of such individuals for life insurance and long-term disability insurance maintained by Alleghany on their behalf in each of the years presented. These life

insurance policies provide a death benefit to each such officer if he is an employee at the time of his death equal to four times the amount of his annual salary at January 1 of the year of his death. These long-term disability insurance policies provide disability insurance coverage to each such officer in the event he becomes disabled (as defined in such policies) during his employment with Alleghany.

 

 (c)Amounts represent the reimbursement of taxes, and the reimbursement itself, on income imputed to such individuals pursuant to Alleghany’s life insurance and long-term disability policies as described above in each of the years presented.

 

-53-


 (d)Reflects savings benefitsbenefit amounts credited by Alleghany pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan in each of the years presented. The method for calculating earnings on the savings benefit amounts under the Deferred Compensation Plan is set out on pages 79 through 8161 and 62 in the narrative accompanying the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table.

 

 (e)Reflects the cash portion of a payout made to Mr. Brandon pursuant to a success shares award agreement (the terms of which are described in more detail on page 58).

(f)Reflects cash compensation received by Mr. HartBrandon for the consulting services provided to Alleghany from April 30, 2011January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2011March 6, 2012 pursuant to a consulting arrangement entered into with Alleghany.

(6)Mr. Brandon was named an Executive Vice President of Alleghany on March 6, 2012, upon the closing of the acquisition of TransRe. During the period from September 15, 2011 through the closing date, Mr. Brandon was engaged by Alleghany as a consultant.

(7)Represents pro rata portion of 2012 annual base salary of $1,000,000, reflecting Mr. Brandon’s commencement of employment with Alleghany in March 2012.

(8)Represents pro rata portion of 2013 annual base salary of $550,000, reflecting Mr. Sennott’s commencement of employment with Alleghany in April 2013.

-54-


Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20112014

 

Name

 Grant Date  Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
 All  Other
Stock
Awards:
Number  of
Shares of
Stock or
Units (#)
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards(3)
   Grant Date   Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
   

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)

   All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Share of
Stock or
Units (#)(3)
   Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards(4)
 
 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
    Threshold
(#)
   Target
(#)
   Maximum
(#)
   

Weston M. Hicks

  January 18, 2011   $880,000   $1,100,000   $1,650,000    1,999    6,664    9,995       $2,006,415     1/21/14    $2,500,000     5,066     10,131     15,196      $3,959,904  

Joseph P. Brandon

   1/21/14     1,600,000     3,039     6,079     9,118       2,376,099  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

   1/21/14     600,000     759     1,519     2,278       593,732  
  January 18, 2011       $500,000   $500,000                   ��     1/21/14             759     296,670  

Roger B. Gorham

  January 18, 2011   $286,000   $357,000   $536,250    660    2,199    3,299       $662,151     1/21/14     240,000     303     607     910       237,258  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  January 18, 2011   $197,600   $247,000   $370,500    228    760    1,140       $228,804  

Jerry G. Borrelli

  January 18, 2011   $118,400   $148,000   $222,000    222    740    1,109       $222,662  

John Carr

  January 18, 2011   $92,160   $115,200   $172,800    173    576    864       $173,523  

Robert M. Hart

                                    

John L. Sennott, Jr.

   1/21/14     600,000     759     1,519     2,278       593,732  
   1/21/14             759     296,670  

 

(1)

Reflects the target annual incentive opportunity granted on January 21, 2014 to each of Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Sennott. Payouts of such target amounts are subject to reduction to the extent that the aggregate amount of awards underto all of them exceeds the 2010 MIP. Under2014 Incentive Pool Amount and are also subject to decrease (but not increase) at the award opportunity in respectdiscretion of the 2011 Incentive Pool granted to Messrs. HicksCompensation Committee based upon its evaluation of Alleghany’s overall financial and Gorham, threshold amounts reflect estimated possible payout if Adjusted Earnings Per Share equal 81% of Target Plan Earnings Per Shareoperational performance and maximum amounts reflect estimated possible payout if Adjusted Earnings Per Share equal 110% of Target Plan Earnings Per Share. If Adjusted Earnings Per Share is 80% or below of Target Plan Earnings Per Share, no payment would be made. Under the award opportunity in respect of the 2011 ACP Incentive Pool granted to Mr. Hicks, the target and maximum amounts reflect his 50% interest in the 2011 ACP Incentive Pool

payable with respect to fiscal 2011. For Messrs. Dalrymple, Borrelli and Carr, threshold, target and maximum amounts reflect the range of awards that each such Named Executive Officer could have earned based upontheir individual performance.

 

(2)Reflects the gross number of shares of common stock payable in connection with awards of performance shares for the 2011-20142014-2017 award period granted under the 20072012 LTIP. Threshold amounts reflect estimated future payout of performance shares if average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share equals 3.5%5% in the award period; target amounts reflect estimated future payout of performance shares if average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share equals 6%7% in the award period; and maximum amounts reflect estimated future payout of performance shares if average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share equals or exceeds 8.5%9% in the award period (each as adjusted as described above).period. If average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share is less than 3.5%5%, none of these performance shares would be payable. The determination of average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share for purposes of determining payouts of these awards is subject to adjustment for stock dividends and, provided that the average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share for the 2011-2014 award period, as adjusted for stock dividends, is positive, will also be adjusted to include the excess, if any, of such average annual compound growth over the Total Return on the S&P 500 Index (whether positive or negative and as calculated by Bloomberg Finance) for such period.dividends.

 

(3)Reflects 2011 ASC 718the awards to each of Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Sennott under the 2012 LTIP of restricted stock units that cliff vest on the four-year anniversary of the grant date.

(4)Reflects the 2014 value of performance share awards for the 2011-20142014-2017 award period under the 20072012 LTIP as adjusted for stock dividends,the Named Executive Officer, computed in accordance with ASC 718, assuming payouts at target.target and shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units awarded to each of Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Sennott.

-55-


Narrative Discussion Relating to the Summary Compensation Table and

and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Change in Pension Value

Effective December 31, 2013, Alleghany’s Retirement Plan was closed to new participants and was “frozen” for existing participants so that no additional benefits would accrue after such date. Despite the freezing of the Retirement Plan, the Summary Compensation Table on page 52 may still show an increase or decrease in the value of our Named Executive Officers’ pension benefits. These changes in value are primarily driven by external variables, such as the discount rate, the mortality tables used and the passage of time. Set out below is a table showing the components of the change in pension value for years 2012-2014 for our Named Executive Officers who are participants in the Retirement Plan.

Name

  Year   (Increase)
Decrease in
Discount
Rate(1)
  Change in
Mortality
Table(2)
   Passage of
Time/Age
Increase(3)
   Value of
Benefits
Accrued
During the
Year(4)
   Total Change
in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(5)
 

Weston M. Hicks

   2014    $1,629,691   $862,795    $421,981         $2,914,467  
   2013     (1,618,668       386,857          (1,231,811
   2012     880,771         378,545          1,259,316  

Joseph P. Brandon

   2014     146,869    73,701     33,822          254,392  
   2013     (146,523       13,545    $470,783     337,805  
   2012     33,349              305,283     338,632  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

   2014     445,079    190,070     67,214          702,363  
   2013     (438,285    52,583     415,409     29,707  
   2012     181,122      48,809          229,931  

Roger B. Gorham

   2014     274,499         98,672          373,171  
   2013     (282,916       86,783          (196,133
   2012     150,602         86,942          237,544  

(1)For 2014, the discount rate used was 4%; for 2013, the discount rate used was 5%; and for 2012 the discount rate used was 4%.

(2)For the Retirement Plan years ending in 2013 and 2012, Alleghany elected to use a mortality assumption based on tables prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service for funding purposes. For the Retirement Plan year ending 2014, Alleghany elected to change the mortality assumption to the RP 2014 base table with Scale MP -2014, which reflect updated mortality tables issued by the Society of Actuaries in October 2014.

(3)Represents the change attributable to passage of time and increase in participant’s age.

(4)Amounts for each of Mr. Brandon and Mr. Dalrymple reflect additional accruals as their projected full service benefit in the applicable Retirement Plan year was greater than the retirement benefit accrued by him at December 13, 2010 when the Compensation Committee amended the Retirement Plan by eliminating the inclusion of annual cash bonuses earned for years subsequent to 2010 in the computation of benefits. For additional detail in this regard, see pages 63 and 64.

(5)Calculated in accordance with SEC rules governing preparation of the Summary Compensation Table on page 52 except for Mr. Hicks and Mr. Gorham in 2013 as SEC rules do not allow for inclusion of negative pension amounts in the Summary Compensation Table.

In order to show the effect that the year-over-year change in pension value had on total compensation, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 52, and as determined under applicable SEC rules, the table below presents SEC total compensation and then SEC total compensation without pension value

-56-


changes. The amounts reported in the SEC total without pension value changes are calculated by subtracting the change in pension value reported in the Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings columns (but including the nonqualified deferred compensation earnings reported in that column, if any) from the amounts reported in the SEC Total column. The amounts reported in this column may differ substantially from, and are not a substitute for, the amounts reported in the SEC Total column in the Summary Compensation Table on page 52.

Name

  Year   SEC Total
Compensation
   SEC Total
Compensation
without
Change in
Pension Value
 

Mr. Hicks

   2014    $10,543,046    $7,628,579  
   2013     7,447,725     7,447,225  
   2012     7,331,731     6,072,415  

Mr. Brandon

   2014     5,165,562     4,911,170  
   2013     4,830,467     4,492,662  
   2012     17,056,019     16,717,387  

Mr. Dalrymple

   2014     2,892,997     2,190,634  
   2013     2,098,832     2,069,125  
   2012     1,781,653     1,551,722  

Mr. Gorham

   2014     1,551,121     1,177,950  
   2013     1,155,184     1,155,184  
   2012     2,132,377     1,894,833  

Mr. Sennott

   2014     2,191,093     2,191,093  
   2013     2,543,002     2,543,002  

Employment Agreement with Weston M. Hicks

On October 7, 2002, Alleghany and Mr. Hicks entered into an employment agreement pursuant to which Mr. Hicks agreed to serve as Executive Vice President of Alleghany. Pursuant to the terms of this employment agreement:

agreement, Mr. Hicks’ salary is to be reviewed annually.

If In addition, if Mr. Hicks’ employment is terminated by Alleghany other than for “Cause” or other than in the case of his “Total Disability,” Alleghany will continue to pay his base salary in accordance with Alleghany’s regular payroll practices after such termination until such payments aggregate $1,000,000 on a gross basis. “Cause” is defined as conviction of a felony; willful failure to implement

reasonable directives of the Chairman or the Board of Alleghany after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof; or gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of Mr. Hicks’ duties; and “Total Disability” is defined as Mr. Hicks’ inability to discharge his duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period.

Mr. Hicks and Alleghany entered into a restricted stock unit matching grant agreement dated as of October 7, 2002, whereby Mr. Hicks received a restricted stock unit matching grant under the 2002 LTIP of two restricted stock units for every share of common stock Mr. Hicks purchased or received pursuant to stock dividends on those purchased shares, or “Owned Shares,” on or before September 30, 2003 up to a maximum of 30,000 restricted stock units in respect of up to a maximum of 15,000 Owned Shares (in each case subject to increase to reflect any stock dividend paid in 2003). Material terms of this matching grant agreement, or the “Matching Grant Agreement,” are discussed below.

Board after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof; or gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of Mr. Hicks received a second grant of 29,877 performance-based restricted shares of common stock (which includes shares received in subsequent stock dividends which are similarly restricted) under the 2002 LTIP uponHicks’ duties. “Total Disability” is defined as Mr. Hicks’ inability to discharge his election as chief executive officer of Alleghany. Material terms of this restricted stock agreement are discussed below.

duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period. The employment agreement was the result of an arm’s-length negotiation between the Executive Committee of the Board and Mr. Hicks and was approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board. The Executive Committee determined that such provisions were appropriate and helpful in recruiting Mr. Hicks, and the Compensation Committee and the Board approved such determination.

2002Employment Agreement with Joseph P. Brandon

On November 20, 2011, Alleghany and Mr. Brandon entered into an employment agreement which became effective on March 6, 2012 upon the closing of the TransRe acquisition, under which Mr. Brandon agreed to serve as Executive Vice President of Alleghany. Pursuant to the terms of this employment agreement:

Mr. Brandon’s salary is to be reviewed annually for increases but shall not be decreased.

If Mr. Brandon’s employment is terminated by Alleghany other than for “Cause” or other than in the case of his “Total Disability,” Alleghany will continue to pay his base salary in accordance with Alleghany’s

-57-


regular payroll practices after such termination until such payments aggregate $1,000,000 on a gross basis. “Cause” is defined as conviction of a felony; willful failure to implement reasonable directives of Alleghany’s chief executive officer after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof; or willful gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of Mr. Brandon’s duties. “Total Disability” is defined as Mr. Brandon’s inability to discharge his duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period.

Mr. Brandon and Alleghany entered into a restricted stock unit matching grant agreement dated as of March 6, 2012, whereby Mr. Brandon was to receive a restricted stock unit matching grant under the 2007 LTIP of one restricted stock unit for every share of common stock Mr. Brandon purchased or received pursuant to stock dividends on those purchased shares, or “JPB Owned Shares,” on or before September 3, 2012 up to a maximum of $5.0 million worth of common stock. Material terms of this matching grant agreement, or the “JPB Matching Grant Agreement,” are discussed below.

Mr. Brandon and Alleghany entered into a success shares award agreement dated as of March 6, 2012, pursuant to which Mr. Brandon received an award (i) under the 2007 LTIP of 11,137 fully vested and non-forfeitable shares of common stock and (ii) a lump sum cash payment in the amount of $3.5 million. These shares are subject to restrictions upon transfer until the earliest to occur of (i) March 6, 2015, (ii) Mr. Brandon’s termination of employment for any reason or (iii) a merger approved by the Board effectuated by a tender offer or other major corporate transaction approved by the Board with respect to Alleghany’s common stock.

The employment agreement was the result of an arm’s-length negotiation between the Board and Mr. Brandon and was approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board. The Board determined that such provisions were appropriate and helpful in recruiting Mr. Brandon and completing the TransRe acquisition.

2012 Restricted Stock Unit Matching Grant Award to Mr. HicksBrandon

On August 25, 2003,Between March 6, 2012 and September 3, 2012, Mr. HicksBrandon purchased 10,0009,023 shares of common stock and, pursuant to the JPB Matching Grant Agreement, Alleghany credited him with 23,4339,023 restricted stock units, as adjusted for stock dividends.

units. These restricted stock units are notional units of measurement denominated in shares of common stock and entitle Mr. HicksBrandon to payment on account of such restricted stock units in an amount equal to the Fair Market Value, as defined in the JPB Matching Grant Agreement, on the payment date of a number of shares of common stock equal to the number of restricted stock

units to which Mr. HicksBrandon is entitled to payment. All

Pursuant to the terms of the JPB Matching Grant Agreement, the restricted stock units vest over a seven-year period, with 15% of the restricted stock units vestvesting on October 7, 2012each of the first six anniversaries of the date of grant and 10% of the restricted stock units vesting on the seventh anniversary of the date of grant. The restricted stock units are to be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock, as the Compensation Committee may determine on the datewithin ten business days of the filing of Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K in respect of the year in which Mr. Hicks’ employment is terminated for any reason.applicable vesting date. If Mr. HicksBrandon is terminated without Cause or by reason of his death or Total Disability (as such terms are defined in the JPB Matching Grant Agreement) prior, the restricted stock units scheduled to October 7, 2012,vest during such year shall vest on a pro rata portionbasis for the amount of time Mr. Brandon was employed during such year. If Mr. Brandon voluntarily terminates his employment or Alleghany terminates his employment for Cause, all unvested restricted units shall be forfeited. Mr. Brandon has no voting or other rights in respect of the restricted stock units credited to him shall vest and become nonforfeitable on the basis of 10% of such account for each full year of employment with Alleghany measured from October 7, 2002.units.

Mr. HicksBrandon must maintain unencumbered beneficial ownership of the JPB Owned Shares continuously throughout the period commencing with the initial purchase of JPB Owned Shares and ending October 7, 2012on the earliest to occur of (i) March 6, 2019, (ii) Mr. Brandon’s termination of employment for any reason or (iii) a merger approved by the earlier date ofBoard effectuated by a pro rata payout.tender offer or other major corporate transaction approved by the Board with respect to Alleghany’s common stock. To the extent heMr. Brandon fails to do so, he will forfeit twoone restricted stock unitsunit for each JPB Owned Share with respect to which he has not maintained unencumbered beneficial ownership for the required period of time. If, prior to October 7, 2012,

-58-


Letter Agreement with Mr. Hicks voluntarily terminates his employment orGorham

Effective February 21, 2013, Mr. Gorham and Alleghany terminates Mr. Hicks’ employmententered into a letter agreement which provides for Cause, all of the restricted units shall be forfeited. Mr. Hicks may not transfer the restricted stock units and has no voting or other rights in respect of the restricted stock units.

2004 Restricted Stock Awardcontinued payments to Mr. Hicks

Upon his appointment as President and chief executive officer of Alleghany on December 31, 2004, Mr. Hicks received a restricted stock award of 29,877 shares of common stock (as adjusted for stock dividends paid since the dateGorham of his employment agreement) under the 2002 LTIP as set forthbase salary until such payments aggregate to $1.2 million on a gross basis, payable in a restricted stock award agreement dated asaccordance with Alleghany’s normal payroll and procedures, following termination of December 31, 2004 between Mr. Hicks and Alleghany. Such shares of restricted stock will vest:

(i) if Alleghany achieves average annual compound growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share (as defined in the award agreement) equal to 10% or more as measured over a calendar year period commencing January 1, 2005 and ending on December 31, 2008, 2009, 2010 or 2011; or

(ii) if the performance goal set forth in clause (i) above has not been achieved as of December 31, 2011, when Alleghany achieves average annual compound growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share equal to 7% or more as measured over a calendar year period commencing January 1, 2005 and ending on December 31, 2012, 2013 or 2014.

The performance goal set forth in clause (i) above was not met as of December 31, 2011.

If the performance goals are not achieved as of December 31, 2014, Mr. Hicks will forfeit all of the restricted shares. If Alleghany terminates Mr. Hicks’his employment other than for Cause or Total Disability (as defined in the award agreement), andevent of his death or Total Disability. “Cause” is defined as conviction of a felony, willful failure to implement reasonable directives of Alleghany’s chief executive officer after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof, or willful gross misconduct in connection with the performance goal set forth in clause (ii) above has been satisfied in all respects exceptof any of Mr. Gorham’s duties. “Total Disability” is defined as Mr. Gorham’s inability to discharge his duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for the passage of the period of time required under the new award agreement, that number of restricted shares equal to 29,877 multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of full calendar years beginning January 1, 2005 and ending on or before the date of such termination, and the denominator of which is ten, will vest.

2004 Restricted Stock Award to Mr. Gorham

In connection with commencing employment with Alleghany as Senior Vice President — Finance, Alleghany and Mr. Gorham entered into a restricted stock award agreement dated as of December 21, 2004. Under this award agreement, Mr. Gorham received a restricted stock award of 4,095 shares of common stock (which includes shares received in subsequent stock dividends which are similarly restricted) under the 2002 LTIP, which will vest:

(i) if Alleghany achieves average annual compound growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share (as defined in the award agreement) equal to 10%one or more as measured over a calendar year period commencing January 1, 2005 and ending on December 31, 2008, 2009, 2010 or 2011; or

(ii) if the performance goal set forth in clause (i) above has not been achieved as of December 31, 2011, when Alleghany achieves average annual compound growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share equal to 7% or more as measured over a calendar year period commencing January 1, 2005 and ending on December 31, 2012, 2013 or 2014.

The performance goal set forth in clause (i) above was not met as of December 31, 2011.

If the performance goals are not achieved as of December 31, 2014, Mr. Gorham will forfeit all of the restricted shares. If Mr. Gorham’s employment with Alleghany is terminated forperiods totaling six months during any reason prior to the occurrence of any vesting date, he shall forfeit his interest in any restricted shares that have not yet vested; however, if Alleghany terminates Mr. Gorham’s employment other than for Cause or Total Disability (as defined in the award agreement), and the performance goal set forth in clause (ii) above has been satisfied in all respects except for the passage of the required period of time, that number of restricted shares equal to 4,095 multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of full calendar years beginning January 1, 2005 and ending on or before the date of such termination, and the denominator of which is ten, will vest.consecutive twelve-month period.

-59-


Outstanding Equity Awards at 20112014 Fiscal Year-End

 

 Stock Awards  Stock Awards 

Name

 Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
 Market Value of
Shares  or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)
 Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested (#)
 Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested ($)
  Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
 Market Value of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)
 Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested (#)
 Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested ($)
 

Weston M. Hicks

          7,972(1)  $2,277,712            9,995(1)  $4,684,786  
          13,206(2)   6,189,520  
          16,656(3)   7,900,004  
          15,197(4)   7,122,448  

Joseph P. Brandon

          5,582(1)   2,615,993  
          7,442(2)   3,487,757  
  6,316(5)  $2,960,293    8,990(3)   4,213,289  
          9,119(4)   4,273,750  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

          1,140(1)   534,236  
          11,254(2)  $3,215,412            2,853(2)   1,337,173  
          11,475(3)  $3,278,548            2,472(3)   1,158,602  
          9,995(4)  $2,855,811    825(6)   292,496    2,279(4)   1,067,910  
          29,877(5)  $8,536,247    759(6)   296,670          
  23,433(6)  $6,695,096    

Roger B. Gorham

          2,535(1)  $724,138            3,299(1)   1,546,058  
          3,578(2)  $1,022,383            3,488(2)   1,634,556  
          3,649(3)  $1,042,465            989(3)   463,300  
          3,299(4)  $942,466            911(4)   426,742  
          4,095(7)  $1,170,001  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

          669(1)  $191,123  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

          1,062(1)   497,749  
          1,012(2)  $289,251            1,593(2)   746,623  
          1,102(3)  $314,791            2,214(3)   995,498  
          1,140(4)  $325,667            2,279(4)   1,067,910  

Jerry G. Borrelli

          813(1)  $232,411  
          1,181(2)  $337,459    759(6)   296,670          
          1,239(3)  $354,028  
          1,109(4)  $316,924  

John Carr

          622(1)  $177,670  
          928(2)  $265,146  
          964(3)  $275,553  
          864(4)  $246,982  

 

(1)Performance shares granted under the 20022007 LTIP (the 2012 LTIP for Mr. Sennott), calculated at maximum payout, pursuant to SEC requirements, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2011.

(2)Performance shares granted under the 2007 LTIP, calculated at maximum payout pursuant to SEC requirements, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2012.

(3)Performance shares granted under the 2007 LTIP, calculated at maximum payout pursuant to SEC requirements, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2013.

(4)Performance shares granted under the 2007 LTIP, calculated at maximum payout pursuant to SEC requirements, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2014.

 

(5)(2)

Restricted stock awardPerformance shares granted under the 20022007 LTIP (the 2012 LTIP for Mr. Sennott), calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2015.

(3)Performance shares granted under the 2007 LTIP (the 2012 LTIP for Mr. Sennott), calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2016.

(4)Performance Shares granted under the 2012 LTIP, calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2017.

(5)Restricted stock units granted under the 2007 LTIP which vests (i) after achievement of average annual compound growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share equal to 10% or more

vest over a calendarseven year period, commencingwith 15% vesting on January 1, 2005 and ending on December 31, 2008, 2009, 2010 or 2011 or (ii) if such performance goal has not been achieved as of December 31, 2011, after achievement of average annual compound growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share equal to 7% or more as measured over a calendar year period commencing on January 1, 2005 and ending on December 31, 2012, 2013 or 2014. The performance goal set forth in clause (i) above was not met as of December 31, 2011. If the performance goals are not achieved as of December 31, 2014, alleach of the restricted stock will be forfeited. If Alleghany terminates Mr. Hicks’ employment other than for Cause or Total Disability,first six anniversaries of date of grant and 10% vesting on the 7% performance goal has been satisfied in all respects except for the passageseventh anniversary of the period of time required under the new award agreement, that number of restricted shares equal to 29,877 multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of full calendar years beginning January 1, 2005 and ending on or before the date of such termination, and the denominatorgrant. The terms of which is ten, will vest.this award are described in more detail on page 58.

 

(6)Restricted stock unitsunit awards granted under the 20022012 LTIP which cliff vest on October 7, 2012. As further described on page 70, if Mr. Hicks is terminated without Cause or by reasonthe fourth anniversary of his death or Total Disability prior to October 7, 2012, a pro rata portion of the restricted stock units credited to him shall vest and become nonforfeitable on the basis of 10% of such account for each full year of employment with Alleghany measured from October 7, 2002.

(7)Restricted stock award granted under the 2002 LTIP which vests (i) after achievement of average annual compound growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share equal to 10% or more over a calendar year period commencing on January 1, 2005 and ending on December 31, 2008, 2009, 2010 or 2011 or (ii) if such performance goal has not been achieved as of December 31, 2011, after achievement of average annual compound growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share equal to 7% or more as measured over a calendar year period commencing on January 1, 2005 and ending on December 31, 2012, 2013 or 2014. The performance goal set forth in clause (i) above was not met as of December 31, 2011. If Alleghany terminates Mr. Gorham’s employment other than for Cause or Total Disability, and the 7% performance goal has been satisfied in all respects except for the passage of the period of time required under the new award agreement, that number of restricted shares equal to 4,095 multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of full calendar years beginning January 1, 2005 and ending on or before the date of such termination, and the denominator of which is ten, will vest.grant.

-60-


20112014 Stock Vested

 

 Stock Awards(1)  Stock Awards(1) 

Name

 Number of Shares
Acquired  on Vesting
 Dollar Value
Realized on Vesting
  Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
 Dollar Value
Realized on Vesting
 

Weston M. Hicks

  7,051   $2,385,318    11,437   $4,350,517  

Joseph P. Brandon(2)

  5,074    1,997,592  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  1,101    417,422  

Roger B. Gorham

  2,159   $730,359    3,650    1,383,825  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  549   $185,724  

Jerry G. Borrelli

  677   $229,026  

John Carr

  485   $164,073  

Robert M. Hart(2)

  6,477   $2,145,731  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  531    201,318  

 

(1)ReflectsFor each of Mr. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Sennott, includes the gross amount of performance shares which vested upon certification of performance by the Compensation Committee on February 24, 201125, 2014 with respect to the award period ending December 31, 2010.2013. Payouts of such performance shares were made at 112.2%150% of target. Of theThe gross share amounts reported above, thenumber of performance shares vested, and the form of payment, were settledas follows: Mr. Hicks, 11,475 shares with a dollar value of $4,350,517 (paid in cash and inthe form of 5,069 shares of common stock as follows:and $2,428,707 in cash); Mr. Brandon, 3,721 shares with a dollar value of $1,410,743 (paid in cash); Mr. Dalrymple, 1,101 shares with a dollar value of $417,422 (paid in the form of 638 shares of common stock and $175,537 in cash); Mr. Gorham, 3,650 shares with a dollar value of $1,383,825 (paid in the form of 2,068 shares of common stock and $599,784 in cash) and Mr. Sennott, 531 shares with a dollar value of $201,318 (paid in the form of 334 shares of common stock and $74,689 in cash).

Name

 Net Share Portion
of  Award
  Cash Portion
of  Award
 

Weston M. Hicks

  0   $2,385,318  

Roger B. Gorham

  977   $399,865  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  350   $67,321  

Jerry G. Borrelli

  273   $136,671  

John Carr

  285   $67,659  

Robert M. Hart

  0   $758,457  

 

(2)Includes 1,353 restricted stock units which vested on September 2, 2014 pursuant to the gross payout made to Mr. HartJPB Matching Grant Agreement. The dollar value of such restricted stock units was $586,849 (paid in connection with his retirement from Alleghanythe form of 4,235 performance539 shares paidof common stock and $353,141 in cashcash). The terms of $1,387,274,this award are described in settlement of all of the outstanding performance shares awarded to him under the 2007 LTIP.more detail on page 58.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Name

  Executive
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year(1)
   Aggregate
Earnings
in Last
Fiscal Year
(2)
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions
  Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal  Year-End
 

Weston M. Hicks

  $ —    $151,563    $312,294    $(3,562 $2,526,937  

Joseph P. Brandon

        121,250     10,174     (2,850  396,768  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

        89,688     47,297     (2,108  774,193  

Roger B. Gorham

        90,000     90,152     (2,115  993,351  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

        89,688     15,306     (2,108  157,151  

(1)Such amounts are included as a component of “All Other Compensation” for 2013 set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 52 and discussed in Note (5) to the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)Amounts represent interest earned on amounts credited to savings benefit accounts during 2013. Such amounts are not included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 52 as these amounts are not considered to be above-market interest.

The Deferred Compensation Plan, which was established in January 1982 and amended in January 2011, provides for unfunded deferred compensation arrangements for Alleghany officers and certain other employees. The following descriptions of “Savings Benefit Provisions” and “Compensation Deferral Provisions” of the Deferred Compensation Plan generally apply to amounts that were earned and vested under the Deferred Compensation Plan after December 31, 2004. Amounts earned and vested before January 1, 2005, or the “Pre-409A Benefits,” are subject to less stringent requirements concerning the time of payment of benefits under the Deferred Compensation Plan, but the substantive provisions that apply to the Pre-409A Benefits are generally the same as described below.

-61-


Savings Benefit Provisions

All officers, including our Named Executive Officers, are eligible to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan on the date of election or appointment as an officer of Alleghany.

Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, each calendar quarter, we credit a book reserve account for each officer who is a participant at any time during such quarter with an amount equal to 3.75% of the officer’s base annual salary. This quarterly credit results in an annual credit of 15% of a participant’s base annual salary, which we refer to as the “Savings Benefit Credit.” Each participant may elect to have those amounts either credited with:

interest at the prime rate (the “Prime Rate Alternative”);

treated as though invested in common stock (the “Common Stock Alternative”); or

increased or decreased by an amount proportionate to the growth or decline of Alleghany stockholders’ equity per share (the “Stockholders’ Equity Alternative”).

In general, payment of these amounts is made or commences on the date elected by the participant, which may not be later than 12 months following termination of employment, either in a lump sum or in installments as elected by the participant.

If a participant chooses the Prime Rate Alternative, that interest is computed from the date the Savings Benefit Credit is credited until the date that the amount is distributed to the participant or the date that the participant elects the Common Stock Alternative or the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative. The “prime rate” for purposes of the Deferred Compensation Plan means the rate of interest announced by JPMorgan Chase Bank as its prime rate at the close of the last business day of each month, which rate is deemed to remain in effect through the last business day of the next month.

Amounts treated as invested in common stock reflect the investment experience which the account would have had if the amounts had been invested, without commissions or other transaction expenses, and held in whole or fractional shares of common stock during the deferral period. These amounts are adjusted as appropriate to reflect cash and stock dividends, stock splits, and other similar distributions or transactions which, from time to time, occur with respect to common stock. Dividends and other distributions are automatically credited at their cash value or the fair market value of any non-cash dividend or other distribution and are deemed to purchase common stock on the date of payment thereof. Common stock is deemed acquired, and is valued for purposes of payout or transfer, at a price per share equal to the mean between the high and low prices thereof on the applicable date on the NYSE Consolidated Tape. A participant’s ability to elect to have his or her Savings Benefit Credit amounts treated as invested (or not invested) in our common stock is subject to compliance with applicable securities laws.

With respect to 2014, Mr. Hicks elected the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative to apply to his Savings Benefit Credit; Mr. Brandon and Mr. Gorham elected to have the Prime Rate Alternative apply to their Savings Benefit Credit; Mr. Sennott elected the Common Stock Alternative to apply to his Savings Benefit Credit; and Mr. Dalrymple elected to have the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative apply to 50% of his Savings Benefit Credit and to have the Prime Rate Alternative apply to 50% of his Savings Benefit Credit.

Compensation Deferral Provisions

The Deferred Compensation Plan provides that participants may elect to defer all or part of their base salary and annual incentive compensation each year other than compensation that would be paid in the form of common stock. Thus, currently, no long-term incentive compensation payable pursuant to the 2007 LTIP or 2012 LTIP may be deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Amounts deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan are credited with interest at the prime rate, unless a participant elects the Common Stock Alternative or the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative. A participant’s decision to have deferred amounts treated as invested (or not invested) in common stock is also subject to compliance with applicable securities laws.

-62-


Pension Benefits

 

Name

 

Plan Name

 Number of
Years of
Credited
Service
 Present Value
of  Accumulated
Benefit(1)
 Payments
During
Last
Fiscal Year
  

Plan Name

 Number of
Years of
Credited
Service
 Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit(1)
 Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
 

Weston M. Hicks

 

Alleghany Corporation

Retirement Plan

  9   $8,412,110       Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan  12   $11,354,082      

Joseph P. Brandon

 Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan  3    930,829      

Christopher K. Dalrymple

 Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan  13    2,046,650      

Roger B. Gorham

 

Alleghany Corporation

Retirement Plan

  7   $1,932,038       Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan  10    2,346,620      

Christopher K. Dalrymple

 

Alleghany Corporation

Retirement Plan

  10   $1,084,649      

Jerry G. Borrelli

 

Alleghany Corporation

Retirement Plan

  5   $750,614      

John Carr

 

Alleghany Corporation

Retirement Plan

  4   $608,445    —    

Robert M. Hart

 

Alleghany Corporation

Retirement Plan

  22(2)  $2,948,744(3)  $139,540(4) 

John L. Sennott, Jr.

 Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan   ��        

 

(1)Reflects the estimated present value of the retirement benefit accumulated under the Retirement Plan as of December 31, 20112014 by the Named Executive Officers, based in part on (i) their years of service as of such date, as indicated in the table. The estimated present values are also based in part ontable, and (ii) the Named Executive Officers’ average compensation as of December 31, 20112014 as determined under the Retirement Plan, which was $2,425,000 for Mr. Hicks;Hicks, $1,000,000 for Mr. Brandon, $995,075 for Mr. Gorham; $473,600Gorham and $459,167 for Mr. Dalrymple; $549,400 for Mr. Borrelli and $425,800 for Mr. Carr.Dalrymple. The actuarial assumptions used to compute the present values are:are a discount rate of 4.50%4.00% for pre-retirement interest, a 30-year U.S. treasury rate of 4.00% for post-retirement interest and the 2012 IRS2015 Internal Revenue Service prescribed mortality tables for the current valuation year with separate tables for annuitants and non-annuitants.

 

(2)Includes five yearsMr. Sennott commenced employment on April 16, 2013. In light of service granted by the Boardexpected amendment to Mr. Hart in connection with the commencement of his employment with Alleghany. Maximum benefits under the Retirement Plan are attained upon 15 years of credited service.

(3)The present value ofwhich occurred in July 2013 and was effective December 31, 2013, the Board did not designate Mr. Hart’s accumulated benefit was reduced by $6,808,644, which represents the present value of an earlier payment made to him fromSennott as a participant in the Retirement Plan.

(4)Mr. Hart began receiving monthly payments of his accrued benefit under the Retirement Plan on November 30, 2011.

The Retirement Plan provides retirement benefits for our employees who are elected corporate officers and those who are designated as participants by the Board, including the

Named Executive Officers. The retirementOn July 16, 2013, the Board approved an amendment to the Retirement Plan effective December 31, 2013, whereby the Retirement Plan was closed to new participants and no additional benefit accruals would occur for existing participants after such date. Any participant who was not vested in his or her accrued benefit as of the freeze date will continue to have future service with Alleghany credited toward the Retirement Plan’s five-year vesting requirement.

Retirement benefits are paid, following termination of employment, in the form of an annuity for the joint lives of a participant and his or her spouse or, alternatively, actuarially equivalent forms of benefits, including a lump sum. Prior to January 1, 2011, the annual retirement benefit under the Retirement Plan, if paid in the form of a joint and survivor life annuity to a married participant who retires on reaching age 65 with 15 or more years of service, was equal to 67% of the participant’s highest average annual base salary and annual cash bonus over a consecutive three-year period during the last ten years or, if shorter, the full calendar years of employment. On December 13, 2010, pursuant to authority delegated by the Board, the Compensation Committee amended the Retirement Plan, effective January 1, 2011, by eliminating the inclusion of annual cash bonuses earned for years subsequent to 2010 in the computation of benefits. As amended, the annual retirement benefit would be the greater of (a)(i) the retirement benefit accrued by the participant at December 31, 2010, based upon eligibility for vesting and years of service credited at such date, pursuant to the benefit formula in effect at December 31, 2010, or (b)(ii) a full service retirement benefit, if paid in the form of a joint and survivor annuity to a married participant who retires on reaching age 65 with 15 or more years of service, equal to 67% of the participant’s highest average annual base salary over a consecutive three-year period during the last ten years or, if shorter, the full calendar years of employment. The retirement benefit payable to a participant who retires aton reaching age 65 with more than five but fewer than 15 years of service will equal the amount produced by the formula set forth in

-63-


clause (b)(ii) of the preceding sentence multiplied by a fraction the numerator of which is the number of the participant’s years of service and the denominator of which is 15, or, if greater, the retirement benefit accrued at December 31, 2010.

For some participants, including Mr. Hart, the retirement benefit produced under the formula described above is reduced by the actuarial equivalent of earlier benefit payments. For purposes of the formula, base salary is the amount that would be included in the salary column of the Summary Compensation Table for the relevant years. For computations involving years when annual cash bonuses are included in the formula for determining the amount of the retirement benefit, the cash bonus is the amount of the cash bonus earned under the 2005 MIP or predecessor plan or any other annual incentive bonus plan or discretionary annual award that would be included in either the Bonus or Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table as earned in respect of the relevant years. The Retirement Plan’s benefit formula contains a factor which will reduce a married participant’s benefit payments to the extent that a participant is older than his or her spouse.

If a participant becomes totally disabled prior to retirement, then for the period of total disability the participant is treated as earning annual base salary in an amount which is equal to his or her annual base salary at the time of disability, with such base salary amount adjusted

annually for inflation. Further, a participant’s period of disability will be treated as continued employment for all purposes under the Retirement Plan, including for purposes of determining his or her years of service.

A participant who has terminated employment may start to receive benefits under the Retirement Plan as early as age 55, but the benefit payable at that time will be reduced to reflect the commencement of benefit payments prior to Normal Retirement Age, which is defined as age 65 with 15 years of service. A participant who terminated employment with us after reaching age 55 and completing at least 20 years of service, or after reaching age 60 and completing at least 10 years of service, will have a smaller reduction (a reduction equal to 3% of his or her accrued benefit) than a participant who terminated employment prior to reaching such age or completing such number of years of service (a reduction equal to 6% of his or her accrued benefit), and therefore has a subsidized early retirement benefit. The benefit payable to a participant who retires after Normal Retirement Age is increased to the greater of (i) the benefit taking into account additional years of service, salary increases and (for years prior to 2011) bonuses paid through the actual date of retirement or (ii) the benefit that is actuarially equivalent to the lump sum that would have been payable at Normal Retirement Age, such lump sum increased with interest to reflect the passage of time since Normal Retirement Age. For all purposes of the Retirement Plan, a participant’s years of service are the number of years, including a fraction thereof, included in the period which starts on the date he or she becomes a participant, and which ends on the date his or her employment with us terminates (except for Mr. Hart, who was granted five additional years of service in connection with the commencement of his employment with us).terminates.

As of December 31, 2011,2014, Mr. Hicks was age 5558 and had 912 years of credited service, thus he could have retired and begun to receive a retirement benefit as of that date. As of December 31, 2011,2014, Messrs. Gorham, Dalrymple Borrelli and CarrGorham were under age 55, thus noneneither of them would have been eligible to receive a subsidized early retirement benefit if he had retired as of that date. If Messrs.Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Gorham Dalrymple, Borrelli and Carr had retired on December 31, 2011,2014, the present value of their retirement benefits assuming commencement at their earliest retirement dates and reflecting their benefit elections under Section 409A of the Code would have been $1,461,932 for Mr. Gorham, $793,168$1,017,858 for Mr. Dalrymple and $551,277$1,566,274 for Mr. Borrelli.Gorham. Mr. CarrBrandon would not have been entitled to any retirement benefit if he had retired as of December 31, 2011 since2014 because he would not have had 5five years of service. As noted above, in anticipation of the closing of the Retirement Plan to new participants effective December 31, 2013, the Board did not designate Mr. Sennott as a participant in the Retirement Plan.

-64-


Nonqualified Deferred CompensationPayments Upon Termination Of Employment

The table below provides information regarding the amounts that Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Sennott would be eligible to receive upon any termination of employment by Alleghany other than for “Cause,” if such termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2014:

Name

  Executive
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year(1)
   Aggregate
Earnings
in Last
Fiscal Year
(2)
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
(3)
  Aggregate
Balance at  Last
Fiscal Year End
 

Weston M. Hicks

  $    $150,000    $59,376    $(2,174 $1,424,733  

Roger B. Gorham

  $    $82,375    $17,349    $(1,194 $601,943  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  $    $56,625    $14,780    $(821 $426,808  

Jerry G. Borrelli

  $    $55,438    $46,681    $(805 $1,517,177(4) 

John Carr

  $43,150    $43,150    $10,322    $(1,252 $374,945(5) 

Robert M. Hart

  $    $30,938    $48,639    $(157,760 $1,423,143  

Name

 Severance
under
Employment
Agreement(1)
  Payments under
Restricted
Stock
Unit Matching
Grant Award(2)
  Acceleration
of Payment
of Awards
under

2007 and
2012 LTIP(3)
  Acceleration
of Payment
of Awards
under

2010
MIP(4)
  Retirement
Plan(5)
  Deferred
Compensation
Plan(6)
  Total 

Weston M. Hicks

 $1,000,000       $15,057,540   $2,500,000   $9,616,562   $2,526,937   $30,701,039  

Joseph P. Brandon

  1,000,000   $1,547,105    8,406,893    1,600,000        396,768    12,950,766  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

          2,383,394    600,000    1,385,073    774,193    5,142,660  

Roger B. Gorham

  1,200,000        1,822,442    240,000    1,692,485    993,351    5,948,278  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

          3,110,311    600,000        157,151    3,867,462  

 

(1)SuchThese amounts would be paid by Alleghany upon termination other than for Cause, death or Total Disability (as such terms are includeddefined in the respective employment agreements) in the form of continued payments of base salary in accordance with our normal payroll and procedures.

(2)Reflects award amount payable to Mr. Brandon under his restricted stock unit matching grant award agreement if Mr. Brandon was terminated without Cause or by reason of his death or Total Disability (as such terms are defined in such matching agreement). The terms of this restricted stock unit matching agreement are described on page 58.

(3)Reflects payment on a pro rata basis of all outstanding LTIP awards, including amounts paid in February 2014 for the award period ending December 31, 2013, based on the elapsed portion of the award period prior to termination and average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share through the date of termination, in accordance with the terms of the awards.

(4)Reflects annual incentive earned in respect of 2013 under the 2010 MIP. These amounts, earned in respect of 2013 performance, were paid to the Named Executive Officers in February 2014 as a component of “All Other Compensation” for 2011 set forthreported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 6652 and discussed in Note (5) to the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)Amounts represent interest earned on amounts credited to savings benefit accounts during 2011. Such amounts are not included in the Summary Compensation Tableas described on page 66 as these amounts are not considered to be above-market interest.

(3)Represents distribution for tax purposes and, for Mr. Hart, commencement of annual payments of his accrued savings benefit on November 30, 2011 in connection with his retirement from Alleghany.

(4)Of this amount, $1,191,075 consists of compensation earned by Mr. Borrelli that he elected to defer and $326,102 consists of contributions made by Alleghany to the savings benefit account of Mr. Borrelli.47.

 

(5)Of thisReflects payment of vested pension benefits, computed as of December 31, 2013, under the Retirement Plan to Messrs. Hicks, Dalrymple and Gorham. Mr. Brandon was not vested in the Retirement Plan as of December 31, 2012 and Mr. Sennott is not a participant in the Retirement Plan. The determination of these pension benefits is described in more detail on pages 63 and 64. This amount $171,562 consists of compensation earned by Mr. Carr that he elected to defer and $203,383 consists of contributions made by Alleghanydoes not include retiree life insurance death benefit, equal to the annual salary of a participant at the date of retirement, payable to our Named Executive Officers.

(6)Reflects the aggregate vested account balance at December 31, 2013 of each Named Executive Officer’s savings benefit account(consisting of Mr. Carr.Alleghany contributions and interest earned thereon) under the Deferred Compensation Plan.

Alleghany’s Deferred Compensation Plan, which was establishedCertain of our Named Executive Officers would be entitled to payments in January 1982 and amended in January 2011, provides for unfunded deferred compensation arrangements for Alleghany officers and certain other employees. The following descriptions of “Savings Benefit Provisions” and “Compensation Deferral Provisions”the event of the Deferred Compensation Plan generally apply to amountstermination of their employment. These payments, other than those that were earned and vested under the Deferred Compensation Plan after December 31, 2004. Amounts earned and vested before January 1, 2005,do not discriminate in scope, terms or the “Pre-409A Benefits,” are subject to less stringent requirements concerning the timeoperation in favor of payment of benefits

under the Deferred Compensation Plan, but the substantive provisions that apply to the Pre-409A Benefits are generally the same as described below.

Savings Benefit Provisions

All corporate officers, including the Named Executive Officers and that are generally available to all salaried employees, are described below.

Pursuant to their employment agreements with Alleghany, Mr. Hicks and Mr. Brandon would be entitled to receive continued payments of his base salary until such payments aggregate $1.0 million on a gross basis, payable in accordance with our normal payroll and procedures, following termination of his employment other than for Cause or in the event of his death or Total Disability. As described in more detail on page 58, the restricted stock unit matching grant award agreement with Mr. Brandon provides for a pro rata payment in the event of the termination of employment without Cause or termination of employment by reason of

-65-


Mr. Brandon’s death or Total Disability. In February 2013, Mr. Gorham and Alleghany entered into a letter agreement which provides for continued payments to Mr. Gorham of his base salary until such payments aggregate $1.2 million on a gross basis, payable in accordance with our normal payroll and procedures, following termination of his employment other than for Cause or in the event of his death or Total Disability. The foregoing agreements generally define “Cause” to mean conviction of a felony; willful failure to implement reasonable directives of the Chairman or the Board, as well as Alleghany’s chief executive officer in Mr. Brandon and Mr. Gorham’s cases, after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof; or gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of their duties. “Total Disability” in the foregoing agreements generally is defined to mean inability to discharge duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period.

Other than the foregoing, there are no individual arrangements that would provide payments to our Named Executive Officers upon termination other than for cause or in the event of death or disability. We do not have any arrangements with our Named Executive Officers that would provide for payments upon a change of control of Alleghany or upon a change of control and subsequent termination of employment; although Mr. Brandon’s restricted stock unit matching agreement does provide that his holding requirement for JPB Owned Shares will lapse upon a change of control.

A number of the plans described in this proxy statement have provisions that may result in payments upon termination of employment under certain circumstances as described below.

2007 and 2012 LTIP

Awards under our 2007 LTIP and 2012 LTIP provide for the pro rata payment of outstanding awards in the event of the termination of employment prior to the end of the award period. With respect to awards under the 2007 LTIP and 2012 LTIP, the pro rata payment would be based on the elapsed portion of the award period prior to termination and average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share through the December 31st immediately prior to date of termination, as determined by the Compensation Committee.

2010 MIP

Our 2010 MIP also provides that, in the event of a participant’s death or disability prior to the end of the award period for an outstanding award, the participant (or in the event of the participant’s death, the participant’s beneficiary) shall receive such portion of the award, if any, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion. If the employment of a participant who has received a qualifying award is otherwise terminated during an award period, the participant shall not be entitled to receive any payment for such award unless the performance goals applicable to such award are achieved and certified by the Compensation Committee, in which case the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine that the participant shall be entitled to receive all or any part of the qualifying award that would be payable to the participant upon the achievement of those performance goals.

Retirement Plan and Deferred Compensation Plan

Additional payments upon any termination of employment would be made under our Retirement Plan, as long as the employee is eligible to participate inreceive benefits under the Retirement Plan at the time of the termination of employment. Our Deferred Compensation Plan on the date of election or appointment.

Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, we credit a book reserve account in an amount equal to 3.75% of the base annual salary, excluding bonuses, commissions and severance pay, of each officer who is a participant at any time during such calendar quarter, resulting in an annual credit of 15%also provides for payments of a participant’s base annual salary, referred to asvested savings benefit in the “Savings Benefit Credit.” Each participant may elect to have those amounts either credited with interest at the prime rate (the “Prime Rate Alternative”) or treated as though invested in our common stock (the “Common Stock Alternative”). Effective January 1, 2011, each participant may also elect to have his or her Savings Benefit Credit amounts increased or decreased by an amount proportionate to the growth or declineevent of Alleghany stockholders’ equity per share (the “Stockholders’ Equity Alternative”). In general, payment of these amounts is made or commences on the date elected by the participant, which may not be later than 12 months followingany termination of employment eitherin the form previously elected by a participant subject to the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, as applicable, or if no election has been made, in a lump sum or in installments as elected by the participant.

If a participant chooses the Prime Rate Alternative, that interest is computed from the date the Savings Benefit Credit is credited until the date that the amount is distributed to the participant or the date that the participant elects the Common Stock Alternative or the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative. The “prime rate” for purposessum. Termination of the Deferred Compensation Plan means the rate of interest announced by JPMorgan Chase Bank as its prime rate at the close of the last business day of each month, which rate is deemed to remain in effect through the last business day of the next month. With respect to 2011, Mr. Hicks elected the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative to apply to his Savings Benefit Credit; each of Messrs. Gorham, Borrelli, Carr and Hart elected to have the Prime Rate Alternative apply to his Savings Benefit Credit; and Mr. Dalrymple elected to have the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative apply to 50% of his Savings Benefit Credit and to have the Prime Rate Alternative apply to 50% of his Savings Benefit Credit. With respect to 2012, Mr. Hicks elected the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative to apply to his Savings Benefit Credit; Mr. Gorham elected to have the Prime Rate Alternative apply to his Savings Benefit Credit; Messrs. Dalrymple and Carr elected to have the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative apply to 50% of their Savings Benefit Credit and to have the Prime Rate Alternative apply to 50% of their Savings Benefit Credit; and Mr. Borrelli elected to have the Stockholders’

Equity Alternative apply to 25% of his Savings Benefit Credit and to have the Prime Rate Alternative apply to 75% of his Savings Benefit.

Amounts treated as invested in our common stock reflect the investment experience which the account would have had if the amounts had been invested, without commissionsemployment will not cause an enhanced payment or other transaction expenses, and held in whole or fractional shares of common stock during the deferral period. These amounts are adjusted as appropriatebenefit to reflect cash and stock dividends, stock splits, and other similar distributions or transactions which, from time to time, occur with respect to common stock. Dividends and other distributions are automatically credited at their cash value or the fair market value of any non-cash dividend or other distribution and are deemed to purchase common stock on the date of payment thereof. Common stock is deemed acquired, and is valued for purposes of payout or transfer, at a price per share equal to the mean between the high and low prices thereof on the applicable date on the New York Stock Exchange Consolidated Tape. A participant’s ability to elect to have his or her Savings Benefit Credit amounts treated as invested (or not invested) in our common stock is subject to compliance with applicable securities laws.

Compensation Deferral Provisions

The Deferred Compensation Plan provides that participants may elect to defer all or part of their base salary and annual incentive compensation each year other than compensation that would be paid in the form of our common stock. Thus, currently, no long-term incentive compensation payable pursuant to the 2002 LTIP or 2007 LTIP may be deferredmade under the Deferred Compensation Plan. If the 2012 LTIP is approved by stockholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting, no long-term incentive compensation payable pursuantInformation with respect to the 2012 LTIP will be eligible for deferral under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Amounts deferred underRetirement Plan is set forth on pages 63 and 64, and information with respect to the Deferred Compensation Plan are credited with interest at the prime rate, unless a participant elects the Common Stock Alternative or the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative. A participant’s decision to have deferred amounts treated as invested (or not invested) in our common stock is also subject to compliance with applicable securities laws.set forth on pages 61 and 62.

-66-


STOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS AND PROPOSALS

Alleghany’s By-Laws, which are available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com, require that Alleghany be furnished with written notice with respect to:

 

the nomination of a person for election as a director, other than a person nominated by or at the direction of the Board,Board; and

 

the submission of a proposal, other than a proposal submitted by or at the direction of the Board, at a meeting of stockholders.

In order for any such nomination or submission to be proper, the notice must contain certain information concerning the nominating or proposing stockholder and the nominee or the proposal, as the case may be, and must be furnished to Alleghany generally not less than 30 days prior to the meeting. A copy of the applicable By-Law provisions may be obtained, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices.

In accordance with the rules of the SEC Rule 14a-8, in order for any proposal of a stockholder intended to be presented at Alleghany’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received by the Secretary of Alleghany by November 16, 2012 in order for the proposal to be considered for inclusion in Alleghany’s notice of meeting, proxy statement and proxy relating to the 20122016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, scheduled for Friday, April 26, 2013.

SHARED ADDRESS STOCKHOLDERS

In accordance with a notice sent to eligible stockholders who share a single address, we are sending only one annual report to stockholders and one proxy statement to that address unless we22, 2016, the proposal must be received instructions to the contrary from any stockholder at that address. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs. However, if a stockholder of record wishes to receive a separate annual report to stockholders and proxy statement in the future, a separate copy may be obtained, without charge, upon written or oral request to the office ofby the Secretary of Alleghany Corporation, 7 Times Square Tower, New York, New York, 10036, telephone number (212) 752-1356. Eligible stockholders of record who receive multiple copies of our annual report to stockholders and proxy statement can request householding by contacting us in the same manner. Stockholders who own shares through a bank, broker, or other nominee can request householding by contacting the nominee. We hereby undertake to deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the annual report to stockholders and proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered.November 17, 2015.

-67-


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

At any time prior to their being voted, proxies are revocable by written notice to the Secretary of Alleghany, submitting a new proper proxy dated later than the date of the revoked proxy, or by appearance at the 20122015 Annual Meeting and voting in person. A quorum comprising the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Alleghany’s common stock on the record date must be present in person or represented by proxy for the transaction of business at the 20122015 Annual Meeting.

Solicitation of proxies will be made by mail, courier, telephone, facsimile or e-mail and, to the extent necessary, by telegrams and personal interviews. Alleghany will bear the expenses in connection with the solicitation of proxies. Brokers, custodians and fiduciaries will be requested to transmit proxy material to the beneficial owners of common stock held of record by such persons at Alleghany’s expense. Alleghany has retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies, and for its services Alleghany expects to pay fees of approximately $9,500$9,000 plus expenses.

 

By order of the Board of Directors
CHRISTOPHER K. DALRYMPLE
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

March 16, 2012

-68-


EXHIBIT A

ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

2012 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE2015 DIRECTORS’ STOCK PLAN

1. PURPOSES OF THE PLAN.    The purposes of thePURPOSE. This Alleghany Corporation 2012 Long-Term Incentive2015 Directors’ Stock Plan (the “Plan”) are to furtherhas been adopted by the long-term growthBoard of Directors (the “Board”) of Alleghany Corporation (the “Corporation”“Company”),. The purpose of the Plan is to advance the benefitinterests of the Company and its stockholders by providing incentivesattracting and retaining highly qualified individuals to serve as members of the officers and otherBoard who are not employees of the Corporation andCompany or any of its subsidiaries, whoand to encourage them to increase their stock ownership in order to promote long-term stockholder value through ownership of the common stock, $1.00 par value, of the Company (“Common Stock”). The purpose of the Plan will be largely responsible for such growth,accomplished through the grant of shares of Common Stock subject to the potential forfeiture and restrictions on transfer in Section 4 (“Restricted Stock”) or notional units of measurement, each equivalent to assistone share of Common Stock (“Restricted Stock Units”) or any combination thereof pursuant to the Corporation in attracting and retaining executives of experience and ability on a basis competitive with industry practices. The Plan permits the Corporation to provide equity-based incentive compensation, payable in stock or cash, of the types commonly known as restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance units, phantom stock and stock options, as well as other types of equity-based incentive compensation.terms hereof.

2. ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN.ADMINISTRATION. The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee ofBoard or a duly appointed committee thereof. The Board shall have all the Board of Directors ofpowers vested in it by the Corporation (the “Committee”). Each member of the Committee shall be both an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3(b)(3)(i) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or successor rule or regulation. Subject to the provisionsterms of the Plan, such powers to include, without limitation, the Committee shall have exclusive powerauthority (within the limitations described herein) to select the employees to participate inconstrue the Plan, to determine the type, sizeall questions arising thereunder and, terms of awards to be made to each participant selected, and to determine the time or times when awards will be granted or paid. The Committee’s interpretation of the Plan or of any awards granted thereunder shall be final and binding on all parties concerned, including the Corporation and any participant. The Committee shall have authority, subject to the provisions of the Plan, to establish, adopt and reviseamend such rules and regulations guidelines, formsfor the administration of agreements and instruments relating to the Plan as it may deem necessary or advisable fordesirable. Any decision of the Board in the administration of the Plan.

3.        PARTICIPATION.    Participants in the Plan shall be selectedfinal and conclusive. The Board may authorize any one or more of its members or any officer of the Company to exercise the Board’s power over the day-to-day administration of the Plan, including executing and delivering documents on behalf of the Company.

3. ANNUAL EQUITY GRANTS. Each year, as of the first business day following the conclusion of the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”), each individual who was elected, reelected or continues as a member of the Board and who is not an employee of the Company or any subsidiary (a “Non-Employee Director”) shall automatically be granted either (x) such number of shares of Restricted Stock equal to $130,000 (or such higher amount as shall be determined by the CommitteeBoard from among the employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. The term “employee” shall mean any person (including any officer) employedtime to time) divided by the Corporation or a subsidiary on a salaried basis. The term “subsidiary” shall mean any corporation, partnership or limited liability company, a majority30-Day Average Value (as defined below) of the total combined voting power of whose stock or other equity interests is beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by the Corporation. Participants may receive multiple awards under the Plan.

4.         AWARDS.

(a)Types.    Awards available under the Plan may be paid in cash and/or shares of the Corporation’s common stock, $1.00 par value (“Common Stock”), and shall include, but not be limited to, grants of restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance units, phantom stock and options to purchase sharesone share of Common Stock (“Options”)on the grant date or (y) if elected by the Non-Employee Director in accordance with Section 5(a), including Options intendedsuch number of Restricted Stock Units equal to qualify$130,000 (or such higher amount as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Code, and Options not intended so to qualify. The Committee may also make an award in any other form deemed by it to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan.

(b)Certain Qualifying Awards.    The Committee, in its discretion, may grant an award to any participant who is or who becomes a “Covered Employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, with the intent that such award qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code (a “Qualifying Award”). The right to receive (or retain) a Qualifying Award (other than in the form of an Option or a stock appreciation right granted at Fair Market Value) shall be conditional upon the achievement of performance goals establisheddetermined by the Committee in writing at theBoard from time such award is granted or otherwise, but not later than the time period required by Section 162(m) of the Code so as to continue to be a Qualifying Award. Such performance goals, which may vary from participant to participant and award to award, may be expressed in terms of any, but not limited to, of the following business criteria: revenues, operating income, cash flow, management of expenses, loss reserves and loss adjustment expense reserves, underwriting expenses, underwriting profits, income before income taxes, net income, earnings per share, net worth, stockholders’ equity, investment performance, return on equity or assets or total return to stockholders, whether applicable to the Corporation or any relevant subsidiary or business unit or entity in which the Corporation has a significant investment, or any combination thereof as the Committee may deem appropriate. Prior to the payment of any Qualifying Award, the Committee shall certify in writing that the performance goals were satisfied.

(c)Time and Deferral of Payments.    At the time the Committee grants each award under the Plan, the Committee shall specify in writing the time of the payment of the award, which time may be a specific date or event, or the time of satisfaction of any performance goals or other condition imposedtime) divided by the Committee, provided that in the case30-Day Average Value of any award deemed to be deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Code, such payment date shall be a date when payment can be made under Section 409A without penalty. In awarding any right to receive cash and/or sharesone share of Common Stock on the Committeegrant date, subject to payment as provided in its discretion also may permitSection 5. “30-Day Average Value” shall mean, with respect to any date, the participantaverage of the closing sales prices of the Common Stock on the 30 consecutive trading days preceding the grant date as reported on the stock exchange or market on which the Common Stock is primarily traded. In the event that an individual is appointed as a member of the Board after an Annual Meeting and at such time is a Non-Employee Director (an “Appointed Director”), such Appointed Director shall automatically be granted Restricted Stock (or if elected by such Appointed Director as provided herein, Restricted Stock Units) as of the date he is appointed to electthe Board (the “Appointment Date”), as to receive all or a

portionthat number of such cash and/orwhole shares of CommonRestricted Stock at a later date in a manner consistent withor Restricted Stock Units (with any fractional share rounded up) as is equal to (a) the Section 409A rules. Deferrals shall be for such periods and upon such other terms asnumber of shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units that would have been granted pursuant to the Committee may determine to be appropriate, and shall be reflected in a written agreement in compliance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

(d)Vesting, Other Performance Requirements and Forfeiture. Receipt or payout of awards under the Plan, and the right to exercise Options, may be conditioned upon the fulfillment of specified conditions as established by the Committee in its discretion, including, without limitation, the completion of specified periods of service in the employ of the Corporation or its subsidiaries, and the achievement of specified business and/or personal performance goals, and the Committee may provide for the forfeiture of all or any portion of any such awards if these conditions are not satisfied and in such other specified circumstances as it deems appropriate. The Committee also may specify by whom and/or in what manner the accomplishment of any such performance goals shall be determined and may waive or modify any such performance goals or conditions, except where such waiver would cause anapplicable award that is a Qualifying Awardthe Appointed Director would have received had he been elected at the immediately preceding Annual Meeting (as such number was adjusted pursuant to ceaseSection 7 hereof since the immediately preceding Annual Meeting), times (b) the ratio which the number of days from the Appointment Date until the next Annual Meeting bears to meet the criteria to be a Qualifying Award.365.

(e)Agreements.    In the Committee’s discretion, any award4. RESTRICTED STOCK.

(a) Restricted Stock granted under the Plan shall be evidenced by an agreement atissued for no consideration, but the timeRestricted Stock shall be forfeited to the Company (without the payment of grantany consideration) if the Non-Employee Director resigns from the Board prior to the Next Annual Meeting. In the event that a Non-Employee Director previously granted Restricted Stock shall terminate service as a Non-Employee director due to

death or disability prior to the vesting thereof, the Board may in its sole discretion determine to vest such shares of Restricted Stock, in full or in part. In addition, Restricted Stock shall not be sold, assigned, pledged or transferred to any person until the third anniversary of the awarddate the Restricted Stock is granted or, thereafter, which,in the case of Restricted Stock granted to an Appointed Director upon his appointment, the third anniversary of the first business day that followed the Annual Meeting immediately preceding his appointment; provided that, in any case, the Restricted Stock shall automatically cease to be subject to the provisionsforegoing restrictions on sale, assignment, pledge or transfer upon the Non-Employee Director’s death prior to the Next Annual Meeting or, subsequent to the Next Annual Meeting, upon the date the Non-Employee Director ceases to be a director for any reason. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, upon a Change in Control of the Plan, may containCompany (as defined below), all restrictions on sale, assignment, pledge or transfer on shares of Restricted Stock (or shares that were previously Restricted Stock) shall lapse and be of no further force or effect.

(b) The Non-Employee Director to whom Restricted Stock is issued will have the customary rights of a stockholder with respect to such terms and conditions as may be required by the Committee, which agreement shall be executed by an officer on behalf of the Corporation; provided that, the terms of payment of any award that may be deemed deferred compensation for purposes of Section 409A of the Code, including any award or deferral arrangement described in Section 4(c) hereof, shall be evidenced by a written agreement.

5.        SHARES OF STOCK SUBJECT TO THE PLAN AND TO CERTAIN AWARDS.

Subject, in each case, to adjustment as provided in Section 7(a) hereof, (i) the number of shares of Common Stock, that may be paidincluding the right to participants undervote the Plan and/or purchased pursuant to Options granted under the Plan shall not exceed an aggregate of 600,000 shares, (ii) no more than 100,000 shares of the total number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance underand to receive dividends paid thereon. Prior to the Plan maydate the Restricted Stock ceases to be grantedsubject to the restrictions on sale, assignment, pledge or transfer in Section 4(a), dividends paid on such Common Stock in the form of incentive stock options, (iii)additional shares of Common Stock or as securities or other property shall be subject to the maximum numbersame risk of forfeiture and other restrictions as the underlying shares of Common Stock with respect to which Qualifying Awardsthe dividend was paid.

(c) Any Restricted Stock issued under the Plan may be evidenced in such manner as the Board in its sole discretion shall deem appropriate, including, without limitation, book-entry registration or by the issuance of a stock certificate or certificates. In the event any stock certificate is issued in respect of Restricted Stock, such certificate shall be registered in the name of the Non-Employee Director, and shall bear an appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock.

5. RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS.

(a) To elect to be granted Restricted Stock Units in lieu of the automatic grant of Restricted Stock, a Non-Employee Director must affirmatively elect (an “Election”) to receive such Restricted Stock Units on or before the December 31st preceding the Annual Meeting in respect of which the automatic grant of Restricted Stock would otherwise be made; provided, however, that (i) a Non-Employee Director who is newly elected as a director at an Annual Meeting may make his Election before the date of such Annual Meeting at which the Non-Employee Director was first elected as a director and (ii) an Appointed Director may make his Election with respect to (x) the grant of Restricted Stock to be received at the next Annual Meeting on or before the later of (A) the date of the meeting of the Board at which he was appointed as a director or (B) the December 31st preceding that next Annual Meeting, and (y) the Restricted Stock to be received upon his appointment as a director, on or before the date of the meeting of the Board at which he was appointed as a director. Each Election shall be irrevocable after the last date that such Election may be made. Each Election to receive Restricted Stock Units may also include an election specifying the date or dates and/or event or events for the payment in respect of such Restricted Stock Units (each such date or dates and/or event or events being referred to herein as a “Payment Date”); provided that any Payment Date elected may not specify a date or event for payment that is prior to the third anniversary of the date such Restricted Stock Units are granted or, in the case of Restricted Stock Units granted to any participant in anyan Appointed Director upon his appointment, prior to the third anniversary of the first business day that followed the Annual Meeting that immediately preceded his appointment (in either case, other than a Payment Date that provides for payment when the Non-Employee Director ceases to be a member of the Board). Each Payment Date: (i) specified as a calendar yeardate must be January 1st and (ii) specified as an event shall be 50,000 shares,deemed to be the January 1st coinciding with or next following the specified event. A Non-Employee Director’s Election may provide that such Election shall remain in effect until revoked (which revocation must be made on or before the December 31st preceding the Annual Meeting at which such revocation is to take effect) with respect to all subsequently granted Restricted Stock Units.

(b) The Company shall establish and (iv)maintain a separate unfunded, bookkeeping account to which the maximum number ofRestricted Stock Units granted to a Non-Employee Director shall be credited (an “Account”), which Account shall reflect the investment experience that the Account would have had if such Account held whole or fractional shares of Common Stock with respectequal to which Qualifying Awards may be grantedthe number of whole or fractional Restricted Stock Units credited to any participant in the form of Options (all of which may be issued as Options that qualify as incentive stock options) or stock appreciation

rights in any calendar yearAccount. A separate sub-Account shall be 10,000created to identify each grant of Restricted Stock Units for purposes of applying the provisions of the Plan. The Account (and each sub-Account) shall exist solely for record keeping purposes and shall not represent any actual interest in any shares of Common Stock. For purposesThe right of any Non-Employee Director to receive payments in respect of Restricted Stock Units shall be no greater than the right of any unsecured general creditor of the limitations set forth in this Section 5, awards based upon, or measured by, the value or changes in the value of shares of Common Stock (whether paid inCompany. If any cash or shares of Common Stock), any shares of Common Stock retained by the Corporation in satisfaction of the participant’s obligation for withholding taxes, and shares of Common Stock not issued as a result of a net exercise of an Option shall be treated as shares of Common Stockstock dividends are paid to participants. If any award shall be forfeited or otherwise terminates (in whole or in part), or if an Option shall expire or terminate unexercised,on the shares of Common Stock covered thereby shall remain available under the Plan for payment to participants. Shares to be delivered or purchased under the Plan may be either authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock or shares of Common Stock heldrepresented by the CorporationRestricted Stock Units during the period between the date such Restricted Stock Units are granted and the Payment Date with respect to such Restricted Stock Units, then additional whole or fractional Restricted Stock Units shall be credited to the Non-Employee Director’s Account. Such credit shall be made as treasury shares. Any shares of Common Stock issued by the Corporation through the assumption or substitution of outstanding grants in connection with the acquisition of another entity shall not reduce the maximumapplicable dividend payment date. The number of shares available for delivery under the Plan.

6.         OPTIONS.

(a)Term of Options.    The termwhole or fractional Restricted Stock Units credited as a result of any Optioncash dividends shall be determined by dividing (a) the Committee, but in no event shall any Option be exercisable more than ten years after the date on which it was granted. The Committee may grant Options intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422aggregate dollar amount of the Code, and Options not intended so to qualify;provided, however, that Options intended to qualify as incentive stock options may only be granted to employees of the Corporation and any subsidiary corporation (within the meaning of Section 424(f) of the Code).

(b)Option Price; Fair Market Value.    The price (“Option Price”) at which shares of Common Stock may be purchased pursuant to any Option shall be determinedcash dividends by the Committee at the time the Option is granted, but in no event shall the Option Price be less than 100 percent of(b) the Fair Market Value of such sharesa share of Common Stock on the date the Option is granted.dividend payment date. For purposes of the Plan, Fair Market Value is the closing sales prices of the Common Stock on the relevant date as reported on the stock exchange or market on which the Common Stock is primarily traded, or, if no sale is made on such date, then Fair Market Value is the weighted average of the closing sales prices of the Common Stock on the next preceding day and the next succeeding day on which such sales were made as reported on the stock exchange or market on which the Common Stock is primarily traded.

(c)Payment Upon Exercise.    Upon exercise of an Option, the Option Price The additional whole and/or fractional Restricted Stock Units acquired with any cash or stock dividends shall be payable to the Corporation in cash, or, at the discretion ofsame time as the Committee, inRestricted Stock Units representing the shares of Common Stock valued atgiving rise to the Fair Market Value thereof ondividends. Notwithstanding anything contained herein or in any Election or Amended Election (as hereinafter defined) made by a Non-Employee Director to the contrary, if a Non-Employee Director resigns prior to the Next Annual Meeting following the date of payment,the Restricted Stock Units were granted, such Restricted Stock Units shall be forfeited. In the event that a Non-Employee Director previously awarded or granted Restricted Stock Units shall terminate service as a Non-Employee director due to death or disability prior to the vesting thereof, the Board may in its sole discretion determine to vest such Restricted Stock Units, in full or in part, with settlement of such vested Restricted Stock Units to be determined in accordance with the Non-Employee Director’s Election. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, upon a combinationChange in Control of cashthe Company, all restrictions on sale, assignment, pledge or transfer on shares underlying Restricted Stock Units shall lapse and be of no further force or effect.

(c) All payments in respect of whole Restricted Stock Units shall be made in the form of whole shares of Common Stock.

(d)Surrender of Options.     The Corporation may, ifStock and any fractional Restricted Stock Unit shall be paid in cash based upon the Committee so determines, accept the surrender by a participant, or the personal representative of a participant, of an Option, in consideration of a payment by the Corporation equal to the difference obtained by subtracting the aggregate Option Price from the aggregate Fair Market Value of the equivalent fraction of a share of Common Stock. Unless a Non-Employee Director’s Election provides otherwise, the Payment Date in respect of the Restricted Stock coveredUnits credited to a Non-Employee Director’s Account shall be the date that is the third anniversary of the date such Restricted Stock Units were granted or, in the case of Restricted Stock Units granted to an Appointed Director upon his appointment, the date that is the third anniversary of the first business day that followed the Annual Meeting that immediately preceded his appointment. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any Election or Amended Election made by a Non-Employee Director, if a Non-Employee Director dies, all Restricted Stock Units remaining in the Non-Employee Director’s Account shall be paid to the individual or entity designated by the OptionNon-Employee Director in writing and filed with the Company (and if the Non-Employee Director did not designate a beneficiary or such designated beneficiary predeceases the Non-Employee Director, the Non-Employee Director’s beneficiary shall be the Non-Employee Director’s spouse, if any, or if none, his/her estate). All payments in respect of Restricted Stock Units shall be made as promptly as possible following the Payment Date and in any event, on or before the last day of the calendar year in which the Payment Date occurs.

(d) At least twelve months prior to the Payment Date with respect to any Restricted Stock Units, a Non-Employee Director may elect (an “Amended Election”) to defer distribution of all or any number of such Restricted Stock Units credited to his/her Account to a date occurring after the original Payment Date; provided, however, that (a) such Amended Election will not take effect for at least 12 months after the date on which it is made and (b) the distribution in respect of such surrender, such paymentthe Restricted Stock Units with respect to which the Amended Election is made must be at least 5 years from the original Payment Date. A Non-Employee Director’s Amended Election may otherwise provide for distribution at any time as could have been elected under an original Election.

(e) All Elections and Amended Elections shall be in cash,writing and shall be effective on and when received by the Company pursuant to procedures established by the Board from time to time. An Amended Election when received pursuant to such procedures is irrevocable when received.

(f) No Restricted Stock Units shall be pledged, encumbered, or ifhypothecated to, or in favor of, or subject to any lien, obligation, or liability of a Non-Employee Director to, any party, nor shall any Restricted Stock Units be assignable or transferable by the Committee so provides,recipient thereof.

6. AVAILABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK. There may be issued under the Plan as Restricted Stock or as Restricted Stock Units granted in lieu of Restricted Stock, including any Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units in respect of dividends thereon an aggregate of not more than 60,000 shares of Common Stock, valued at Fair Market Value on the date of such surrender, or partlysubject to adjustment as provided in shares of Common Stock and partly in cash.Section 7.

7. DILUTION AND OTHER ADJUSTMENTS.

(a)Changes in Capital Structure. In the event of any corporate transaction involving the CorporationCompany (including, without limitation, any subdivision or combination or exchange of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, stock dividend, stock split, spin-off, split-off, recapitalization, capital reorganization, liquidation, reclassification of shares of Common Stock, merger, consolidation, extraordinary cash or other distributions, stock repurchases or redemption at prices in excess of book value per share, stock issuances or sales at prices less than book value per sharedistribution, or sale, lease or transfer of substantially all of the assets of the CorporationCompany), the number or kind of shares or other event similarproperty (including cash) that may be issued or delivered under the Plan, the number of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units annually granted pursuant to Section 3 and granted in type orthe aggregate under Section 6 shall be automatically adjusted, in the manner determined by the Board in its sole discretion, to give effect to anthe occurrence of such event herein listed),so that the Committeeproportionate interest of the Non-Employee Director (and any person succeeding to such Non-Employee Director’s rights pursuant to the Plan) shall makebe maintained as before the occurrence of such adjustmentsevent, and such adjustment shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes of the Plan.

8. AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION. The Board, without the consent of any Non-Employee Director, may at any time terminate or from time to time amend the Plan in whole or in part, including, without limitation, to increase or decrease the number of shares of Common Stock granted as Restricted Stock or as Restricted Stock Units in Section 3; provided, however, that no such action shall adversely affect any rights or obligations with respect to Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units previously granted under the Plan; and provided, further, that no amendment, without further approval by the stockholders of the Company in accordance with Section 10 below, shall (i) increase the aggregate number of shares subject to awards under the Plan and(other than increases pursuant to Section 7), (ii) extend the awards madeperiod during which Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units may be granted under the Plan as set forth in Section 10, or (iii) modify the Committee deems equitable. Such adjustments may include, without limitation, changesrequirements for eligibility to participate in the total number of shares of Common Stock which may thereafter be delivered or purchased underPlan.

9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.

(a) Nothing in the Plan shall be deemed to create any obligation on the maximum numberpart of shares of Common Stock with respectthe Board to which awards may be granted tonominate any participant in any year under Section 5 hereof, todirector for re-election by the number of shares of Common Stock subject to purchase under any Option, and/Company’s stockholders or to limit the terms, conditions or restrictions applicablerights of the stockholders to remove any awards made underdirector. Except as expressly provided for in the Plan, including performance goals and including the Option Price payable upon exercise of any Option.

(b)Tender Offers and Exchange Offers.    In the event of any tender offer or exchange offer, by any person other than the Corporation, for shares of Common Stock, the Committee may make such adjustments in outstanding awards and authorize such further action as it may deem appropriate to enable the recipients of outstanding awards to avail themselves of the benefits of such offer, including, without limitation, acceleration of the exercise date of outstanding Options so that they become immediately exercisable in whole or in part, or offering to acquire all or any portion of specified categories of Options for a price determined pursuant to Section 6(d) hereof, or acceleration of the payment of outstanding awards payable, in whole or in part, in shares of Common Stock.

(c)Limits on Discretion to Make Adjustments.    Notwithstanding any provision of this Section 7 to the contrary, no adjustment shall be made in any outstanding Qualifying Awards to the extent that such adjustment would adversely affect the status of that Qualifying Award as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code.

8.         MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.

(a)Right to Awards.    No employeeNon-Employee Director or other person shall have any claim or right to be granted any awardRestricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units under the Plan.

(b)Rights as Stockholders.    A participant shall have no rights as a holder of Common Stock by reason of awards under the Plan, unless and until certificates for shares of Common Stock are issued to the participant.

(c)No Assurance of Employment.    Neither the Plan nor any action taken thereunder shall be construed as giving any employee any right to be retained in the employ of the Corporation or any subsidiary.

(d)Costs and Expenses.    All costs and expenses incurred in administering the Plan shall be borne by the Corporation.

(e)Unfunded Plan. The Plan shall be unfunded. The Corporation shall not be required to establish any special or separate fund nor to make any other segregation of assets to assure the payment of any award under the Plan.

(f)Withholding Taxes.    The CorporationCompany shall have the right to deduct from all awards hereunder paid in cashrequire, prior to the issuance of any federal, state, localshares of Common Stock pursuant to the Plan, the payment of, or foreignprovision by, a Non-Employee Director of any taxes required by

law to be withheld with respect to such payments and, with respect to awards paid in stock, to require the payment (through withholding from the participant’s salary or otherwise) of any such taxes, but the Committee may make such arrangements for the paymentissuance of such shares or otherwise. The Board shall be authorized to establish procedures for elections by Non-Employee Directors to satisfy such withholding taxes asby delivery of, or directing the Committee in its discretion shall determine, including payment withCompany to retain, shares of Common Stock.

(c) The obligation of the Company to issue shares of Common Stock (including net payments of awards paid in Common Stock).

(g)Limits on Transferability.    No awards under the Plan nor any rights or interests therein shall be pledged, encumbered, or hypothecated to,as Restricted Stock or in favorsettlement of or subject to any lien, obligation, or liability of a participant to, any party, other than the Corporation or any subsidiary, norRestricted Stock Units shall such awards or any rights or interests therein be assignable or transferable by the recipient thereof except, in the event of the recipient’s death, as provided in subsection 8(h) below. During the lifetime of the recipient, awards under the Plan requiring exercise shall be exercisable only by such recipient or by the guardian or legal

representative of such recipient. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its discretion, provide that awards granted pursuant to the Plan (other than an Option granted as an incentive stock option) be transferable, without consideration, to a participant’s immediate family members (i.e., children, grandchildren or spouse), to trusts for the benefit of such immediate family members and to partnerships in which such family members are the only partners. In connection with any transfer of an award granted pursuant to the Plan contemplated by the preceding sentence, (i) the Committee shall require that the transferor and the transferee enter into an instrument of transfer whereby the transferee acknowledges and agrees that the award shall continue to be subject to the same terms, conditions and restrictions as were applicable to the award while held by the transferee, and (ii) the Committee may impose such other terms and conditions on such transferability as it may deem appropriate.

(h)Beneficiary.    Unless otherwise authorized by the Committee, any cash payments on account of awards under the Plan to a deceased participant shall be paid to such beneficiary as has been designated by the participant in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation or, in the absence of such designation and in the case of awards payable in shares of Common Stock, according to the participant’s will or the laws of descent and distribution.

(i)Nature of Benefits.    Awards under the Plan, and payments made pursuant thereto, are not a part of salary or base compensation.

(j)Compliance with Legal Requirements.    The obligation of the Corporation to issue or deliver shares of Common Stock upon exercise of Options or otherwise shall be subject to satisfaction of all applicable legal and securities exchange requirements, including, without limitation, the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The CorporationCompany shall endeavor to satisfy all such requirements in such a manner as to permit at all times the exercise of all outstanding Options in accordance with their terms, and to permit the issuance and delivery of shares of Common Stock whenever providedas Restricted Stock and in settlement of Restricted Stock Units.

(d) No shares of Common Stock shall be issued hereunder unless counsel for by the termsCompany shall be satisfied that such issuance will be in compliance with applicable federal, state and other securities laws.

(e) Shares of any award madeCommon Stock issued under the Plan.Plan may be original issue shares of Common Stock, treasury stock, shares of Common Stock purchased in the open market or otherwise.

(k)Clawback Policy(f) The Plan is intended to be operated in compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 409A”). All awards granted underIf any provision of the Plan is subject to more than one interpretation, then the Plan shall be subject tointerpreted in a manner that is consistent with Section 409A.

10. EFFECTIVE DATE; TERM. The Plan is effective when approved by the termsCompany’s stockholders at the annual meeting of stockholders held in the Corporation’s recoupment, clawback or similar policy, as it may be in effect from time to time, as well as any similar requirements of applicable law, any of which could in certain circumstances require repayment or forfeiture of awards or of any shares of Common Stock or cash received with respect to any award (including any value received from a disposition of the shares acquired upon payment of an award).

(l)Amendment or Termination of the Plan.    The Board of Directors of the Corporation, without the consent of any participant, may at any time terminate or from time to time amend the Plan in whole or in part; provided, however, that no such action shall adversely affect any rights or obligations with respect to any awards theretofore made under the Plan; and provided, further, that no amendment, without approval of the holders of Common Stock2015 calendar year by an affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock voted thereon in person or by proxy, shall (i) increasevotes cast on the aggregate number of shares subject to the Plan (other than increases pursuant to Section 7 hereof), (ii) extend the period during which awards may be granted under the Plan, (iii) increase the maximum term for which Options may be issued under the Plan, (iv) decrease the minimum Option Priceproposal at which (A) Options may be issued under the Plan or (B) outstanding Options may be exercised, (v) permit the surrender of any outstanding Option as consideration for the grant of a new Option with a lower Option Price than the Option being surrendered or (vi) materially modify the requirements for eligibility to participate in the Plan. With the consent of the participants affected, the Committee may amend outstanding agreements evidencing awards under the Plan, and may amend the terms of awards not evidenced by such agreements, in any manner not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan.

9.         EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM OF PLAN.meeting. The Plan shall become effective when approved atterminate immediately preceding the seventh annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) by a majority offollowing the voting power ofannual meeting at which the Voting Stock (all as defined in the Corporation’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation) present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at such Annual Meeting. The Plan shall terminate on the date of the Annual Meeting in 2017,becomes effective, unless sooner terminated by action of the Board of Directors of the Corporation.Board. No awardRestricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit may be granted hereunder after termination of the Plan, but such termination shall not affect the validity of any award then outstanding.Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit theretofore granted.

10.        11. LAW GOVERNING.GOVERNING. The validity and construction of the Plan and any agreements entered into thereunder shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York,Delaware, but without regard to the conflict laws of the State of New YorkDelaware.

12. DEFINITION OF CHANGE IN CONTROL. For purposes of the Plan, a “Change in Control” of the Company shall mean the occurrence of any of the following events:

(a) Any individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) (a “Person”) becomes the beneficial owner (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 50% or more of either (i) the then-outstanding shares of Common Stock (the “Outstanding Company Common Stock”) or (ii) the combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (the “Outstanding Company Voting Securities”);provided,however, that, for purposes of this Section 12(a), the following acquisitions shall not constitute a Change in Control: (A) any acquisition directly from the Company; (B) any acquisition by the Company; (C) any acquisition by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries or (D) any acquisition pursuant to a transaction that complies with Sections 12(c)(i), (ii) and (iii);

(b) Any time at which individuals who, as of the date immediately following the date of stockholder approval of the Plan, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board;provided,however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to the date immediately following the date of stockholder approval of the Plan whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office

occurs as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to the election or removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a Person other than the Board;

(c) Consummation of a reorganization, merger, statutory share exchange or consolidation or similar transaction involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries, a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, or the acquisition of assets or stock of another entity by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (each, a “Business Combination”), in each case unless, following such Business Combination, (i) all or substantially all of the individuals and entities that were the beneficial owners of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and the Outstanding Company Voting Securities immediately prior to such Business Combination beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the then-outstanding shares of common stock (or, for a non-corporate entity, equivalent securities) and the combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (or, for a non-corporate entity, equivalent governing body), as the case may be, of the entity resulting from such Business Combination (including, without limitation, an entity that, as a result of such transaction, owns the Company or all or substantially all of the Company’s assets either directly or through one or more subsidiaries) in substantially the same proportions as their ownership immediately prior to such Business Combination of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and the Outstanding Company Voting Securities, as the case may be, (ii) no Person (excluding any corporation resulting from such Business Combination or any employee benefit plan (or related trust) of the Company or such corporation resulting from such Business Combination) beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of the then-outstanding shares of common stock of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination or the combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting securities of such corporation, except to the extent that such conflict laws require applicationownership existed prior to the Business Combination, and (iii) individuals who were members of the laws of the State of Delaware.

11.         CERTAIN TERMINATIONS UNDER SECTION 409A.    Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan or an award agreement to the contrary, ifIncumbent Board at the time of the execution of the initial agreement or of the action of the Board providing for such Business Combination constitute at least a participant’s terminationmajority of employment (within the meaningmembers of the board of directors (or, for a non-corporate entity, equivalent governing body) of the entity resulting from such Business Combination; or

(d) Approval by the stockholders of the Company of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

EXHIBIT B

ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

2015 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

1. PURPOSE OF THE PLAN. The purpose of the Alleghany Corporation 2015 Management Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is to allow Alleghany Corporation (the “Company”) to provide incentive compensation bonuses (“Incentive Bonuses”) to its officers, upon whom, in large measure, the sustained progress, growth and profitability of the Company depends. The Plan provides for the award of both Incentive Bonuses that are intended to satisfy the requirements for performance-based compensation (“Qualifying Incentives”) in Section 409A162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (“Section 409A”))and the participant is a “specified employee,” then any paymentsregulations thereunder (the “Code”), and Incentive Bonuses that are requirednot intended to satisfy such requirements (“Non-Qualifying Incentives”).

2. ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN. The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee”). Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have the exclusive authority to (i) select the officers to participate in the Plan, (ii) establish performance goals for Incentive Bonuses, including without limitation, any target, threshold or other level of performance that must be achieved to earn an Incentive Bonus, (iii) determine whether Incentive Bonuses will be Qualifying Incentives or Non-Qualifying Incentives, (iv) establish each Participant’s Incentive Bonus opportunity (or range thereof), (v) determine the amount of the Incentive Bonus payable to any Participant, and (vi) make all other determinations and take all other actions necessary or appropriate for the proper administration and operation of the Plan. Any determination by the Committee on any matter relating to the Plan shall be made to such participantin its sole discretion and need not be uniform among Participants. The Committee’s interpretation of the Plan shall be final, conclusive and binding on all parties concerned, including the Company, its stockholders and any Participant.

3. ELIGIBILITY. Incentive Bonuses under the Plan may be paid to those officers (including officers who are directors) of the Company who shall be selected by the Committee to participate in the Plan after consideration of management’s recommendations (the “Participants”). Participants may receive multiple Incentive Bonuses during the same year under the Plan.

4. PERFORMANCE PERIODS. Qualifying Incentives shall be payable to a Participant as a result of the participant’s terminationsatisfaction of employment that constituteperformance goals in respect of the deferral of compensation (within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)) and that would in the absence of this

provision have been paidcalendar year or such other period, not to the participant withinbe less than six months, and one dayas is selected by the Committee (a “Performance Period”). Non-Qualifying Incentives may be payable to a Participant as a result of the participant’s terminationsatisfaction of employment (the “Deferred Compensation Payments”)performance goals in respect of a Performance Period or as a result of the achievement of an individual objective or result, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

5. INCENTIVE BONUSES.

(a)Incentive Bonuses. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may grant Incentive Bonuses to any Participant, which Incentive Bonuses may be Qualifying Incentives or Non-Qualifying Incentives. A Participant may be granted one or more Qualifying Incentives or Non-Qualifying Incentives in respect of the same Performance Period and may be granted both Qualifying Incentives and Non-Qualifying Incentives at the same time or in respect of the same Performance Period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the grant or payment of any Non-Qualifying Incentive shall not be paidmade contingent on the failure to earn any Qualifying Incentive.

(b)Qualifying Incentives. Incentive Bonuses granted to any Participant who is a “covered employee” (as defined in Section 162(m) of the participantCode) for that Performance Period shall be a Qualifying Incentive unless otherwise determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. The right to receive (or retain) any Qualifying Incentive shall be conditional upon the achievement of one or more performance goals established by the Committee in writing at the time such award is granted. Prior to the beginning of each Performance Period, or at such other time no later than such time as is permitted by Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee shall establish in writing (i) the performance goal or goals (as described in Section 5(c)), upon which a Participant’s Qualifying Incentive shall be based and (ii) after consideration of

management’s recommendations, the target (or range of) Qualifying Incentive opportunity for each Participant based upon the attainment of such performance goal or goals. The Committee may provide for a threshold level of performance below which no amount of a Qualifying Incentive will be paid and a maximum level of performance above which no additional Qualifying Incentive will be paid, and it may provide for the payment of differing amounts for different levels of performance. The Committee may provide that a Qualifying Incentive shall be determined as an amount or a percentage of a specified incentive pool based upon operating income, cash flow, earnings before income taxes, net income or other measures constituting a performance goal (as described in Section 5(c)), with such adjustments or exclusions as the Committee may determine; provided, hereinhowever, that if the payment to a Participant of the Qualifying Incentive is based upon the attainment of one or more performance goals (as described in Section 5(c)) established by the Committee, the Committee may determine the amount of the incentive pool by reference to any measure (whether or not constituting a performance goal as described in Section 5(c)) as the Committee deems appropriate. The total amount or percentage of the incentive pool awarded to Participants shall not exceed 100% of the incentive pool, and the amount paid to any Participant from such incentive pool shall not be increased by any amount not paid to any other Participant.

(c)Qualifying Incentive Performance Goals. Performance goals, which may vary from Participant to Participant and from Qualifying Incentive opportunity to Qualifying Incentive opportunity, shall be based upon the attainment of specific amounts or percentages of, or increases or decreases in, one or more of the following: revenues; operating income; net operating income; cash flow; earnings before income taxes; net income; earnings per share; stockholders’ equity; return or net return on assets or net assets, investments, capital or equity; share price; share price appreciation; underwriting profits; gross or net premiums written; net premiums earned; compound growth in net loss and loss adjustment expense reserves; loss ratio or combined ratio of the Company’s insurance businesses; operating efficiency or strategic business objectives consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified cost targets; business expansion goals; goals relating to acquisitions or divestitures; and productivity improvements, all whether applicable to the Company or any relevant subsidiary or business unit or entity in which the Company has a significant investment, or any combination thereof as the Committee may deem appropriate.

Each performance goal may be expressed on an absolute and/or relative basis, may be based on, or otherwise employ, comparisons based on internal targets, the past performance of the Company or any subsidiary (or any business unit thereof) and/or the past or current performance of other companies or indexes, may provide for the inclusion, exclusion or averaging of specified items in whole or in such award agreement,part, including without limitation, catastrophe losses, realized gains or losses on strategic investments, acquisitions and divestitures, currency fluctuations, discontinued operations, extraordinary items whether of income or expense, accounting and tax changes, and any unusual or nonrecurring items, and, in the case of earnings-based measures, may use or employ comparisons relating to capital, shareholders’ equity and/or shares outstanding, assets or net assets.

(d)Qualifying Incentive Determination. As soon as practicable after the end of each Performance Period but before any Qualifying Incentives are paid, the Committee shall instead be accumulatedcertify in writing (i) whether the performance goal or goals were attained and paid(ii) the amount of the Qualifying Incentive payable to each Participant based upon the participant inattainment of the performance goal or goals established by the Committee. The Committee may determine to grant a lump sum, together with interest thereon atParticipant a rateQualifying Incentive equal to, but not in excess of, the yield per annumamount specified in the foregoing certification. The Committee may also reduce or eliminate the amount of any Qualifying Incentive of any Participant at any time prior to payment thereof, based on 6-month Treasury bills (secondary market) onsuch criteria as it shall determine, including but not limited to individual merit and attainment of, or the date the participant terminates employment (as reportedfailure to attain, specified personal goals established by the Federal Reserve Board) fromCommittee. Under no circumstances may the date payment would have been made toCommittee increase the participant under the Plan until the date paid, such payment to be made on the day after the date that is six (6) months from the dateamount of the participant’s terminationQualifying Incentive otherwise payable to a Participant beyond the amount originally established, waive the attainment of employment; provided, however, if the participant diesperformance goals established by the Committee for purposes of qualifying and Incentive Bonus as a Qualifying Incentive under Section 162(m) of the Code or otherwise exercise its discretion so as to cause any Qualifying Incentive not to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.

(e)Non-Qualifying Incentives. A Non-Qualifying Incentive may be awarded by the Committee to any Participant (including covered employees) at any time before, during or following the completion of any Performance Period and may, but need not, be conditioned upon the achievement of any performance goals established by the Committee. The Committee may increase, decrease or eliminate the amount of any Non-Qualifying Incentive awarded to any Participant at any time prior to payment thereof, based on such criteria as it shall determine, including but not limited to individual merit and attainment of, or the failure to attain or achieve, any performance goals or specified personal goals established by the Committee or management, and the Committee may waive the attainment of or modify the terms of any performance or personal goals established by the Committee or management or otherwise exercise its discretion in any manner with respect to any Non-Qualifying Incentive.

6. OTHER TERMS OF INCENTIVE BONUSES

(a)Death or Disability. In the event that a Participant previously awarded or granted an Incentive Bonus shall die or become disabled prior to the expirationcompletion of the Performance Period with respect to such Incentive Bonus, the Participant (or in the event of the Participant’s death, the Participant’s beneficiary) shall be entitled to receive such amount, if any, of the Incentive Bonus granted or awarded to the Participant as shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. Nothing contained herein shall preclude the Committee, in its sole discretion, from granting a Non-Qualifying Incentive to any Participant in respect of the Participant’s employment by the Company prior to such Participant’s death or disability.

(b)Other Terminations of Employment. If a Participant’s employment terminates prior to the end of a Performance Period for any reason other than death or disability, the Participant shall not be entitled to receive any Qualifying Incentive established for the Participant; provided, however, that if the performance goals applicable to such Qualifying Incentive are achieved and certified by the Committee (in accordance with Section 5(d)), the Committee, in its discretion, may determine that the Participant shall be entitled to receive all or any part of the Qualifying Incentive that would be payable to the Participant based upon the achievement of those performance goals. If a Participant previously granted a Non-Qualifying Incentive terminates employment for any reason (other than death or disability), the Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine that such Participant is entitled to receive payment of all or any portion of such six (6) month period, payment shall be made to the participant’s estate asNon-Qualifying Incentive.

(c)Payment. As soon as practicable following the participant’s death. For these purposes,Committee’s determination of the amount of any Qualifying Incentive payable to a participant willParticipant (in accordance with Section 5(d)), but no later than March 15th of such year, such Qualifying Incentive shall be a “specified employee” if, onpaid by the Company in cash to such Participant. A Non-Qualifying Incentive shall be paid in cash promptly (and in any event within two and one-half months) following the date of the participant’s termination of employment, the participant is an individual who is, under the method of determination adoptedfor payment specified by the Committee designatedat the time a Non-Qualifying Incentive is granted. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Committee, in its sole discretion, determines that a Participant who died or became disabled shall be entitled to receive an Incentive Bonus, then such Incentive Bonus shall be paid to such Participant (or in the event of the Participant’s death, the Participant’s beneficiary) in cash promptly following the date for payment specified by the Committee at the time the Incentive Bonus is determined by the Committee, but in no event later than March 15th of the year following the year in which such death or disability occurred. Nothing contained in this Plan shall require the acceleration of the time of payment of any Incentive Bonus that the Participant has elected to defer under any deferred compensation plan or arrangement of the Company.

(d)Annual Maximum. The Qualifying Incentives, individually or in the aggregate, that could be payable to any Participant pursuant to the Plan in any single calendar year shall not exceed $5 million.

7. DILUTION AND OTHER ADJUSTMENTS.

To the extent that a performance goal is based on, or calculated with respect to, the Company’s common stock (such as earnings per share, book value per share or withinother similar measures), then in the categoryevent of employees deemedany corporate transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any subdivision or combination or

exchange of the outstanding shares of common stock, stock dividend, stock split, spin-off, split-off, recapitalization, capital reorganization, liquidation, reclassification of shares of common stock, merger, consolidation, extraordinary cash distribution, or sale, lease or transfer of substantially all of the assets of the Company), the Committee shall make or provide for such adjustments in such performance goal as the Committee may in good faith determine to be equitably required in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants.

8. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.

(a)No Right to Incentive Bonus. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, no officer or other person shall have any claim or legally binding right to be paid any Incentive Bonus awarded or granted under the Plan prior to the actual payment thereof, and any Participant who terminates employment (other than due to death or disability) prior to the payment of an Incentive Bonus shall forfeit any right to receive such Incentive Bonus, regardless of the terms of any award or grant or any prior determination by the Committee.

(b)No Assurance of Employment. Neither the establishment of the Plan nor any action taken thereunder shall be construed as giving any officer or other person any right to be retained in the employ of the Company.

(c)Withholding Taxes. The Company shall have the right to deduct from all Incentive Bonuses payable hereunder any federal, state, local or foreign taxes required by law to be withheld with respect to such payments.

(d)No Transfers or Assignments. No Incentive Bonus under the Plan nor any rights or interests herein or therein shall be assigned, transferred, pledged, encumbered, or hypothecated to, or in favor of, or subject to any lien, obligation, or liability of a “specified employee” withinParticipant to, any party (other than the meaningCompany or any subsidiary), except, in the event of the Participant’s death, to his designated beneficiary as hereinafter provided.

(e)Beneficiary. Any payments on account of an Incentive Bonus payable under the Plan to a deceased Participant shall be paid to such beneficiary as has been designated by the Participant in writing to the Secretary of the Company or in the absence of such designation, according to the Participant’s will or the laws of descent and distribution.

(f)Non-exclusivity of Plan. Nothing in the Plan shall be construed in any way as limiting the authority of the Committee, the Board of Directors of the Company, the Company or any subsidiary to establish any other annual or other incentive compensation plan or as limiting the authority of any of the foregoing to pay cash bonuses or other supplemental or additional incentive compensation to any persons employed by the Company, whether or not such person is a Participant in this Plan and regardless of how the amount of such bonus or compensation is determined.

9. AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF THE PLAN. The Board of Directors of the Company, without the consent of any Participant, may at any time terminate or from time to time amend the Plan in whole or in part, whether prospectively or retroactively, including in any manner that adversely affects the rights of Participants; provided, however, that no amendment with respect to the terms of the Plan relating to the ability to grant awards that constitute, or affect, Qualifying Incentives that would require the approval of the stockholders of the Company pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code shall be effective without such approval.

10. LAW GOVERNING. The validity and construction of the Plan shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, but without regard to the conflict laws of the State of Delaware.

11. EFFECTIVE DATE. The Plan shall be effective when approved by the stockholders of the Company in accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(i). The Committee shall determine in its discretion all matters relating to who is a “specified employee” and the application of and effects162(m) of the change in such determination.Code.

ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION  

 

IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATIONElectronic Voting Instructions
You can vote by Internet or telephone Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.
VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.
Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., EDT, on April 27, 2012.

Vote by Internet

•    Go towww.envisionreports.com/YAL

•    Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

•    Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

Vote by telephone

•    Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA,

        US territories & Canada any time on a touch tone telephone. There is
Using ablack ink pen, mark your votes with anX as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. x

Electronic Voting Instructions

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

LOGO 

Vote by Internet

•  Go towww.envisionreports.com/YAL.

•  Or scan the QR code with your smartphone.

•  Follow the steps outlined on the secure website.

 

Vote by telephone

•  Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada any time on a touch tone telephone. There isNO CHARGE to you for the call.

•  Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message.

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on April 24, 2015.

 

 

Alleghany Corporation Annual Meeting Proxy Card

Annual Meeting Proxy Cardq

IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q

 A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the listed nominees andFOR Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5.

 

A1. Vote onElection of Directors   
1.Election of Directors — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the listed nominees.+
  For Against Abstain  For Against Abstain  For Against Abstain +
 1a - John G. Foos ¨ ¨ ¨ 1b - William K. Lavin ¨ ¨ ¨ 1c - Phillip M. Martineau
 ¨For ¨Against ¨Abstain
  For Against Abstain     
 1c - Phillip M. Martineau¨¨¨1d - Raymond L. M.L.M. Wong ¨ ¨ ¨     
Vote on ProposalsForAgainstAbstain
2.Approval of 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the following proposal.¨¨¨
Proposal to approve the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Alleghany Corporation.
ForAgainstAbstain
3.Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the following proposal.Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as Alleghany Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2012.¨¨¨
ForAgainstAbstain
4.Say-on-Pay — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the following proposal.Advisory vote to approve the executive compensation of Alleghany Corporation.¨¨¨
BNon-Voting Items
Change of Address — Please print new address below.

CAuthorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.

Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.

//
          

For

Against

Abstain

 
2. 

Approval of 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan

Proposal to approve the Alleghany Corporation 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan.

¨¨¨ 
          

For

Against

Abstain

3.

Approval of 2015 Management Incentive Plan

Proposal to approve the Alleghany Corporation 2015 Management Incentive Plan.

¨¨¨

For

Against

Abstain

4.

Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Alleghany Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2015.

¨¨¨

For

Against

Abstain

5.

Say-on-Pay

Advisory vote to approve the compensation of the named executive officers of Alleghany Corporation.

¨¨¨

 B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted — Date and Sign Below.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.
         /          /       + 

IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOUMUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.

01ZNTC


Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Alleghany Corporation 20122015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on April 27, 201224, 2015.

Our proxy materials relating to our Annual Meeting (Notice of Meeting, Proxy Statement, Proxy and 20112014 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K) are also available on the Internet. Please go to www.envisionreports.com/YAL to view and obtain proxy materials online.

For comments and/or address changes, please send an email to info2@alleghany.com or call 1.888.752.1356.

 

qIF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q

 

 

Proxy — ALLEGHANY CORPORATION+

 

 

PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS ON APRIL 27, 2012— ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ALLEGHANY CORPORATION FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 24, 2015

The undersigned hereby appoints Jefferson W. Kirby, Weston M. Hicks and Christopher K. Dalrymple proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute and with authority in each to act in absence of the other, to represent and to vote all shares of stock of Alleghany Corporation which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Alleghany Corporation to be held at the Harvard Cluboffices of New York City, 35 West 44th Street,Transatlantic Reinsurance Holdings, Inc., One Liberty Plaza, 17th Floor, New York, New York, on Friday, April 27, 201224, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., local time, and any adjournments thereof, as indicated on the proposals described in the Proxy Statement, and all other matters properly coming before the meeting.

WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN. IF NO SUCH DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

IMPORTANT - THIS PROXY MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED ON THE REVERSE SIDE.

 C Non-Voting Items

Change of Address —Please print new address below.

¢IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES  OF THIS CARD.+